Press question mark to see available shortcut keys


Discover
Join Google+
Report an issue
Help
©2018 Google • Privacy Policy • Terms of Service • Maps Terms • Consumer information
Region


  • My Account
  • Search
  • Maps
  • YouTube
  • Play
  • Gmail
  • Drive
  • Calendar
  • Google+
  • Translate
  • Photos
More
  • Shopping
  • Docs
  • Books
  • Blogger
  • Contacts
  • Hangouts
  • Keep
Even more from Google
Sign in
Sign in
Alan Cox
Public
Apr 20, 2012

So Red Hat are totally about free software and freedom are they +Jan Wildeboer . If so then explain the following patch submission

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/20/328
[PATCH v2] [SCSI] scsi_dh: change scsi_dh_detach export to EXPORT_SYMBOL
Allow a proprietary non-GPL multipath driver, like EMC PowerPath, to detach a scsi_dh using scsi_dh_detach. This is an improvement over requiring them to write 'detach' to /sys/block/sdX/queue...
lkml.org
31 comments
31
18 plus ones
18
7 shares
7
Shared publicly•View activity
View 25 previous comments
  • Arjan van de Ven's profile photo
    Arjan van de Ven+5
    +Mike Snitzer well you came here calling everyone here a zealot and accusing them of not even reading your emails. Maybe you should give people the benefit of the doubt, and assume that they DID read the email. I did. I saw Alan warn you about a potential legal issue that in the USA is a felony.

    Not everyone who doesn't like people skirting around or violating the GPL license is a zealot... they might be a copyright holder instead...... and really, if someone doesn't like the GPL, you do not have to accept it.
    Apr 21, 2012
  • Alan Cox's profile photo
    Alan Cox+2
    +Mike Snitzer The scsi_dh code is linked with GPL kernel code. The scsi_dh authors can do things like grant exceptions to their own code but the moment it is linked with anything else GPL then they have no such ability.

    There are some very specific reasons for concerns about that proposed change. I'll be happy to discuss them with Red Hat legal or management in private on Monday.
    Apr 22, 2012
  • Mike Snitzer's profile photo
    Mike Snitzer
    +Alan Cox as you can see with the LKML post I just made; I'd prefer to discontinue my involvement in this google+ discussion. Thanks.
    Apr 23, 2012
  • Luis Rodriguez (mcgrof)'s profile photo
    Luis Rodriguez (mcgrof)
    Big WTF
    Apr 23, 2012
  • Wayne Schuller's profile photo
    Wayne Schuller
    Resolution?
    Apr 26, 2012
  • Alan Cox's profile photo
    Alan Cox
    I believe the patch has been withdrawn
    Apr 26, 2012
Add a comment...