Vala 1.0?
This is a call to action. We need all of you using Vala, to file bugs against problems, issues and mistakes, share your thoughts on why they should be fixed before a 1.0 release.
If you have patches, please consider to add to your bug report.
Is time for #ValaLove and create a better development tool.
This is a call to action. We need all of you using Vala, to file bugs against problems, issues and mistakes, share your thoughts on why they should be fixed before a 1.0 release.
If you have patches, please consider to add to your bug report.
Is time for #ValaLove and create a better development tool.
Fully agree.32w
Excellent. Let's do this. Please also keep the mailing lists (both -user and -devel) informed. I will do a bugtracker triage soon, checking in particular the ancient issues, whether they are still to be considered or not.32w
Except for clear documentation of lang (the behind scene and best approaches too) and dev tools.
Vala is mostly OK and efficient for development. vapis docs are unclear plus some kind of standard packages repo (vala libs and bindings are scattered except the few in valadoc)
+yannick inizan has Json-vala but suffers same delays as we see in Ubuntu new apps.32w
Yes but fix bugzilla it's very clumsy manage merges and patches with it. Specially when you compare with GitLab or Github32w
There are a mirror repo in GitHub for Vala an all ones in git.gnome.org - All Projects
May we need to see if it can be used. Any way, bugs reports should be in bugzilla.32w
