Profile

Cover photo
Steven McDonald
62 followers|1,084 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Steven McDonald

Shared publicly  - 
 
Tim O'Reilly originally shared:
 
Before Solving a Problem, Make Sure You've Got the Right Problem

I was pleased to see the measured tone of the White House response to the citizen petition about #SOPA and #PIPA

https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#/!/response/combating-online-piracy-while-protecting-open-and-innovative-internet

and yet I found myself profoundly disturbed by something that seems to me to go to the root of the problem in Washington: the failure to correctly diagnose the problem we are trying to solve, but instead to accept, seemingly uncritically, the claims of various interest groups. The offending paragraph is as follows:

"Let us be clear—online piracy is a real problem that harms the American economy, and threatens jobs for significant numbers of middle class workers and hurts some of our nation's most creative and innovative companies and entrepreneurs. It harms everyone from struggling artists to production crews, and from startup social media companies to large movie studios. While we are strongly committed to the vigorous enforcement of intellectual property rights, existing tools are not strong enough to root out the worst online pirates beyond our borders."

In the entire discussion, I've seen no discussion of credible evidence of this economic harm. There's no question in my mind that piracy exists, that people around the world are enjoying creative content without paying for it, and even that some criminals are profiting by redistributing it. But is there actual economic harm?

In my experience at O'Reilly, the losses due to piracy are far outweighed by the benefits of the free flow of information, which makes the world richer, and develops new markets for legitimate content. Most of the people who are downloading unauthorized copies of O'Reilly books would never have paid us for them anyway; meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of others are buying content from us, many of them in countries that we were never able to do business with when our products were not available in digital form.

History shows us, again and again, that frontiers are lawless places, but that as they get richer and more settled, they join in the rule of law. American publishing, now the largest publishing industry in the world, began with piracy. (I have a post coming on that subject on Monday.)

Congress (and the White House) need to spend time thinking hard about how best to grow our economy - and that means being careful not to close off the frontier, or to harm those trying to settle it, in order to protect those who want to remain safe at home. British publishers could have come to America in the 19th century; they chose not to, and as a result, we grew our own indigenous publishing industry, which relied at first, in no small part, on pirating British and European works.

If the goal is really to support jobs and the American economy, internet "protectionism" is not the way to do it.

It is said (though I've not found the source) that Einstein once remarked that if given 60 minutes to save the world, he would spend 55 of them defining the problem. And defining the problem means collecting and studying real evidence, not the overblown claims of an industry that has fought the introduction of every new technology that has turned out, in the end, to grow their business rather than threaten it.

P.S. If Congress and the White House really want to fight pirates who are hurting the economy, they should be working to rein in patent trolls. There, the evidence of economic harm is clear, in multi-billion dollar transfers of wealth from companies building real products to those who have learned how to work the patent system while producing no value for consumers.

P. P.S. See also my previous piece on the subject of doing an independent investigation of the facts rather than just listening to the appeals of lobbyists, https://plus.google.com/107033731246200681024/posts/5Xd3VjFR8gx
1
Add a comment...

Steven McDonald

Shared publicly  - 
 
http://brianshih.com/78073742

Over the top title aside, this sums up what bugs me about the Reader redesign pretty well. Written by the former PM of Google Reader.
1
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
62 people
Megan Keane's profile photo
Julie Verive's profile photo
Jenny Zarate's profile photo
John Armstrong's profile photo
Jonas Dupuich's profile photo
Taylor Shogren's profile photo
Sarah Rodlund's profile photo
Benedek Nyikos's profile photo

Steven McDonald

Shared publicly  - 
 
Dan Gillmor originally shared:
 
Department of Rampant Hypocrisy: Lots more copyright violations by Internet censorship supporters in Congress.
1
Add a comment...

Steven McDonald

Shared publicly  - 
 
I love it when Gmail decides to randomly log me out in the middle of reading an email...
1
Add a comment...

Steven McDonald

Shared publicly  - 
 
Dan Gillmor originally shared:
 
The Obama administration, demonstrating again that it is more hostile to basic liberty than any of its predecessors, says it's a federal crime to do anything whatever that is not allowed in Internet companies' terms of service. No, they probably won't prosecute you.

But when governments create laws that are broken by essentially everyone, they are holding in reserve the ability to punish anyone for any reason. This is an extremist stance by Obama's Justice Department, but sadly it's not surprising.
1
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
62 people
Megan Keane's profile photo
Julie Verive's profile photo
Jenny Zarate's profile photo
John Armstrong's profile photo
Jonas Dupuich's profile photo
Taylor Shogren's profile photo
Sarah Rodlund's profile photo
Benedek Nyikos's profile photo
Links
Contributor to
Basic Information
Gender
Male