In general it should not be forgotten that the highest aim of human existence is not the preservation of a state, let alone a government, but the preservation of the species.
And if the species itself is in danger of being oppressed or utterly eliminated, the question of legality is reduced to a subordinate role. Then, even if the the methods of the ruling power are alleged to be legal a thousand times over, nonetheless the oppressed people's instinct of self-preservation remains the loftiest justification of their struggle with every weapon.

Should one act on feelings of anger and spite, if such emotions are not on impulse, but have been felt constantly, and having those feelings gradually get worse?

Which emotion is worse for you to feel? I am curious to peoples responses.
Note: Not from any one else's perspective but your own.

Should right and wrong be defined by the individual, or the society?
Or; to what extent should the society influence the individual?

Should we attempt to bring technology to the level of human consciousness?

Chairorism.

My friend and I wrote this short article on our takes on environmentalism and veganism, constructive criticism is encouraged.