Profile cover photo
Profile photo
M.G. How
166 followers -
Formally MGHOW
Formally MGHOW

166 followers
About
Posts

Post has attachment
+MisandryToday Seems relevant to offshoots like IBMOR, but every time +TFM does talk down to racist white nationalists, I don't see him use the same vigour for Muslims, or non-oriental Asians As he does for Jews. I'm not looking for virtue signalling, but just state the facts bro.

Muslim / immigrant Crime rates compared with a US or Canada stats for a baseline are plenty sufficient to paint a picture of reality.

Instead you get off the cuff remarks like "Shari'a promotes rape culture" or "Immigrants seize some European town" with no real numbers or distinction between current days or 1000's of years ago. War zones or normal status quo.

It's an attitude that is either apathy or a skewed pro-male stance. I can only guess the latter, since Afghan deployed vets probably don't want to broach the subject, getting some kind of emotional repulsivness from thinking about it.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
+MisandryToday how correct is this information?
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
Ibmor really bring some good points about the short-commings of mgtow, without resorting to lying about it or misrepresenting it.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
Just wanted to share one of my YouTube comments. Lot of talk about Muslims ordered to lie and such. But then out of the blue I got a stupid number on terrorists. So I felt it compelled to give an accurate reply.

-------


TheScotchaholic ... I think I see the problem. Your a bit hypocrisy stricken. Let me lead you by the hand and explain how criminality works. Your number of 32230 occurrences. Thats an absolute. But that's what feminists do. Give ratios instead of stats. Let break that number down the same way criminal activity gets broken down, yeah? We can both agree terrorism is a crime, right?

So as of 2010, there are 1.6 billion Muslims. Let's assume every terrorist incident included 10 active participants, even though it'll usually be 1 or 2 (you're only talking domestic terrorists right? Your not conflating the number with scirmishes during war against Iraq or afghanistan?) .

So terrorism criminality in Islam is about 20 per 100000 people. So about 5 times the US homicide rate. Shit, that's high. I must concede. Islam is definitely inherently violent.






















Oh wait.... You said since 9/11? So 16 years? Oh well then it's 1.3 per 100000 people per year. That's 1/4th the US homocide rate for 2016. It the rate expected of A normal European country (no immigrants, just the native population)


Well... I guess we found out how full of shit your argument was.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
... MGTOW ?
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
Dear John,

Luckily, this only applies to incorporated townships. Go rural, and these harpies won't be able to go through your file.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
So... The Duluth model gets damned by it's own Creator's quotes, in context.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
Major problem with these studies: law of large numbers and central limit theorem is not applicable to migrant/nationality because crimes are rare to begin with and the rates are calculated as per 100000. The problem: in most euro countries like Denmark or Netherlands, the MIGRANT population as a whole from predominantly Muslim countries is less than 500,000 people. So when you start breaking up crime categories by Muslim population estimates, you end up with values like 5 total criminal instances producing a rate of 20 per 100000 people per year per criminal activity category. But the non migrants contribute to rates like 0.8 per 100000. Even though their absolute values are 50-100 people for their respective categories.

It's far more likely that criminality occurs in higher degrees for those with lower income, rather than migrants of Muslim faith. Which FYI would also suffer from the same problem via the unapplicability of the law of large numbers and central limit theorem, but instead for the rich.

(i.e. rich people are far more likely to commit crimes than non-rich if you only compare the rich with other rich people, who in total only make up 1% of the population)


Or to say it more clearly, why does criminality drop severely in terms of rates when you look at crime stats for predominantly Muslim countries, but make a dramatic rise for migrated Muslims in predominantly non-Muslim countries?

The answer is sampling bias. Migrants are more likely to be poor. Poor people are more likely to commit crimes. You can measure this. But most stats become heavily influence from sampling bias once you get to extremes like small population sizes (as is the case with sampling directly from a further subgroup of migrants, and sampling from the top 1% of wealthy individuals)
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Public
All she needed to do was ask how she was in violation of her Teaching Assistance contract. Then, if they gave the appropriate clause, ask if this meant her contract was being terminated. Once they confirmed, she would need to ask for a letter confirming her termination with reasons cited.

Then she goes to court and sues for wrongful dismissal and wins. And the people being sued are the local steals workers (what university students unionize under) AND the university. So now the local has incentives to not rely on sjw bullshit for legal advice.
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded