- Research Director, 2001 - present
- SunSenior Scientist, 1991 - 1994
- HarlequinChief Designer, 1994 - 1996
- JungleeChief Scientist, 1996 - 1998
- NASADivision Chief, 1998 - 2001
Peter Norvig is a Fellow of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence and the Association for Computing Machinery. At Google Inc he was Director of Search Quality, responsible for the core web search algorithms from 2002-2005, and has been Director of Research from 2005 on.
Previously he was the head of the Computational Sciences Division at NASA Ames Research Center, making him NASA's senior computer scientist. He received the NASA Exceptional Achievement Award in 2001. He has served as an assistant professor at the University of Southern California and a research faculty member at the University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Department, from which he received a Ph.D. in 1986 and the distinguished alumni award in 2006. He has over fifty publications in Computer Science, concentrating on Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing and Software Engineering, including the booksArtificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (the leading textbook in the field), Paradigms of AI Programming: Case Studies in Common Lisp, Verbmobil: A Translation System for Face-to-Face Dialog, and Intelligent Help Systems for UNIX. He is also the author of the Gettysburg Powerpoint Presentation and the world's longest palindromic sentence.
- BrownApplied Math, 1974 - 1978
- BerkeleyComputer Science, 1980 - 1985
"In an influential keynote that Brown University professor Andreas van Dam delivered to the ACM Hypertext conference in 1987, he said: The reason I encouraged such annotations [in FRESS] was that I remembered that when I was in college with Ted [Nelson], I would always grab the dirtiest copy of a book from the library, rather than the cleanest one , because the dirtiest ones had the most marginalia, which I found helpful (van Dam 1988)."
Start reading this book for free: http://amzn.to/1IEgnW5
But this Forbes analysis is a little better if you can handle the excruciating prose: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/05/25/warren-buffetts-right-but-not-correct-raise-the-eitc-not-the-minimum-wage/
The hypothesis I would like to test is whether the EITC is better than a direct unemployment safety net providing a living wage, which many European countries have but Buffett says will reduce employment incentives.
If only there were some way to strongly encourage people from two different US states to try strong attempts for each alternative so that the actual outcomes could be observed. Maybe there is some way to reach a large number of people to perform such an experiment. Hint, hint!