Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Giorgio Piacenza
145 followers
145 followers
About
Giorgio's posts

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Cómo las estructuras cerebrales se correlacionan a nuestras preferencias políticas

Post has attachment
Paulet from Peru quite likely invented a very useful rocket engine before Goddard

Post has attachment
¿QUE RELACIÓN EXISTE ENTRE ESTRUCTURAS CEREBRALES Y NUESTRAS TENDENCIAS POLÍTICAS? http://evolucionculturalcosmica.blogspot.pe/2017/03/tendencias-politicas-y-cerebro.html

Post has attachment
Diferencias cerebrales y actitudes políticas

Post has attachment
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT EXTRATERRESTRIALS? Can we grow up and learn to carefully study all of the information allegeldy presented about them?

Post has attachment
Extraterrestrials: Good? Bad? We need to try to think carefully, artfully and inclusively trying to find elements of truth and link them coherently together. What info out there' among the several narratives is more accurate? Generally speaking, I'm quite in agreement with Grant Cameron's recent exposition here shown in YouTube and I'm glad that he is mentioning FREE's survey. A more significant population of Experiencers anonymously informing about their encounters with NHIs and/or ETs beats what Tom de Long may have been told by a few government agents focusing on the negative perhaps for social control reasons.

We rely on a larger, varied, anonymously surrendered data base that surpasses specific interviews and selected cases that may reinforce a researcher's bias.

The fact that many respondents have been reached via Facebook and are sufficiently computer savvy might have some skewing effect but that is difficult to find out. Even if the population of FREE's respondents could also be somewhat skewed toward a positive sense of mission (because we may be dealing with individuals who are more motivated, capable and willing to respond to many questions through a computer connection), it is still, basically speaking, a large population that has not been coordinated to provide set responses or patterns. Thus, the statistics should be more objetive.

Dr. Greer's list of whistle blowers is also valid and necessary to learn from but he is obviously too biased toward all ET's being benign and positive and may have dismissed evidence to the contrary. That doesn't mean there isn't good and important disclosure and information in what he presents and some other aspects that add to the whole "enchilada." And I hope that by merely considering that SOME ETs may not be benevolent I'm not engaging in one more case of Xenophobia as Dr. Greer (with some reason to it) is keen to manifest.

And, what about the conscept that if "they" were aggressive or violent "they" would have invaded us or worse a long time ago? Well, what f "they" are not a single group or species,civilization, race or even various groups, species, races or civilizations with the same general behavior. And that is what a balanced assessment of multiple information sources suggests; Multiplicity. And if we are talking about multiplicity, then there might as well exist a "balance of power" or a protective force, at least in terms of who is trying to interven on Earth.


If any one civilization overstepped its boundaries, it could have serious consequences,thus, one possibility is that different civilizations are perhaps allowed to carry on with their plans and actitivities as long as none seriously curtail the plans of the others. And who we end up allying ourselves with (the more physical-like repeating human warfare patterns or the more consciousness and spiritual unity-based ones overcoming duality) would determine what civilizations prevail or remain on Earth in case they were already competing for Earth and humanity as resources for various reasons. Thus, it is easy to assess in an incomplete way in this menagerie of plausible ET and/or NHI beings.

However, FREE's results, probably represent a more balanced assessment: That SOME ET's (a minority) may not be agreeable and benign to the highest sacred aspirations of the human species, according to experiencers. Others may be sort of neutral and still others friendly, respectful. But, in the most, positive personality changes and an expansion in appreciation about life have occurred. Healings have occurred. Sometimes information has been given. Many experiencers don't want to stop having experiences.

Reports of benevolence and malevolence are also supported by considering a wide range of evidence including individual contactee, historical/legendary, some whistle blowers reports. And, indeed, many forms of evidence need to be considered. The evidence is dispersed for the picking according to our own preferences but, in order to see the whole picture, we need to overcome a major problem in human relations: The tendency of mutual dismissal. Someone may say something false and/or something true or partially true but which we don't like because it challenges what we have come to believe and we'll atomatically stop listening for the elements of truth that person may offer. And life is an offering. Thus, in the experiencer, religious and political realms we disconnect too much specially when we need to grow up and understand the connections more than ever.

The variety of beings also is a universal pattern given in our world's myths, legends, and esoteric and historical traditions. Moreover, even some contactees (allegedly communicating with helpful and pro-human-evolution "benevolent" extraterrestrials and/or NHIs), contend that there exist a variety of ETs are not in for our best/highest interest. We don't know for sure, but we cannot exclude the possibility there may be many classes of negative ETs even if they may not be as involved in direct contact with humans as the majority of ETs. Explicitly negative ETs and or NHIs may exist but as per their contacting experiencers in our FREE survey they are deemed to be a minority. Nonetheless, this to be taken into account to try to see the overall picture.

When a complex subject affects our core beliefs, self-identities and preferences, there is a strong tendency to make sense by simplifying, by subconsciously selecting what we want to hear and continue validating it linearly and wholistically over time. Our human minds demand explanations and some of us are less prone to tolerate ambiguity. And -perhaps due to survival pressures accumulated over eons in our species - negativity is always an attention-getter and - just as in the news - it tends to be over emphasized. Often, some fundamentalist religious biases also affect how many individuals would judge intelligent, non-human beings...for instance, perhaps as deceiving supernatural devils. Thus, a partial truth that applies to some otherworldly cases is generalized.

I wonder about Tom de Long's religious affiliation, if any. Speculating on the issue, the military operatives he may be communicating with may be partially correct in being defensive against some of the ETs, but perhaps even these operatives may not be completely informed. They may also have a well-established "us vs. them" mindset and could perhaps be propitiating a negative bias useful for a highly skewed "disclosure" in which a large percentage of the population (many already in President Trump's base?) would - patriotically motivated - fall for, align with and support the official version.

But could some of what is "leaked" (perhaps as a need for Earth forces to self-defend against some ETs without completely relying upon extraterrestrial protective forces) be a genuine reality or itemto consider? Perhaps. I am not willing to discard any major narratives even if they contradict or seem to contradict others of my preference.

Could SOME or much of what is being "disclosed" as the "Secret Space Program," for instance as researched by Dr. Michael Salla (William Tompkins, Corey Goode), be truthful? Perhaps Goode's and Tompkins accounts of negative reptilian ETs refer to some of the minority of cases deemed as "negative" in FREEs provisional results. These being may be more abundant but not interact as much with individual experiencers or they may be less abundant but also engage in military and other activities rather than in human contacts and/or abductions. In fact, we need to study the whole situation and multiple testimonies quite carefully. We need to compare and cross-examine information and - in most cases - withold blanket dismissal. We also need to make personal and collective contact and find out for ourselves.

For the record: Even if FREE's results (relying on anonymity and mostly conscious recall), more probably represents a more balanced assessment, we shouldn't think of it as "definitive" (and fall into our own unrecognized biases), especially if it contradicts other research, particular experiences, military accounts, whistle blower declarations, archaeological finds and perhaps some documents that emphasize the negative.

Whatever our personal biases are, WE MUST STILL LISTEN TO EACH OTHER! Our offhanded,dismissing attitudes must be re-educated. Many of those sources that bring up more of the genuine or imagined (but hynotizing/entertaining/ attractive/entrancing) "negative" aspects might be dealing more actively with a situation that corresponds to that minority of negative ET's and/or NHIs that show up in our FREE survey. It may be that negative ET/NHIs do not engage in experiencer contact and abductions or, quite simply, that there aren't that many of them. We shouldn't close off to what they are also saying but neither fall for their excessive emphasis on seeing too much as negativity and conflict.
Giorgio Piacenza

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk8uJcaRtgg&t=6554s

Post has attachment
Consciousness, psychic capacities and intelligence assessments: Gradual revelations. La consciencia, la capacidad psíquica y las evaluaciones de inteligencia: graduales revelaciones https://www.wired.com/2017/01/ufos-psychics-spies-cia-just-put-12m-pages-files-online-start/

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded