However, the selfish gene theory cannot explain the sacrifice a person is willing to make in order to save a stranger, nor can it explain when someone gives the food or water they need to others, because in such cases, if it results in the demise of the altruist-or at the very least, the inability to multiply his own genes, or it diminishes his chances-then the genetic loss is greater than the gain regarding the genes he shares with one he rescued or fed, or favored, in general, over himself. To explain this further using numbers: my life is equivalent to a one hundred percent transfer and survival of my functioning genes, whereas the life of a stranger is equivalent to the transfer of a portion of my functioning genes, the genes we have in common, which is about five percent, so losing my life clearly means a greater loss of survival of my genes. Therefore the selfish gene theory is not able to explain these types of altruism in which genes of the altruist lose in a significant way. The explanation for this type of altruistic behavior cannot be based on gene selfishness. In addition, reciprocal altruism is not genuine altruism. Since it is a favored evolutionary strategy, it is expected to become prevalent when there is a need for it, as is the case with some animals that groom each other, or vampire bats regurgitating food for their neighbors, because the gene pool that carries its genes will be favored by selection and will inevitably prevail. The gene pool that does not carry this type of reciprocal altruism will leave the competitive race because the fate of the members of its species will be extinction. For example, vampire bats cannot survive more than two days without food, and reciprocal altruism is a lifeline for the numerous individuals who do not find food on a given night. Because of this, reciprocal altruism is a lifeline for the species as a whole, so it is certainly favored by natural selection. Generally, reciprocal altruism is well accounted for by science.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Albert Ripple (“bort”)Propriétairei have moved this post from the unsorted section to the chat center, since again it is not about physics. while anything non-physics is allowed in the chat center, it is preferred that scientific arguments not be made there, it is a place for hanging out. in other words, it is preferred that the only scientific proposals made in this community be about physics in particular, not the other fields of science. you may disregard this preference, but do note that this community is not apt for such discussion.7 sem.- Albert Ripple (“bort”)Propriétairealso, sacrificial altruism works similarly to reciprocal altruism: if two organisms have the sacrificial gene and one sacrifices themself to give the other a greater chance at survival, then it is more likely that at least one of them reproduces and the gene is passed on, since situations where a sacrifice would be needed are cases when both organisms could be killed if neither sacrifices themself. two organisms from the same family will share more genes, so if one has the sacrifice gene and sacrifices for their family then the gene will likely live on through that family, and if this family is successful enough, it will eventually encompass the entire species. but sacrifice can arise in a population even non-familially, if there is enough genetic variety in a population and the genes involved in sacrificial behavior are not too different from the already available active or inert genes, meaning enough members of the population could randomly get the gene such that eventually they help one another instead of just helping those without the gene. finally, sacrifice could initially be a purely socially learned behavior that is so beneficial that it sticks around long enough to eventually get ingrained into the genome via the selection against those few who buck the social system. and of course, we should keep in mind that current species can have traits from ancestral species, the genes developing long before the modern species do, and therefore modern selection pressures don't always explain every trait that still exists.7 sem.
+Albert Ripple
We recommend you to study the book of atheism delusion by Ahmed AlHasan, especially chapter six, which is about physics.5 sem.
