Evolution is purposeful
17 abonnés -
Ahmed Alhasan the savior of mankind, has emerged.
Ahmed Alhasan the savior of mankind, has emerged.
17 abonnés
Communautés et collections
Posts
Post partagé.
our opponent, or whoever denies the existence of God, cannot prove with conclusive evidence his claim that genetic mutation, or the continuous change in genes around which evolution revolves, is always a random change or mutation. The point is that he considers it random because the non-randomness of it hasn't been proven. This means that both possibilities are scientifically plausible. Therefore, we can say it is random, or non-random and even law-abiding and organized, or we can say it is a combination of randomness and non-randomness within the vast spectrum of possibilities that amino acid chains can provide. To make this more clear , we begin with an equal probability that genetic mutation is either random or non-random. We can say that the possible number of potential genetic mutations in nature is enormous. We can even say that it is a number that the "age of life" cannot accommodate. In fact, the age of the universe is miniscule in comparison. I do not think it is necessary to repeat the massive and astronomical figures pertaining to genes, some of which I have demonstrated in the section regarding hemoglobin. This massive number makes it impossible for us-who are limited by this "age"-to perceive order and non-randomness if they exist.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Post partagé.
We are not talking about the altruism of relatives or reciprocal altruism, which can both be accounted for genetically. And we are not talking about altruism for the sake of repute, which may occasionally be genetically accounted for as well. These types of altruism can benefit the bodies that practice them because they provide them with a better chance of survival. Furthermore, we are not talking about altruism, whose basis is individual selfishness, that transfers among individuals and groups as a cultural unit, such as showing off or anything similar, meaning that the motive for it is a psychological need or desire of the altruist. If this is the case, then what altruism are we talking about and considering as evidence that the human being is special and morally unique with respect to the rest of the animals?
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Post partagé.
We are not talking about the altruism of relatives or reciprocal altruism, which can both be accounted for genetically. And we are not talking about altruism for the sake of repute, which may occasionally be genetically accounted for as well. These types of altruism can benefit the bodies that practice them because they provide them with a better chance of survival. Furthermore, we are not talking about altruism, whose basis is individual selfishness, that transfers among individuals and groups as a cultural unit, such as showing off or anything similar, meaning that the motive for it is a psychological need or desire of the altruist. If this is the case, then what altruism are we talking about and considering as evidence that the human being is special and morally unique with respect to the rest of the animals?
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
Regarding what was mentioned above, my objective is not to reject the hypothesis of abiogenesis, or the formation of a self-replicating protein by some means if the material, conditions, and time are available. In fact, I believe in what the Imams pbut have said, and what cosmologists and biologists predict: that the universe is filled with organisms, and we are not alone. What I wanted to make clear is that abiogenesis is a dilemma that science has not solved, for it hasn't found a way around the problem of the availability of material and conditions suitable for the emergence of life, or let us say, as we believe, the implementation of the first genetic plan, or the seed of the genetic plan, out of inorganic chemical substances that evolved until it reached its purpose: the human being, and the human genetic plan.
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
The issue of this evidence (nothingness does not produce) is bigger than terrestrial life, so it is not related to Darwin's theory. We can summarize by saying that "the effect indicates a cause" doesn't mean that every effect indicates God directly but rather, that the chain of effects and causes must end up at an original (old, eternal, and self-existent) cause, because nothingness does not produce. This cause is God Almighty and life on this earth is just a small link in this chain. Consequently, any debate to refute this evidence must be about the origin of matter and proving that it came from nothingness, or nonexistence, This has not been proven by anyone. Actually, scientists have more or less proven that the big bang is the beginning of the physical universe. As a matter of fact, there was a cause behind the big bang. As such, the sequence of causes will continue after it until they end at the original cause, which is God Almighty. God willing, we will discuss next the standard model or the big bang, and how it demonstrates the existence of God.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Post partagé.
our opponent, or whoever denies the existence of God, cannot prove with conclusive evidence his claim that genetic mutation, or the continuous change in genes around which evolution revolves, is always a random change or mutation. The point is that he considers it random because the non-randomness of it hasn't been proven. This means that both possibilities are scientifically plausible. Therefore, we can say it is random, or non-random and even law-abiding and organized, or we can say it is a combination of randomness and non-randomness within the vast spectrum of possibilities that amino acid chains can provide. To make this more clear , we begin with an equal probability that genetic mutation is either random or non-random. We can say that the possible number of potential genetic mutations in nature is enormous. We can even say that it is a number that the "age of life" cannot accommodate. In fact, the age of the universe is miniscule in comparison. I do not think it is necessary to repeat the massive and astronomical figures pertaining to genes, some of which I have demonstrated in the section regarding hemoglobin. This massive number makes it impossible for us-who are limited by this "age"-to perceive order and non-randomness if they exist.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Post partagé.
We are not talking about the altruism of relatives or reciprocal altruism, which can both be accounted for genetically. And we are not talking about altruism for the sake of repute, which may occasionally be genetically accounted for as well. These types of altruism can benefit the bodies that practice them because they provide them with a better chance of survival. Furthermore, we are not talking about altruism, whose basis is individual selfishness, that transfers among individuals and groups as a cultural unit, such as showing off or anything similar, meaning that the motive for it is a psychological need or desire of the altruist. If this is the case, then what altruism are we talking about and considering as evidence that the human being is special and morally unique with respect to the rest of the animals?
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
Regarding what was mentioned above, my objective is not to reject the hypothesis of abiogenesis, or the formation of a self-replicating protein by some means if the material, conditions, and time are available. In fact, I believe in what the Imams pbut have said, and what cosmologists and biologists predict: that the universe is filled with organisms, and we are not alone. What I wanted to make clear is that abiogenesis is a dilemma that science has not solved, for it hasn't found a way around the problem of the availability of material and conditions suitable for the emergence of life, or let us say, as we believe, the implementation of the first genetic plan, or the seed of the genetic plan, out of inorganic chemical substances that evolved until it reached its purpose: the human being, and the human genetic plan.
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
Regarding what was mentioned above, my objective is not to reject the hypothesis of abiogenesis, or the formation of a self-replicating protein by some means if the material, conditions, and time are available. In fact, I believe in what the Imams pbut have said, and what cosmologists and biologists predict: that the universe is filled with organisms, and we are not alone. What I wanted to make clear is that abiogenesis is a dilemma that science has not solved, for it hasn't found a way around the problem of the availability of material and conditions suitable for the emergence of life, or let us say, as we believe, the implementation of the first genetic plan, or the seed of the genetic plan, out of inorganic chemical substances that evolved until it reached its purpose: the human being, and the human genetic plan.
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
The issue of this evidence (nothingness does not produce) is bigger than terrestrial life, so it is not related to Darwin's theory. We can summarize by saying that "the effect indicates a cause" doesn't mean that every effect indicates God directly but rather, that the chain of effects and causes must end up at an original (old, eternal, and self-existent) cause, because nothingness does not produce. This cause is God Almighty and life on this earth is just a small link in this chain. Consequently, any debate to refute this evidence must be about the origin of matter and proving that it came from nothingness, or nonexistence, This has not been proven by anyone. Actually, scientists have more or less proven that the big bang is the beginning of the physical universe. As a matter of fact, there was a cause behind the big bang. As such, the sequence of causes will continue after it until they end at the original cause, which is God Almighty. God willing, we will discuss next the standard model or the big bang, and how it demonstrates the existence of God.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Veuillez patienter pendant le chargement des autres posts.