Profile cover photo
Profile photo
michael badcock
97 followers
97 followers
About
michael's posts

Post has attachment
religion really sucks.

Post has attachment
no kermit!

Post has attachment
33GB of JSTOR Articles and a Manifesto


"Academic publishing is an odd system, the authors are not paid for their writing, nor are the peer reviewers (they're just more unpaid academics), and in some fields even the journal editors are unpaid. Sometimes the authors must even pay the publishers. And yet scientific publications are some of the most outrageously expensive pieces of literature you can buy. In the past, the high access fees supported the costly mechanical reproduction of niche paper journals, but online distribution has mostly made this function obsolete."

Post has attachment
thanks to Nick Hayden hayden for this chrome plugin gem

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
deep south banjo youtube witchcraft GOLD! what is this? i don't even... sheesh! is this the product of homeschooling? also.. star wars lego in shot.

Post has attachment
Lllllladies come to Canberra!

Check out Dan Ilic's discovery - a gorgeously sexist treasure trove which channels you straight to 1973 Canberra, where there's plenny of hot young bureaucratic ass, and um, roundabouts to plumb!

Mmmmmmm..... POLICY.

Post has attachment
velcro is awesome.

Post has attachment
You can’t Glad Wrap a dog shit and call it a crème brulee ..says Geoff Lemon in his next offering which looks at the manipulation of Australia by big business.

"........Shouldn’t this make you suspicious? Shouldn’t you think, when was the last time a large company did something to help your future when it wasn’t in that company’s best interests? When did large companies give a shit about “the Australian people”, or any other people, except as a source of custom? Not that they’re all the plotting evil monoliths of Mike Moore’s imagination, but they have no reason to care about you, unless doing so somehow benefits them.

And when someone has a clear conflict of interest in a case, surely their arguments for one side or the other have to be viewed with a great deal of skepticism?

The government does not have a vested interest in making tobacco or gambling companies less profitable. The government makes sweet revenue off that profit. But the government does have a vested interested in lowering smoking rates, and illnesses, and health costs, because the government represents the people. It has a vested interest in reducing problem gambling and social harm, because it represents the people.

The government does not have a vested interest in ruining the mining sector, because that sector supports the economy that keeps the government out of trouble. The government does have a vested interest in trying to get a decent slice of the revenue made by selling assets belonging to the people the government represents.

The government, then, has some sort of agenda other than its own enrichment. The companies do not. Their entire existence is predicated upon profit. Their arguments to protect that profit are easily collapsible. You can’t Glad Wrap a dog shit and call it a crème brulee........."

Post has attachment
hack your head
Wait while more posts are being loaded