malik matwi - Google+

malik matwi

9 followers -

Damascus Uni, Ritsumeikan Uni, Jica, Japan.

9 followers

About

Communities and Collections

View all

Physics

62,706 members

Ask to join

Social Media Strategy

329,120 members

Ask to join

Albert Einstein

131,570 members

Join

Michio Kaku (Fan Community)

1,523 members

Join

Posts

Post has attachment

malik matwi

Public

Aug 30, 2017

Add a comment...

Post has attachment

malik matwi

Public

Jan 3, 2017

Add a comment...

Post has attachment

malik matwi

Public

Sep 20, 2016

Add a comment...

Post has attachment

malik matwi

Public

Apr 6, 2016

my second paper has been announced in arXiv(Cornell university library).
http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01253
note: the first paper is considerable only with first nine chapters. the remains chapters 10 and 11 are corrected in the second paper.

[1604.01253] The dual behavior of quantum Fields and the big Bang

Abstract: We modify the propagation for the quarks and gluons, with that we have finite results, without ultra violet divergence in perturbed interaction of the quarks and gluons, this makes it easily for the interaction renormalization, like the self energy. Then we search for a way to remove ...

arxiv.org

Show all 4 comments

malik matwi: notes for my papers
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.docdroid.net%2FTYzB01L%2Fthe-time-stop-in-the-quantum-fields-fluctuation.pdf.html&h=UAQFERWTF

malik matwi: to satisfy the symmetries I related that modification to dual fields behavior, as I think the quantum nature behaves as scalar at the limit delta x to 0
and it is not charged at this limit.

when the length a could not be removed then the perturbation is broken, and that depends on the coupling constant behavior.
the more details in page 10, when r<a the total energy of the quarks becomes negative, so the perturbation is broken.

for the free fields, there are no conditions on a, then we can let ap<<1 then p<<1/a so r>>a so it is possible to set the limit a to 0,
we can find that in the figure 2, page 6

the propagation modification in my paper is exactly same the Pauli–Villars regularization for the scalar field propagation
http://isites.harvard.edu/.../icb.../15-regschemes.pdf

but the difference is in the meaning of M and 1/a
in Pauli–Villars regularization the cutoff scale M is a heavy particle mass
while in my paper the energy scale 1/a is a mass of paired particle-antiparticle, this is only at low energy for the quarks
at high energy 1/a is ignored while the mass M is taken at any energy.

the pairing particle antiparticle is like to say(for electrons photons interaction) that the long wave photons could not interact
with the high energy electrons as the possibility of the interaction with the low energy electrons.
that is, the long wave photons see the high energy electrons and positrons as paired electrons-positrons.

malik matwi: https://www.docdroid.net/TYzB01L/the-time-stop-in-the-quantum-fields-fluctuation.pdf.html

Add a comment...

Post has attachment

malik matwi

Public

Dec 28, 2015