Mohammed five year old science books are out of date and full of errors too. :-| Well in certain disciplines anyway. If an error is a disqualifier, as many changes in understanding as Evolutional theorists make yearly, you'd disqualify the whole discipline with your standard you imply. And, since Evolutional theorists purpose is to change things and get closer in their understanding to how it was, I see no issue there.
Now, BIBLE isn't written as a science book. Nor is it a HOW TO Ikea manual. For you to read it as one, is to read it through your navel from a hot stanky spot.
It's a book on how to live your life, not how to create the world or to define scientific comments.
BUT, scientifically, it was pretty dang close to a working PI number for that many years ago. The oldest book in the Bible described the earth sitting in nothing, rotating like a gob of clay on a potter's wheel.
Some people, perhaps you, take solace in thinking they understand so much, that they have some mythical power over the world because of their understanding. The WISE MAN realizes he's looking for the next mystery, not the next answer.