Profile

Cover photo
Richard Sim
Lives in Vancouver, BC, Canada
641 followers|11,310 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
We're excited about today's launch of code.org. Built around the vision that every child deserves the opportunity to learn how to code, code.org is raising awareness around the need for students to learn programming skills and the opportunities available to them when they do. Google supports widespread access to CS education and we hope this new site helps bring more awareness about the importance of computing. 

Visit www.code.org to learn more and to sign a pledge of support for all students to have access to great computing classes.
4
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
I've seen JF around Vancouver HackSpace a few times (we're both members), and he's been talking about this a lot on the mailing list. Good to see an article about it!
Andrew Plumb originally shared:
 
JF's project is getting noticed!
1
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
My new precious :)~
2
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
mmmmmm
1
Richard Sim's profile photoKarl Schmidt's profile photoAsh Matheson's profile photoSven Bergström's profile photo
4 comments
 
I think there is one in the West End too (also new)
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
The LeCroy WaveAce series of low-end oscilloscopes are rebranded Atten units (<$350 on eBay for 100MHz/1GSa/s). Unlike Atten however, LeCroy provides 64-bit drivers for Windows - and they work just fine with the Atten units. Download/install EasyScope from LeCroy's website, and the drivers are in the EasyScope directory.
1
Artur Pawlak's profile photo
 
Kinda like buying a Porsche designed external drive, right?
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
641 people
Tom McGarry's profile photo
Remy Saville's profile photo
Julia Taylor-Hell's profile photo
Kenn Hoekstra's profile photo
Jodie Azhar's profile photo

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
Jean-Baptiste Quéru originally shared:
 
Dizzying but invisible depth

You just went to the Google home page.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit of about how browsers work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play HTTP, HTML, CSS, ECMAscript, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just connected your computer to www.google.com.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit about how networks work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play DNS, TCP, UDP, IP, Wifi, Ethernet, DOCSIS, OC, SONET, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just typed www.google.com in the location bar of your browser.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know a bit about how operating systems work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play a kernel, a USB host stack, an input dispatcher, an event handler, a font hinter, a sub-pixel rasterizer, a windowing system, a graphics driver, and more, all of those written in high-level languages that get processed by compilers, linkers, optimizers, interpreters, and more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Let's simplify.

You just pressed a key on your keyboard.

Simple, isn't it?

What just actually happened?

Well, when you know about bit about how input peripherals work, it's not quite that simple. You've just put into play a power regulator, a debouncer, an input multiplexer, a USB device stack, a USB hub stack, all of that implemented in a single chip. That chip is built around thinly sliced wafers of highly purified single-crystal silicon ingot, doped with minute quantities of other atoms that are blasted into the crystal structure, interconnected with multiple layers of aluminum or copper, that are deposited according to patterns of high-energy ultraviolet light that are focused to a precision of a fraction of a micron, connected to the outside world via thin gold wires, all inside a packaging made of a dimensionally and thermally stable resin. The doping patterns and the interconnects implement transistors, which are grouped together to create logic gates. In some parts of the chip, logic gates are combined to create arithmetic and bitwise functions, which are combined to create an ALU. In another part of the chip, logic gates are combined into bistable loops, which are lined up into rows, which are combined with selectors to create a register bank. In another part of the chip, logic gates are combined into bus controllers and instruction decoders and microcode to create an execution scheduler. In another part of the chip, they're combined into address and data multiplexers and timing circuitry to create a memory controller. There's even more. Those are actually such incredibly complex technologies that they'll make any engineer dizzy if they think about them too much, and such that no single company can deal with that entire complexity.

Can we simplify further?

In fact, very scarily, no, we can't. We can barely comprehend the complexity of a single chip in a computer keyboard, and yet there's no simpler level. The next step takes us to the software that is used to design the chip's logic, and that software itself has a level of complexity that requires to go back to the top of the loop.

Today's computers are so complex that they can only be designed and manufactured with slightly less complex computers. In turn the computers used for the design and manufacture are so complex that they themselves can only be designed and manufactured with slightly less complex computers. You'd have to go through many such loops to get back to a level that could possibly be re-built from scratch.

Once you start to understand how our modern devices work and how they're created, it's impossible to not be dizzy about the depth of everything that's involved, and to not be in awe about the fact that they work at all, when Murphy's law says that they simply shouldn't possibly work.

For non-technologists, this is all a black box. That is a great success of technology: all those layers of complexity are entirely hidden and people can use them without even knowing that they exist at all. That is the reason why many people can find computers so frustrating to use: there are so many things that can possibly go wrong that some of them inevitably will, but the complexity goes so deep that it's impossible for most users to be able to do anything about any error.

That is also why it's so hard for technologists and non-technologists to communicate together: technologists know too much about too many layers and non-technologists know too little about too few layers to be able to establish effective direct communication. The gap is so large that it's not even possible any more to have a single person be an intermediate between those two groups, and that's why e.g. we end up with those convoluted technical support call centers and their multiple tiers. Without such deep support structures, you end up with the frustrating situation that we see when end users have access to a bug database that is directly used by engineers: neither the end users nor the engineers get the information that they need to accomplish their goals.

That is why the mainstream press and the general population has talked so much about Steve Jobs' death and comparatively so little about Dennis Ritchie's: Steve's influence was at a layer that most people could see, while Dennis' was much deeper. On the one hand, I can imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Jobs did and the people he inspired: probably a bit less shiny, a bit more beige, a bit more square. Deep inside, though, our devices would still work the same way and do the same things. On the other hand, I literally can't imagine where the computing world would be without the work that Ritchie did and the people he inspired. By the mid 80s, Ritchie's influence had taken over, and even back then very little remained of the pre-Ritchie world.

Finally, last but not least, that is why our patent system is broken: technology has done such an amazing job at hiding its complexity that the people regulating and running the patent system are barely even aware of the complexity of what they're regulating and running. That's the ultimate bikeshedding: just like the proverbial discussions in the town hall about a nuclear power plant end up being about the paint color for the plant's bike shed, the patent discussions about modern computing systems end up being about screen sizes and icon ordering, because in both cases those are the only aspect that the people involved in the discussion are capable of discussing, even though they are irrelevant to the actual function of the overall system being discussed.
1
2
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
Martin Donlon originally shared:
 
High Altitude Balloon
1
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
Does anyone know what this is? It was going (very slowly) along a street downtown with a police escort.
1
Francois Chabot's profile photoPeter Andrews's profile photo
2 comments
 
I was in the downtown east side a few weeks ago when they were removing the tarp from this thing. Pretty crazy stuff!
Add a comment...

Richard Sim

Shared publicly  - 
 
The PCB Matrix LP Calculator is amazing for creating pcb footprints - I highly recommend it to anyone into electronics. Unfortunately the company was sold and the product is no longer free; however if you google "PCBM_LP_Calculator_V2010.zip" you can still find the last freeware version available for download! I grabbed it from some guy in China's SkyDrive. ;)
2
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
641 people
Tom McGarry's profile photo
Remy Saville's profile photo
Julia Taylor-Hell's profile photo
Kenn Hoekstra's profile photo
Jodie Azhar's profile photo
Work
Occupation
Senior Software Engineer - Graphics
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Story
Introduction
Graphics and technology programmer, embedded systems developer, and working towards engineerings a a robot army for world domination!
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Previously
Adelaide, SA, Australia