Profile cover photo
Profile photo
AnantaSesaDas
11 followers
11 followers
About
Communities and Collections
View all
Posts

Post has attachment

Post has shared content
Most of us think “perfect” memory means never forgetting, but maybe forgetting actually helps us navigate a world that is random and ever-changing.
So say two neuroscientists in a review published today in the journal Neuron.
The argument is that memory isn’t supposed to act like a video recorder, but instead like a list of useful rules that help us make better decisions says study co-author Blake Richards a University of Toronto professor who studies the theoretical links between artificial intelligence and neuroscience. So it makes sense that our brains would make us forget outdated, irrelevant information that might confuse us, or information that leads us astray.
We have yet to find the limits of what the human brain can store, and there’s more than enough room, so to speak, for us to remember everything. Still, the brain actually spends energy making us forget, by generating new neurons that “overwrite” the old ones, or by weakening the connections between neurons.
But why does it do so if our brains aren’t running out of space?

Firstly, forgetting old information can make us more efficient. In the new paper, Richards sites a 2016 study in which scientists trained mice to find a water maze. The maze location was moved, and then some of the mice were given a drug that helped them forget the original location. The mice who forgot the first round of training found the new maze more quickly. Just think about all the times you’ve memorized the wrong name, and then later wished that you could remove that memory and stop confusing it with the right name.
Forgetting old information can also keep us from generalizing too much from one piece of information. Here, there are many parallels with artificial intelligence and how these systems learn, according to Richards. If you teach a computer to recognize faces by making it memorize thousands of them, all it will do is learn the particulars of all the specific faces.
Then, when you expose it to a new face, the model won’t actually know it’s a face because it never learned the general rules. Instead of learning that faces are usually oval and have two eyes, a nose, and a mouth, it learned that some of these pictures have blue eyes and some of them have brown eyes and some have thicker lips and so on.
Human brains could run into this problem, too. Richards compared this to Funes the Memorious, a story by Jorge Luis Borges in which a man is cursed with perfect memory. Funes remembers in exquisite detail, but “doesn’t understand because everything he experiences is its own individual snapshot moment.” To fix this program, AI researchers use a technique called “regularization,” where they force the system to forget some of the details until they’re left with the core information they’re interested in: what is a face, what is a dog versus a cat, and so on.

The process of which, and how much, information the system should forget can be trial-and-error, both in humans and computers.
Our brains tend to forget memories of things that happened (episodic memories) more quickly than general knowledge (semantic memories).
In fact, episodic memories tend to fade fairly quickly anyway, knowing which shirt you wore six weeks ago is rarely helpful. Many different factors go into this: how novel the situation is, how much attention someone is paying, how much adrenaline is in the system.
The brain’s principle is to forget everything except those instances that were highly salient says Richards. Traumatic events like assault, for example, stick with us because the brain wants us to remember, and avoid, things that will help us survive.
Ultimately, says Richards, we often assume that memory is a good thing, but at the end of the day, our brains only do things if it was good for our survival from an evolutionary perspective. And in the case of memory, he adds, our brains probably have been shaped by evolution to only remember that stuff that is pertinent to our survival.
So maybe not being able to remember how you know someone is a feature of our brains, not a bug.

Post has shared content
+James, paying dues for membership in a group is how one can earn the basic income that such a group pays back to all its' members. dues wouldn't need to be monetary since that would defeat the purpose of the redistribution of that wealth.
Juha Jarvinen, an unemployed young father in a village near Jurva, western Finland, was picked at random to receive the payment, starting in January this year. He told the Economist that, unlike when he was receiving standard unemployment payments, he is now actively seeking work.

He had previously been offered a few part-time positions but taking them would make no sense, since it would jeopardise his welfare payments. “It is crazy, so no one will take a bit of work,” he said.

He said he is also in the process of starting a business, is much less stressed and no longer has to go through the “silly show” of filling out forms or attending regular interviews with employment agency officials.

Post has attachment
AnantaSesaDas commented on a post on Blogger.
Maybe a binder like flax meal or egg replacer can help the recipe stay together bett

Post has shared content
tolerance isn't a suicide pact
Tolerance is not a moral precept: It is a peace treaty.

We are brought up to believe that tolerating people is a basic moral good. But this simple approach fails, and can easily be used against us by people who say "Why won't you tolerate my intolerance?" This can happen in everything from our personal lives to the political arena. But it comes from a misunderstanding of what tolerance is.

The way to understand tolerance isn't as a moral absolute: it's as a peace treaty. The difference is that a peace treaty only applies when both sides abide by it.

This is an essay I've had brewing for some time.

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

+One Eyed King Here is a post to invite you to ask me what you think I was evading on the other post.

Post has attachment
therefore milk should come from at least progressive if not vedic tradition following farms.
Wait while more posts are being loaded