View 12 previous comments
- May 1, 2012
- Richard Lindzen is one scientist who is regularly criticized by his peers. Calling him a learned scientist is disputed by better men than me. I am comfortable with my statements and see no fallacy, as any credible research into Richard Lindzin's character would reveal the same facts that I have acquired. YouTube videos are also not a credible source of information, and must be dismissed in favor of more appropriate data, which I presented. Also, you're hardly one to talk about logical fallacies when you listed man-made climate change debate as an 'proven example' of a failure of consensus when in fact it is far from unproven. That combination of recursion and premature declaration of victory was simply unacceptable.
It is said that any fool in error can find a quote in the bible, and you are doing your best to prove that statement right. Your links refers to the post-Climategate era, where there was a record level of climate change politicization that affected even learned scientists. It is sad but true: scientists are human, and they make errors. Even so, since then the scientists involved in the so-called 'scandal' were exonerated, and life in the scientific community returned to normal. http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/conspiracy-theories-finally-laid-to-rest-by-report-on-leaked-climate-change-emails-2021222.html has some of the details. You are taking incomplete snapshots of this debate and presenting them as a consistent trend. This is unacceptable.
But I am sick of repeating myself, and am growing tired of this. I'm muting this post, much to Armando Lioss's relief I imagine.May 1, 2012
- dont be 2smartMay 1, 2012
- Hide the Decline! anyway here is more nonsense! http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2012/04/supreme_irony_wind_farms_can_c.phpMay 1, 2012
- May 10, 2012
- What about if we all stop arguing and decided stop polluting and create a better world just by accident... Who is with me?May 19, 2012