Profile

Cover photo
Carlos Santos
100 followers|9,100 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

 
 
Last year I finished Movember around the 100th place in donations in the Netherlands. That already meant a lot, but we've now raised €1061 and rank 15th! http://buff.ly/1h3GyMX

Movember donations result in grants for cancer research. You can get more information here: http://buff.ly/IhbOJ0

And keep the donations coming! http://mobro.co/echie
1
Add a comment...

Carlos Santos

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Em parceria com Gizmodo, estou lançando a oficina "Arduino e eletrônica para curiosos": http://www.makers.net.br/arduino/ É um workshop num sábado à tarde (primeira turma: 24/ago), e você sai de lá com seu kit de Arduino + componentes, e sabendo montar e programar circuitos básicos.
 ·  Translate
1
Add a comment...

Carlos Santos

Shared publicly  - 
 
The law under which Swartz was prosecuted might be amended to become even more restrictive.
1
Add a comment...
In his circles
135 people
Have him in circles
100 people
Fabrício M. Lopes's profile photo
Fabrício Olivetti de França's profile photo
Talita Perciano's profile photo
John Cook's profile photo
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel's profile photo
Rogerio Neves's profile photo
 
 
(Shareable version.)

This happened to me -- I said "NO" every time Google tried to connect my G+ name/profile (thankfully, I don't use my VERY identifiable and unusual legal name), and then I "liked" a comment on a video and responded to it, and it flashed through a quick screen (I did not click on anything) that said something like "Connecting to G+ profile" (without any type of "You cannot leave a comment without connecting" or even "By leaving a comment, you are agreeing to connect" opt-out), and the "like"/comment was suddenly connected to my photo and G+ username.

Google, there is a REASON that I didn't want to connect my G+ profile, or any identifiable profile, to my fucking YouTube account -- THE COMMENTERS ON YOUTUBE.  I don't want them following me to other social media platforms, trolling, harassing, and abusing me.  I don't want to have to be blocking sexist, racist, homophobic, sophomoric, monosyllabic jerks every time I log in.

And I did NOT WANT TO CONNECT MY PICTURE to freaking YouTube -- the name is bad enough, but unless I want to change my G+ icon to something other than this photo of me (which I happen to be quite fond of), I'm now going to have to deal with crude sexual passes whenever I want to leave a comment on YT (which, btw, I'm quite disinclined to do at this point.)

Why do they not understand that shit like this makes (especially female) users feel UNSAFE??!?  If your name is "Bob Smith," you're a face in the crowd.  If your name is "Eleanora Rashid-Feldman" (to pull a random name out of a hat), you've just been identified as female, as someone who may be a member of one or more minority groups, as someone who may be interracial or in an interracial marriage, and YOU'RE SUDDENLY REALLY, REALLY EASY TO FIND.

If your name only has one or two shared namesakes in the world (or, as in my daughter's case, none -- I apparently have one, but he's a man in Eastern Europe), someone can very easily find out where you live, your phone number if it's listed, your address with a little effort.

If your name is "Jennifer Smith," you're less vulnerable, because your name is more common -- but, frankly, is Google's point that it's okay to treat people with less-common names differently, by sharing their legal-name data whether they like it or not, since they don't have the ability to get lost in a sea of people with similar/identical names?

Whatever the case, if you're a battered spouse or a trans woman or an ex-Mormon or an out queer teen who hasn't had The Talk with all of their family members yet, or ANY NUMBER OF OTHER REASONS WHY YOU MIGHT NOT WANT TO BE TRACKED DOWN BY SOMEONE, having your name linked in this fashion, without asking permission or giving the ability to rescind permission, creates an unsafe and frankly appalling environment of privacy infringement.

My daughter already has to worry about potential employers being able to Google her with ease due to her unusual name (Google didn't exist when she was born), so she has asked me not to be my usual outspoken self under my legal name, because it's too easy to connect us.  And she's very careful to never use her legal name online, other than in activities directly connected to her university, because she doesn't want to deal with political, sexual, or religious discrimination from someone who might otherwise hire her.

So, thanks, Google -- I guess "Don't be evil" went out the window a while ago.  Your "real names" policy, and particularly the way you went about linking YouTube with G+ profiles even for users who had specifically declined to link them, multiple times, is evil.

The worst part is that I can't even delete my damn YouTube profile now, even if I wanted to, without deleting my entire G+ account and profile (and probably the Gmail account associated it, which I've used for about a decade.

Uncool, Google.  Uncool.
1
Add a comment...

Carlos Santos

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Synchrotron Reveals Early Triassic Odd Couple: Injured Amphibian and Aestivating Therapsid Share Burrow:

http://figshare.com/articles/_Synchrotron_Reveals_Early_Triassic_Odd_Couple_Injured_Amphibian_and_Aestivating_Therapsid_Share_Burrow_/728242

Animation showing the result of the 3D segmentation of both specimens within the burrow in upper lateral view.

#paleontology   #paleobiology  
1
Add a comment...

Carlos Santos

Shared publicly  - 
 
 

"De acordo com o delegado Mario Andrade, o livro, além das fotos e cartazes apreendidos, "demonstram o perfil" do suspeito. "[O livro foi apreendido] para demonstrar a ideologia dele frente a nação brasileira, de defesa da anarquia", disse o delegado."
 ·  Translate
1
Add a comment...

Carlos Santos

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
There are many wonderful, moving testimonials of sadness about the suicide of Aaron Swartz.  But perhaps the most important one to read is this angry one, by Larry Lessig.

I'm particularly struck by the point that Larry makes towards the end, which illustrates how our society treats different "crimes" so very differently.

"For remember, we live in a world where the architects of the financial crisis regularly dine at the White House — and where even those brought to “justice” never even have to admit any wrongdoing, let alone be labeled “felons.” 

"In that world, the question this government needs to answer is why it was so necessary that Aaron Swartz be labeled a “felon.” For in the 18 months of negotiations, that was what he was not willing to accept, and so that was the reason he was facing a million dollar trial in April."

Aaron was most certainly a civil disobedient - in the grand tradition laid out so eloquently by Thoreau - but was he a criminal?  And those who have surely done far more damage to society not only go free but continue their malefactions with government looking the other way.
1
Add a comment...
People
In his circles
135 people
Have him in circles
100 people
Fabrício M. Lopes's profile photo
Fabrício Olivetti de França's profile photo
Talita Perciano's profile photo
John Cook's profile photo
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel's profile photo
Rogerio Neves's profile photo
Links
Contributor to
Basic Information
Gender
Male