1
1
Kathryn M's profile photoLisa Taylor's profile photoDavid Michael Cunningham's profile photo
4 comments
 
NO, get your mind out of the gutter and see the beauty. This child still has two more years left with his mother (according to biblical direction). There is nothing provocative about it.
 
Lisa Taylor - You are so correct.
 
Thank you Kathryn M. The thing is these people who are so quick to judge this woman forget that years back there was no such thing as a bottle. Either a mother nursed (if she could produce) or she hired a wet nurse. If there was no wet nurse they actually nursed the child on a goat/cow's tit. That's why they were considered it to be a good replacement. However, many children died doing that desperate act too. Modern time considers cows milk healthier..omg. Mad Cow disease. Come on folks: get a grip.
 
I'm right there with you on this Lisa and Kathryn. I like to bring this topic up to as many people as I can. It's my way of doing what I can to reverse this distorted view that our culture has on such a natural, healthy, and human act.
Add a comment...