Profile

Cover photo
Funny status updates
52,530 followers|46,112,916 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
175
26
Preeti Rishi's profile photoMichelle Albiar's profile photocandice bailey's profile photoKim Kapshuck's profile photo
4 comments
 
QUIT YELLING AT ME
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
73
12
Princess Khadija's profile photoHelen Millar's profile photoCrystal Silvershine's profile photoMinecrafter Mc's profile photo
 
Ha ha very funny
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
202
36
Evie Acosta Huerta's profile photoBarbara Wheeler's profile photoPrincess Khadija's profile photoHelen Millar's profile photo
4 comments
 
Haahaa 
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
96
31
frederic maesh guillaume's profile photoNancy Aguilar's profile photoIsabel Trevino's profile photoMilly Pyron's profile photo
3 comments
 
Dance to the beat 
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
201
43
Mrs. Angela Parchi's profile photoTony Australia's profile photoJason Dupuie's profile photoMomina Ayesha's profile photo
2 comments
 
Hahahaha so true!
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
163
74
Bisma Anis's profile photoChristine Byrns-Allison's profile photoAashi nema's profile photoviren chainani's profile photo
3 comments
 
true....
Add a comment...
Have them in circles
52,530 people
M Razibul Islam Razon's profile photo
Chelsea Carre's profile photo
satish kaushal's profile photo
Dragica Bogeska's profile photo
Ajitha S Nair's profile photo
Nancy Shaughnessy's profile photo
Delia Spellman's profile photo
James Fortenberry's profile photo
Chris Mondragon's profile photo

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
59
5
Helena Gaudeus's profile photoPrincess Khadija's profile photoBlack Widow's profile photoMinecrafter Mc's profile photo
4 comments
 
Cool
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
171
30
Seeya Kapur's profile photoCrystal Silvershine's profile photoviren chainani's profile photofarees unissa's profile photo
2 comments
 
True
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
210
47
Bisma Anis's profile photoBlack Widow's profile photoAlen Mathew's profile photojewel orchid's profile photo
5 comments
 
Hahahahahahah u quess krong mr man.
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
144
53
Doreen  Patranato's profile photoCrystal Silvershine's profile photoBisma Anis's profile photoKrista Sharp's profile photo
5 comments
 
Lol
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
81
8
Ashleigh Rensing's profile photoviren chainani's profile photo
Add a comment...

Funny status updates

Shared publicly  - 
146
35
Kiki Schaeffer's profile photoNaafeera Abdel Hassan's profile photoyamini chauhan's profile photoCharles Kinney's profile photo
4 comments
 
Well, what was he thinking would happen? There aren't witches, just bitches!
Add a comment...
People
Have them in circles
52,530 people
M Razibul Islam Razon's profile photo
Chelsea Carre's profile photo
satish kaushal's profile photo
Dragica Bogeska's profile photo
Ajitha S Nair's profile photo
Nancy Shaughnessy's profile photo
Delia Spellman's profile photo
James Fortenberry's profile photo
Chris Mondragon's profile photo
Story
Tagline
Check funny status updates
Introduction

Humour or humor (see spelling differences) is the tendency of particular cognitive experiences to provoke laughter and provide amusement. The term derives from the humoral medicine of theancient Greeks, which taught that the balance of fluids in the human body, known as humors (Latinhumor, "body fluid"), control human health and emotion.

People of all ages and cultures respond to humour. The majority of people are able to experience humour, i.e., to be amused, to laugh or smile at something funny, and thus they are considered to have a sense of humour. The hypothetical person lacking a sense of humour would likely find the behaviour induced by humour to be inexplicable, strange, or even irrational. Though ultimately decided by personal taste, the extent to which a person will find something humorous depends upon a host of variables, including geographical locationculturematurity, level ofeducationintelligence and context. For example, young children may favour slapstick, such as Punch and Judy puppet shows or cartoons such as Tom and JerrySatire may rely more on understanding the target of the humour and thus tends to appeal to more mature audiences.

Main article: Theories of humour

Many theories exist about what humour is and what social function it serves. The prevailing types of theories attempting to account for the existence of humour include psychological theories, the vast majority of which consider humour-induced behaviour to be very healthy; spiritual theories, which may, for instance, consider humour to be a "gift from God"; and theories which consider humour to be an unexplainable mystery, very much like a mystical experience.[1]

Views on humour

Some claim that humour cannot or should not be explained. Author E.B. White once said, "Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but the thing dies in the process and the innards are discouraging to any but the pure scientific mind."[2]

Arthur Schopenhauer lamented the misuse of the term "humour" (a German loanword from English) to mean any type of comedy. However, both "humour" and "comic" are often used when theorising about the subject. The connotations of "humour" as opposed to "comic" are said to be that of response versus stimulus. Additionally, "humour" was thought to include a combination of ridiculousness and wit in an individual; the paradigmatic case being Shakespeare's Sir John Falstaff. The French were slow to adopt the term "humour"; in French, "humeur" and "humour" are still two different words, the former referring to a person's mood or to the archaic concept of the four humours.[citation needed]

Nonsatirical humour can be specifically termed "recreational drollery".[3][4]

Ancient Greece

Western humour theory begins with Plato, who attributed to Socrates (as a semihistorical dialogue character) in the Philebus (p. 49b) the view that the essence of the ridiculous is an ignorance in the weak, who are thus unable to retaliate when ridiculed. Later, in Greek philosophy, Aristotle, in the Poetics (1449a, pp. 34–35), suggested that an ugliness that does not disgust is fundamental to humour.

India

In ancient Sanskrit dramaBharata Muni's Natya Shastra defined humour (hāsyam) as one of the nine nava rasas, or principle rasas (emotional responses), which can be inspired in the audience by bhavas, the imitations of emotions that the actors perform. Each rasa was associated with a specific bhavas portrayed on stage. In the case of humour, it was associated with mirth (hasya).[citation needed]

Arabia

The terms "comedy" and "satire" became synonymous after Aristotle's Poetics was translated into Arabic in the medieval Islamic world, where it was elaborated upon by Arabic writers and Islamic philosophers such as Abu Bischr, his pupil Al-FarabiAvicenna, and Averroes. Due to cultural differences, they disassociated comedy from Greek dramatic representation, and instead identified it with Arabic poetic themes and forms, such as hija (satirical poetry). They viewed comedy as simply the "art of reprehension" and made no reference to light and cheerful events or troublous beginnings and happy endings associated with classical Greek comedy. After the Latin translations of the 12th century, the term "comedy" thus gained a new semantic meaning in Medieval literature.[5]

Social demographics

As with any form of art, acceptance depends on social demographics and varies from person to person. Throughout history, comedy has been used as a form of entertainment all over the world, whether in the courts of the Western kings or the villages of the Far East. Both a social etiquette and a certain intelligence can be displayed through forms of wit and sarcasm. Eighteenth-century German author Georg Lichtenberg said that "the more you know humour, the more you become demanding in fineness."[citation needed]

Root componentsMethodsBehaviour, place and size

Rowan Atkinson explains in his lecture in the documentary "Funny Business"[6] that an object or a person can become funny in three ways. They are:

  • By behaving in an unusual way
  • By being in an unusual place
  • By being the wrong size

Most sight gags fit into one or more of these categories.

Exaggeration
Main article: Exaggeration#Humour

"Some theoreticians of the comic consider exaggeration to be a universal comic device".[7] It may take different forms in different genres, but all rely on the fact that "the easiest way to make things laughable is to exaggerate to the point of absurdity their salient traits".[8]

Humour and culture

Different cultures have different expectations of humour so comedy shows are not always successful when transplanted into another culture. Two well-known sayings in Britain are "Americans don't do irony" and Germans have no sense of humour. Whether these sayings have any validity has been discussed in a BBC News article.[9]

See alsoReferences
  1. ^ Raymond Smullyan, "The Planet Without Laughter", This Book Needs No Title
  2. ^ Quotationspage.com
  3. ^ Seth Benedict Graham A cultural analysis of the Russo-Soviet Anekdot 2003 p.13
  4. ^ Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World [1941, 1965]. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press p.12
  5. ^ Webber, Edwin J. (January 1958), "Comedy as Satire in Hispano-Arabic Spain", Hispanic Review (University of Pennsylvania Press26 (1): 1–11, doi:10.2307/470561JSTOR 470561
  6. ^ Rowan Atkinson/David Hinton, Funny Business (tv series), Episode 1 - aired 22 November 1992, UK, Tiger Television Productions
  7. ^ Emil Draitser, Techniques of Satire (1994) p. 135
  8. ^ M. Eastman/W. Fry, Enjoyment of Laughter (2008) p. 156
  9. ^ "Do the Americans get irony?"BBC News. 27 January 2004. Retrieved 2 April 2012.
Further reading
  • Alexander, Richard (1984) Verbal humor and variation in English: Sociolinguistic notes on a variety of jokes
  • Alexander, Richard (1997) Aspects of verbal humour in English
  • Basu, S (December 1999), "Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor"Journal of Political Philosophy (Blackwell Publishing Ltd) Vol. 7 (No. 4): 378–403, doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00082, retrieved 2007-07-06 (Abstract)
  • Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage. ISBN 1-4129-1143-5
  • Bricker, Victoria Reifler (Winter, 1980) The Function of Humor in Zinacantan Journal of Anthropological Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 411–418
  • Buijzen, Moniek; Valkenburg, Patti M. (2004), "Developing a Typology of Humor in Audiovisual Media"Media Psychology Vol. 6 (No. 2): 147–167, doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_2(Abstract)
  • Carrell, Amy (2000), Historical views of humour, University of Central Oklahoma. Retrieved on 2007-07-06.
  • García-Barriocanal, Elena; Sicilia, Miguel-Angel; Palomar, David (2005) (pdf), A Graphical Humor Ontology for Contemporary Cultural Heritage Access, Ctra. Barcelona, km.33.6, 28871 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain,: University of Alcalá, retrieved 2007-07-06
  • Goldstein, Jeffrey H., et al. (1976) "Humour, Laughter, and Comedy: A Bibliography of Empirical and Nonempirical Analyses in the English Language." It's a Funny Thing, Humour. Ed. Antony J. Chapman and Hugh C. Foot. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press, 1976. 469-504.
  • Hurley, Matthew M., Dennet, Daniel C., and Adams, Reginald B. Jr. (2011), Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-01582-0
  • Holland, Norman. (1982) "Bibliography of Theories of Humor." Laughing; A Psychology of Humor. Ithaca: Cornell U P, 209-223.
  • Luttazzi, Daniele (2004) Introduction to his Italian translation of Woody Allen's trilogy Side EffectsWithout Feathers and Getting Even (Bompiani, 2004, ISBN 88-452-3304-9 (57-65).
  • Martin, Rod A. (2007). The Psychology Of Humour: An Integrative Approach. London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-372564-6
  • McGhee, Paul E. (1984) "Current American Psychological Research on Humor." Jahrbuche fur Internationale Germanistik 16.2: 37-57.
  • Mintz, Lawrence E., ed. (1988) Humor in America: A Research Guide to Genres and Topics. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1988. ISBN 0-313-24551-7; OCLC: 16085479.
  • Mobbs, D.; Greicius, M.D.; Abdel-Azim, E.; Menon, V.; Reiss, A. L. (2003), "Humor modulates the mesolimbic reward centres", Neuron 40 (5): 1041–1048, doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00751-7PMID 14659102.
  • Nilsen, Don L. F. (1992) "Satire in American Literature." Humor in American Literature: A Selected Annotated Bibliography. New York: Garland, 1992. 543-48.
  • Pogel, Nancy, and Paul P. Somers Jr. (1988) "Literary Humor." Humor in America: A Research Guide to Genres and Topics. Ed. Lawrence E. Mintz. London: Greenwood, 1988. 1-34.
  • Roth, G., Yap, R, & Short, D. (2006). "Examining humour in HRD from theoretical and practical perspectives". Human Resource Development International, 9(1), 121-127.
  • Smuts, Aaron. "Humor". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Wogan, Peter (Spring 2006), "Laughing At First Contact"Visual Anthropology Review Vol. 22 (No. 1): 14–34, online December 12, 2006, doi:10.1525/var.2006.22.1.14, retrieved 2007-07-06 (Abstract)