Profile

Cover photo
Anthony Küster
463 followers
AboutPosts

Stream

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
"Since Jan­u­ary 2009, ADL has tracked 70 inci­dents in which shots were fired between police and domes­tic ide­o­log­i­cal extrem­ists. Eighty-four per­cent of those involved were pur­vey­ors of extreme right-wing ideologies."
5
2
Paul Fewings's profile photo
 
or People With Mental Health Troubles
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Jerusalem is Holy to Islam Because Muhammad Travelled There
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) was blessed with the most miracles, traveling body and soul to the great mosque at Jerusalem during the night."
Truth:
The Muslim connection to Jerusalem is extremely tenuous compared to Judaism and Christianity. In fact, the claim to the city exists largely because it is held sacred by Western religion. From the time of Muhammad to the present day, Islam has always been a "me too" faith, attempting to ride the coattails of other religions.

The official reason that Muslims claim Jerusalem for themselves - after marching an army into the city only two years after Muhammad's death - is that their prophet once visited there...

Unfortunately this would have been in a dream - not in real life. As much as those demanding full control of Jerusalem today would prefer, there is simply no evidence that Muhammad's physical body ever made the trip.

There is certainly ample evidence that Muhammad claimed to have had a dream about traveling there. It also came at a time that was trying to convince the doubters around him that he belonged to the line of Jewish prophets. His story of leading other prophets (Abraham, Moses and Jesus) in prayer at the mosque in Jerusalem was thus highly convenient (in truth no mosque had ever existed there).

Aisha, Muhammad’s favorite wife, later insisted that it was not a physical journey (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 265) and there has always been controversy within Islam about whether it was supposed to have been a physical or "spiritual" visit.

At the time, the Meccans mocked Muhammad for claiming to have visited Jerusalem in one night, since it was a one month journey to get there and back. In fact, “many Muslims gave up their faith” when they heard this, according to his biographer (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 265). But had the Meccans only known how big the universe really is, then they would have reserved the greatest ridicule for Muhammad’s claim to have visited the gates of heaven in the same dream – and it is doubtful that anyone would have believed him at that point.

The observable universe is 93 billion light years wide, meaning that it takes 93 billion years to make it from one side to the other even traveling at the speed of light. In "Leaving Islam" by Ibn Warraq, a young contributor points out that if Muhammad had left the (non-existent) mosque in Jerusalem 1400 years ago, traveling at this phenomenal speed through the icy void of space, he would still be trying to make it out of our galaxy (p. 347). At this point, Muslims (who claim that theirs is the most "scientific" of religions) fall back on the idea that Muhammad visited Jerusalem "in spirit"... whatever that means.

To prove his claim, a nervous Muhammad gave a general description of the city "from above" to Abu Bakr, who “verified” it to be true. Muhammad shouldn’t have worried about his most faithful apostle, at least, since Abu Bakr had already pledged his loyalty to whatever his prophet had to say: “If he says it, then it is true.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 265).

Abu Bakr's gullibility was legendary. Not only did he hand over his own 6-year-old daughter in "marriage" at Muhammad's request, but his prophet even got him to believe in talking cows at one point:
Once Allah's Apostle; offered the morning prayer and then faced the people and said, "While a man was driving a cow, he suddenly rode over it and beat it. The cow said, "We have not been created for this, but we have been created for sloughing." On that the people said astonishingly, "Glorified be Allah! A cow speaks!" The Prophet said, "I believe this, and Abu Bakr and 'Umar too, believe it, although neither of them was present there. (Bukhari 56:677)
Obviously, those who believe Muhammad's claim to have traveled to Jerusalem either in body or in spirit rely on blind faith rather than common sense. He was also known to use the veil of sleep to make other grandiose claims about himself, once insisting"while I was sleeping, the keys to the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand" (Bukhari 52:220).

Even though he may never have traveled to Jerusalem before his "dream", it is quite likely that Muhammad heard descriptions of the city from traders who had been in the city, particularly since he was known to seek out story tellers on his business trips.

There is simply no compelling reason to believe that Muhammad’s dream was anything other than that.
3
2
Javed Khan's profile photo
 
Can u plz show me one verse from Torah God saying Abraham was a Jew? Israel was a Jew and the tribes of Israel was a Jew? For the children of Israel to be a jews first Abraham has to be a Jew plz quickly show the verse from Torah God saying Abraham was a Jew?
U white joker your land is Eu not middle east because middle east is not the land of whites jokers... can u plz show verse saying king Solomon was a Jew but again for him to be a Jew prophet Abraham has to be a Jew... if u show the verse u take Jureslam for ever and take Al Aqsa.. u claim it was king Solomon temple rite then show the verse.. if Abraham was not a Jew then king Solomon was not a Jew and if King Solomon was not a Jew then there was no Solomon temple at Al Aqsa simple 
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Early Muslims were Persecuted and Suffered Many Deaths at Mecca
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) and his followers suffered much torture and many death at the hands of the polytheists."
Truth:
It’s true that some Muslims did suffer persecution at Mecca, but the extent of this is greatly exaggerated by modern-day storytellers, who are desperate to justify subsequent Muslim aggression. It is important to note that Muhammad himself was the source of bitterness against the early Muslims, yet he was protected from personal consequence by his powerful uncle, Abu Talib. Muhammad’s biographer recorded many instances in which the leading men of Mecca beseeched Muhammad (either directly or through his uncle) to stop mocking the religion of their ancestors:
Abu Sufyan, with other sundry notables, went to Abu Talib and said: "You know the trouble that exists between us and your nephew, so call him and let us make an agreement that he will leave us alone and we will leave him alone; let him have his religion and we will have ours." (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 278)
Muhammad felt safe in rejecting their peace offering because he did not have to be accountable for the trouble that he was causing. This undoubtedly compounded the frustration of the local leaders, some of whom then took it out on other Muslims over whom they had power. These were primarily slaves and lower ranking family members.

Modern apologists are fond of repeating an apocryphal tale concerning the martyring of an elderly woman named Umm Summayah. She was one of the first converts to Islam and a slave of Abu Jahl, an adversary of Muhammad. According to the contemporary version of the tale, Umm Summayah died of a spear thrust from Abu Jahl. Unfortunately, there is scant evidence to support this (it is not contained in reliable accounts and even Ibn Kathir admits that authenticity is "lacking" vol.1 p.331).

It is more likely that Umm Summayah died of stress while exposed to the heat at Mecca:
The B. Makhzum used to take out Ammar bin Yasir with his father mother, who were Muslims, in the heat of the day and expose them to the heat of Mecca, and the Apostle passed by them and said, so I have heard, 'Patience, O family of Yasir! Your meeting place will be paradise." They killed his mother, for she refused to abandon Islam. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 206)
This is the only recorded death of a Muslim who had suffered persecution at Mecca. It is not supported by either Bukhari or Sahih Muslim, although Ibn Sa'd does make a reference to the event that appears to be based on Ibn Ishaq/Hisham's account. It is unclear why there is not more emphasis and detail about the death of Umm Summayah if she were actually bayoneted. (Interestingly, there is more evidence to support the death of Muhammad's own daughter from the stress of Muslim persecution following her father's death).

Beyond this curious event, which would have occurred after the Muslims became physically aggressive with Abu Jahl and the polytheists, there is nothing to substantiate the wild tales of deadly abuse that today's Islamophiles are fond of claiming.

It is critical to note that, despite the detailed list of indictments against the Meccans that are scattered liberally and redundantly throughout the Quran, it never once says that any Muslims were actually killed by their adversaries during the thirteen years prior to their eviction. Instead, the worst of crimes is detailed in Sura 2:217:
"...but graver is it in the sight of Allah to prevent access to the path of Allah, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members."
Allah's indictment against the Meccans is that they evicted Muhammad from Mecca (the only eviction of record) and were denying he and some of the other Muslims the ability to visit the Kaaba during pilgrimage.

There is no mention of death inflicted on the early Muslims. Instead the same verse attempts to convince them that they are justified in killing Meccans merely for not wanting to have anything to do with them. The verse goes on to say:
"Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter"
At the time, Muhammad was urging his people to attack merchant caravans from Mecca, which involved killing the drivers and stealing the goods. This became the primary source of income for the Muslims at Medina, and Muhammad became a wealthy man by appropriating a fifth of all loot collected for himself (on Allah's command, of course).
3
1
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Muhammad was Persecuted at Mecca for Preaching Islam
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) suffered at the hands of the polytheists merely for preaching the religion of Allah to the poor and marginalized"
Truth:
According to Muslim historians, the Meccans were actually quite tolerant of Muhammad preaching his new religion. Mecca was an open society where different religions were respected. Polytheists, Jews and Christians lived and worshipped side-by-side, especially during the holy months, when pagan pilgrims would travel long distances from beyond the city to perform their rituals at the Kaaba.

Muhammad brought on the resentment of the local people not by preaching Islam, but by breaking with Meccan tradition and cursing other religions:
When the apostle openly displayed Islam as Allah ordered him, his people did not withdraw or turn against him, so far as I have heard, until he spoke disparagingly of their gods. When he did that, they took great offence and resolved unanimously to treat him as an enemy. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 167), "[Muhammad] declared Islam publicly to his fellow tribesmen. When he did so, they did not withdraw from him or reject him in any way, as far as I have heard, until he spoke of their gods and denounced them." (al-Tabari Vol.VI, p.93)
Although asked to stop, Muhammad continued to stir up trouble by “condemning” the local religion, causing the Meccans great anxiety:
[The Meccans] said they had never known anything like the trouble they had endured from this fellow. He had declared their mode of life foolish, insulted their forefathers, reviled their religion, divided the community and cursed their gods (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 183)."We [the Meccans] have never seen the like of what we have endured from this man [Muhammad]. He has derided our traditional values, abused our forefathers, reviled our religion, caused division among us, and insulted our gods. We have endured a great deal from him." (al-Tabari, Vol.VI p.101)
Not only was this an insult to the people and their traditions, but it also threatened the local economy, which depended on the annual pilgrimage. Still, they were so eager to live at peace, that they offered Muhammad money if he would stop stirring up trouble:
They decided to send for Muhammad and to negotiate and argue with him... When he came and sat down with them, they explained that that they had sent for him in order that they could talk together. No Arab had ever treated his tribe as Muhammad had treated them, and they repeated the charges... If it was money he wanted, they would make him the richest of them all; if it was honor, he should be their prince; if it was sovereignty, they would make him king. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 188)
Further proof that the Meccans did not have a problem with Islam existing side-by-side with their own religion is found in the episode known as the Satanic Verses. According to Muslim historians, Muhammad briefly agreed to their demand to cease disparaging the local gods and recognize the rights of others to their religion:
When [the Meccans] heard that, they rejoiced. What he had said about their gods pleased and delighted them, and they gave ear to him… When he came to the prostration and finished the chapter, he prostrated and the Muslims followed their prophet in it, having faith in what he brought them and obeying his command. Those mushrikūn of Quraysh and others who were in the mosque also prostrated on account of what they had heard him say about their gods. In the whole mosque there was no believer or kāfir who did not prostrate. (al-Tabari, the Tarikh Vol. 1)
The Meccans were clearly relieved that the unprecedented tension over religious beliefs was broken. They rejoiced by praying alongside the Muslims at the Kaaba. They accepted the Muslims once Muhammad accepted them.

Unfortunately the period of peace and brotherhood was short-lived. Muhammad soon reneged on his words after his own people began to question the contradiction between his previous claims and his new-found tolerance for other faiths. This incident, particularly his about-face, had the effect of ratcheting up the tension and hostility all the more.
4
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
"Muslims killing so called Muslims!"
Erbil-For the first time since ISIS took control over Mosul (June 2014), it witnessed on Monday evening a women demonstration …
1
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Gingrich "outrageous" proposal is good-natured and logical
Within hours of Thursday’s terror attack in France by Islamic State- inspired terrorist Mohamed Lahouaiej- Bouhlel, the former speaker of the U.S. Congress, Newt Gingrich, called for weeding out all Muslim Americans who support Islamic sharia.
1
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
463 people
Frendly Weidberg's profile photo
Frederico Durando's profile photo
James McCullen XXIV's profile photo
Bob Williams's profile photo
harbhajansingh janchetna's profile photo
Doug Patriot's profile photo
Armin von Kink's profile photo
Mike Niccum's profile photo
Oppsidens Next Sea's profile photo

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Muhammad and His Followers were Forced to Flee Mecca Under Persecution
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) was chased with his followers from their homes and forced to seek refuge [in Medina]"
Truth:
Only Muhammad was in danger at Mecca - and this was after he made a treaty of war against the local residents while living among them.

After his influential uncle died, Muhammad was exposed to the wrath of the Meccans, whom he had been insulting free of penalty for so many years. Still, they did not seek to harm him, because they believed that his vulnerability following the death of his protector meant that he would finally stop stirring up trouble.

They were mistaken.

Muhammad eventually made an alliance with another town, Medina, that included provisions of war against the Meccans. The parties to the treaty were asked “Do you realize to what you are committing yourselves in pledging your support to this man? It is to war against all and sundry” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 299). The pledge to war is further confirmed in Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 305.

Therefore, it was only after Muhammad committed himself to armed revolution against the Meccans that the town’s leaders sought to have him either killed or evicted.

The historical account also flatly contradicts the popular view that all Muslims had to flee Mecca following Muhammad’s declaration of war. In fact, it was only Muhammad himself whom the Meccans were interested in seizing. This is proven by the episode recounted in Ibn Ishaq/Hisham (326-328) in which Muhammad's own son-in-law, Ali, sleeps in his bed to trick his enemies into thinking that they had cornered him on the night they came to seize him.

Not only did the Meccans do no harm to Ali, even after finding out that he had fooled them, but he remained in the city for several days thereafter with Muhammad’s daughter Fatima in order to arrange the transfer of the family business to Medina.

The story of Fatima's sister, Muhammad's oldest daughter, is of acute embarrassment to those who insist Muslims were suffering in Mecca. Zaynab was married to Abu al-Aas ibn al-Rabee, one of Muhammad's arch enemies, and had no desire to leave. When Muhammad took her husband prisoner at the Battle of Badr, Zaynab tried to ransom him, but the prophet of Islam would not free the man until she promised to leave Mecca and live in Medina with him instead. She was actually forced to trade her marriage for her husband's life. It was not until Abu al-Aas agreed to "embrace" Islam (after being taken hostage again six years later following a Muslim caravan raid) that Muhammad allowed the two to live together.

Muslim biographers provide the names of other Muslims who continued to live in Mecca following Muhammad’s departure and there is no record that they were persecuted. There is even some evidence that the Muslims in Medina were allowed to conduct pilgrimages back to Mecca during the holy months (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 424 & Qur’an 2:196).

It is important to note that Muhammad justified his own eviction at the hands of the Meccans by his subsequent actions in Medina, where he began evicting the native Jewish tribes within just a few months of arriving. Apologists are fond of claiming that the eviction (and outright execution) of the Jews on the direct order of Muhammad was necessary because of their “enmity” towards him.

Unfortunately for the Jews, the Muslims were far less patient and far more severe with them than the Meccans had been with Muhammad – but this is just one of the many grand hypocrisies of Islam.

A supremacist ideology is always its own justification.
1
Javed Khan's profile photo
 
From where do u learn all this nonsense.. u joker if I start a new religion is it possible I can start with sword ? If I do I will be killed or arrested with my followers because where i live that country is not ruled by me it is ruled by Indian government and the majority of people do not follow what I follow so it is impossible .. now plz explain how can Muhammad start Islam with sword because when he started he had only few followers and Makkah was ruled by pangs they had Army and every things.. plz explain when his uncle died before his death where did Muhammad lived for more then 2 or 3 years if u claim Makkah then sorry he did not plz learn proper history.. first learn when did Muhammad and Makkah pagans fought first war then claim Muhammad started the war with Makkah... Muhammad did not start the war the first battle between Muhammad and Makkah pagans took place in badr and badr is very near to median not Makkah so the Makkah came to badr plz lean.. Muhammad army was only around 300 and Makkah army was 1000.. plz lean jackass ....plz read full history he did not evacuate all Arabs jews tribes from median many jews use to live with Muhammad and some converted to Islam the tribes who left median was they used to take interest like bank takes when they give loan and some left because they started to fight with Muslims and they could not see jews converting to Islam.. plz learn history correctly do not miss guide u Zinost Jew .. why would they kill Ali when they came to kill only Muhammad ? Muhammad was threat and his religion not Ali if Muhammad is dead his religion will die with him so killing Ali will not end muhammad religion.. plz learn son.. if I come to kill u and if u not home why would I kill your brother? I want u not your brother if u dead the problem is solved.. even one on earth do not think like Jew and every one is not like Jew if they come to kill me and if they do not find me they will kill my family.. do u know why because Torah says to kill u want verse let me know..

before Muhammad left Makkah for Medina he was forced to live in valley of Abu Talib.
The Meccan boycott of the Hashemites was a public boycott against the clan of Banu Hashim / Hashmi Family, declared in 617 by the leaders of Banu Makhzum and Banu Abd-Shams, two important clans of Quraysh and its commercial rival. According to tradition, the boycott was carried out in order to put pressure on Banu Hashim to withdraw its protection from Muhammad.[1]

The terms imposed on Banu Hashim, as reported by Ibn Ishaq, were "that no one should marry their women nor give women for them to marry; and that no one should either buy from them or sell to them, and when they agreed on that they wrote it in a deed." The boycott lasted for two or three years but eventually collapsed mainly because it was not achieving its purpose; the boycott had caused extreme privation and the sympathizers within the Quraysh finally united to annul the agreement.
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Pagans were the First to Draw Blood in their Conflict with Muslims at Mecca
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) and his followers were always peaceful [at Mecca], despite suffering unprovoked abuse and attacks by the polytheists"
Truth:
The Muslims were actually the first to resort to physical violence, when Sa’d bin Abu Waqqas picked up a camel’s jawbone and struck a local polytheist who was “rudely interrupting” his group of praying Muslims. "This was the first blood to be shed in Islam" (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 166).

The new converts were quite aggressive, particularly when they could get away with it, which was the misfortune of others. An example is when one of the strongest Muslims, Hamza, struck a Meccan leader by the name of Abu Jahl ‘violently” with his bow for speaking in an insulting way to Muhammad:
When he got to the mosque [Hamza] saw [Abu Jahl] sitting among the people, and went up to him until he stood over him, when he lifted up his bow and struck him a violent blow with it, saying, 'Will you insult him when I follow his religion, and say what he says? Hit me back if you can!' (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 185).
Although Abu Jahl did not retaliate against the more powerful man at the time, he later mistreated his Muslim slaves, almost certainly as a consequence of his public humiliation.

The Muslims would later be the first to declare war at Mecca, and were subsequently evicted. Even then, they were the first to renew hostilities as Muhammad ordered deadly raids against Meccan caravans from his new home in Medina.
3
1
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Muhammad was Tortured by His Adversaries at Mecca
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) suffered much abuse and torture at the hands of the polytheists."
Truth:
This never happened. Unlike some of his less fortunate followers, Muhammad enjoyed the protection of his powerful uncle, Abu Talib:
[The leading men of Mecca] went to Abu Tablib [and said] “Your nephew has cursed our gods, insulted our religion, mocked our way of life and accused our forefathers of error. Either you must stop him or you must let us get at him”
But Abu Talib would not relent:
The apostle continued on his way… In consequence, his relations with the Quraish [Meccans] deteriorated and men withdrew from him in enmity. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 168).
For thirteen years, the worst that ever happened to Muhammad at Mecca was that he had dust thrown on him by a heckler and was occasionally mocked while praying at the Kaaba. He continued to provoke the Meccans, at one point telling them that he had come to bring them "slaughter" (Tabari Vol. IV, page 101) This caused them to seize Muhammad in an attempt (by one named Uqba) to "throttle" him, but he was released unharmed almost immediately:
Then they left him. That is the worst that I ever saw the Quraish do to him. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 184).I asked 'Abdullah bin 'Amr bin Al-'As to inform me of the worst thing the pagans had done to Allah's Apostle. He said: "While Allah's Apostle was praying in the courtyard of the ka'ba, 'Uqba bin Abi Mu'ait came and seized Allah's Apostle by the shoulder and twisted his garment round his neck and throttled him severely. Abu Bakr came and seized 'Uqba's shoulder and threw him away from Allah's Apostle and said, "Would you kill a man because he says: 'My Lord is Allah,' and has come to you with clear Signs from your Lord?" (Bukhari 60:339)
Muhammad would have his opportunity to forgive the man who had seized him when Uqba was captured following the Battle of Badr. According to his biographers, the prophet of Islam chose instead to have him slaughtered even as the unarmed prisoner begged for his life.

The Hadith also confirms that Muhammad was not physically harmed by the Meccans:
Allah's Apostle said, "Doesn't it astonish you how Allah protects me from the Quraish's abusing and cursing? They abuse Mudhammam and curse Mudhammam while I am Muhammad (and not Mudhamma)" (Bukhari 56:733)
As mentioned in several places, the worst indignity that Muhammad endured was an episode in which Abu Jahl and others mocked him while he was praying by putting the intestines of an animal on his back (Bukhari 4:241). The men who did this were later killed by the Muslims.

Neither does the Quran provide any support for the contemporary thesis that Muhammad suffered physical abuse at Mecca, despite the many harsh things said about those who rejected him - the redundancy of which is so abundant in the Quran that it comprises the majority of the text.

There is also an entire Sura is devoted to describing the gruesome and sadistic torture awaiting Abu Lahab and his wife in hell, who are the only people mentioned by name in the Quran (other than Muhammad and his son-in-law Zaid). Yet, according to the authentic Hadith, their only crime was personal mockery of "the Messenger" at Mecca (Muslim 406, Bukhari 60:475).
3
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
Debunking Myths - Myths of Muhammad
Muhammad Never Killed Captives
"Our Prophet (peace be upon him) always showed the greatest mercy to those taken captive in battle. No hostages were ever harmed."
Truth:
Islamic terrorists take and execute hostages on an almost daily basis. While we are often assured that this practice has “nothing to do with Islam,” Muhammad did, in fact, execute prisoners of war and other hostages.

Following the Battle of Badr, several defenseless Meccans were slaughtered by Muhammad’s companions. These included a man named Umayya and his young son, who were taken prisoner by a Muslim (a former friend who tried to protect them), but were then set upon by a mob before they could be escorted to safety:
“I said (would you attack) my prisoners? But... The people formed a ring around us as I was protecting him. Then a man drew his sword and cut off his son’s foot so that he fell down and Umayya [the boy’s father] let out a cry such as I have never heard… They hewed them to pieces with their swords until they were dead.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 449)
Another heartwarming account of Islamic chivalry during the same battle concerns Abu Jahl, one of Muhammad’s arch-enemies at Mecca. He met his death as he lay defenseless. In this case, two Muslims took the opportunity to administer the death blow:
Mu’awwidh passed Abu Jahl as he lay there helpless and smote him until he left him at his last gasp. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 451)
Another Muslim named Abdullah then came by and put his foot on Abu Jahl’s neck and taunted him before decapitating him:
Then I cut off his head and brought it to the apostle saying, “This is the head of the enemy of Allah, Abu Jahl.”… I threw his head before the apostle and he gave thanks to Allah. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 451).

Apparently these companions of Muhammad were unaware that "Islam is against" killing captives. But who could really blame them? Not only did the prophet of Islam praise them for the slaughter, he also ordered the death of another captive brought before him.

Uqba bin Abu Mu’ayt pled for his life:
“When the apostle ordered him to be killed, Uqba said, “But who will look after my children, O Muhammad?” [Muhammad’s reply] “Hell.” The man was put to death. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 458)
Other captives were ransomed, but Uqba received special treatment because he had mocked Muhammad at Mecca. His crime was that he had thrown the entrails of a dead animal on Muhammad’s back as he was praying, to the amusement of other Meccans (Muslim 4422, Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 277). The prophet of Islam determined that this fraternity prank was worth killing over, and it became the first of several other occasions in which people were slain on Muhammad’s order merely for mocking him.
Interestingly, it appears that Muhammad regretted not killing all of his captives, instead of ransoming a few. Verse 8:67 of the Qur’an was “revealed” in the aftermath of Badr and says “It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land.”
The prophet of Islam went on to execute many other captives, most notoriously the 800 men and boys taken prisoner at Qurayza. His men also brutally murdered an elderly woman named Umm Qirfa after taking her prisoner following a raid on the tribe of Banu Fazara. According to al-Tabari she was killed by, “putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and driving them until thy rent her in two.” (The woman’s daughter was then doled out to one of her Muslim killers).
While it is common to hear Muslims claim that their religion is “against” killing hostages, the actual history of Islam proves that nothing could be further from the truth
4
1
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
"After keeping them secret for 14 years, the White House has finally released the 28 pages that were removed from the 2002 Congressional inquiry into the 9/11 attacks and withheld from the final 9/11 Commission Report. More puzzling than the elusive pages is why Obama released them, and specifically, why now."
More puzzling than the elusive pages from the Congressional 9/11 inquiry is why Obama released them, and specifically, why now. The president apparently believes it will burnish his legacy, embarrass his enemies and make permanent his diplomatic "accomplishments" with Iran. Reminding Americans of Saudi Arabia's Al-Qaeda connections, shortly after the one-year mark of the Iran nuclear deal and before the 15-year mark of 9/11, might also continue t...
2
1
Add a comment...

Anthony Küster

Shared publicly  - 
 
From the Religion of Peace
"Were it not for another Muslim, who drove his truck through 84 innocent souls in Nice, France, the story of the week might have been the 'honor killing' of Qandeel Baloch by her brother."
"A celebrity in Pakistan, Qandeel bravely defied patriarchy and clerics, and was murdered for wanting to live as an independent woman."
3
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
463 people
Frendly Weidberg's profile photo
Frederico Durando's profile photo
James McCullen XXIV's profile photo
Bob Williams's profile photo
harbhajansingh janchetna's profile photo
Doug Patriot's profile photo
Armin von Kink's profile photo
Mike Niccum's profile photo
Oppsidens Next Sea's profile photo
Links
Story
Tagline
The only way out of ignorance is awareness, which includes looking at the facts.
Introduction
The Qur'an Quick Guide

Quranic verses which preach cruelty, incite violence and disturb public tranquility- 
(2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)

Quranic verses which promote, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities-
(4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)

Quranic verses which insult other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities-
(5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25:27—29; 26:96—99; 3:85; 8:38; 31:13; 29:41—42; 37:22—25; 37:26—32; 25:17—19; 7:173; 21:66—67; 21:98—100; 16:20—21; 6:22—23; 6:40—41; 6:148; 2;221; 24:3)

Bragging rights
A phobia is an irrational fear, therefore "Islamophobic" is not an appropriate description of anybody who objects to it.
Basic Information
Gender
Male