People , feel free to copy and re-Post this ..
In the end, Mother Nature ALWAYS Stomps Politics flat, and the Scientific Process with peer reviews tells us how Nature actually works.
Why Climate Skeptics Are Wrong, Scientific American
First of all, I agree that whenever looking at just One or Two sets of data it is ALWAYS Possible to find :
A) apparent "counter-trends" and
B) the warming trend is tiny right Now - only a few degrees.
But, looking at ALL the sets of data together,
I answer :
A) as sampling error ,
B) as exponential growth Always
Starts small - then explodes upward
Completely out of control of mankind;
About B) exponential growth will inevitably tip our world to out of our control ; Think of an Atlantic hurricane - it starts off as a small dip in barometric pressure for a lil rain storm off the coast of Africa i.e. "just a few degrees" then the exponential growth gets powered up by HEAT in natural cycles ;
^^ yeah that's natural scientific laws working for, or against, you folks ; and ignorance of the law won't save your a*s - so by the time it hits the Eastern coasts on the Atlantic Ocean it is UNSTOPPABLE by humans.
When Hurricane Katrina comes
Knocking at your door every day of the week it is just too late to fix it folks >>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Category_5_Atlantic_hurricanes#/media/File%3AHurricane_Katrina_Eye_viewed_from_Hurricane_Hunter.jpg
So I consider the Scientific American
Article below authoritative and conclusive on the Matter of Man-made global warming ..http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-climate-skeptics-are-wrong/