Profile

Cover photo
Aaron Sedley
Works at Google
Attended Wesleyan University
Lives in San Francisco
849 followers|42,631 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Change aversion on the horizon...
1
John VanRoekel's profile photoAaron Sedley's profile photo
2 comments
 
Great point, +John VanRoekel! It's critical to differentiate temporary change aversion from lasting product degradation. The latter reflects errant product strategy & development, not just poor launch planning.
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
I'm grateful to play a small part in Google's robust efforts to understand online privacy, protect users, and earn their trust.
 
Privacy and surprises never mix
Posted by +Jessica Staddon, Staff Research Scientist 

"No surprises!" is as much of a mantra in privacy-aware design as it is in effective management. If a user's perception of a data source or service is not compatible with usage, then privacy problems may arise. This raises the question of how we can untangle perception from behavior, especially given that user perceptions are context-dependent and potentially dynamic.

This is an ongoing conversation at Google and we’ve participated in three talks in recent weeks to try to bring clarity to the murky waters of privacy and perception.

First, we hosted Miguel Malheiros (PhD student at University College of London) at our London office. Miguel discussed how the perceived fairness of data usage and relevance of a data request impact a user's decision to disclose information.

On our Mountain View campus, +Arvind Narayanan (Post-doctoral researcher at Stanford) spoke about the limitations of technology-centric privacy approaches. One example he cited is that users perceive privacy harm when their information is made easier to find, even when data permissions are actually unchanged. His talk was based on emerging research including this paper titled “Obscurity by Design”: http://fredstutzman.com/papers/CSCW2012W_Stutzman.pdf.

Finally, Googler +Larkin Brown spoke at last month’s Symposium of Usable Privacy & Security (http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups/2012/) on research showing that user privacy concerns and low engagement on social networks are strongly associated. The below graph depicts this research, which is elaborated on in this paper: http://goo.gl/yQyiW.

These talks attest to the importance of understanding users who perceive privacy risk and suggest that we may be able to identify such users based on observed behaviors. Fleshing out both of these is a key part of our ongoing privacy research agenda at Google.
11 comments on original post
2
1
Mike Efron's profile photo
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Social Polling: easy and interesting, but how representative?
1
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Modern Times, still so relevant.
Murali Veeraiyan originally shared:
 
One of the best scenes ever by Charlie Chaplin. I absolutely love this movie.
View original post
1
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
1
Aaron Sedley's profile photoEric Meyerson's profile photo
2 comments
 
Yowza.
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
When the only department store in Saranac Lake, N.Y., closed down, residents did something unusual: they decided to raise capital to open their own department store.
1
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
849 people
Angela Baker's profile photo
Oliver Deighton's profile photo
yeliz yelmen's profile photo
abdoelrhman mohammed's profile photo
Manju HK's profile photo
Yeri Holo's profile photo
Arjun Rungta's profile photo
Michelle Staley's profile photo
Karen Wickre's profile photo

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Join us at UX Australia to learn about survey best practices, and leveraging surveys for user research!
 
Interested in becoming a savvy user of surveys and feedback forms?
Would like to avoid pitfalls that can result in bad data & misguided decisions?

Join +Aaron Sedley, +Elizabeth Ferrall-Nunge, and myself at the UX Australia conference in Brisbane on August 27, for our half-day workshop on using surveys for user experience research.

We'll cover the following topics, among others:
-- When to use surveys (and when not to)
-- Sources of bias in surveys
-- Criteria for assessing the quality of survey metrics
-- Differences between surveys and feedback forms
-- How to plan an effective survey: research goals and constructs
-- Sampling methods
-- Questionnaire design best practices
-- Fielding surveys, and choosing among survey tools
-- Considerations for online surveys
-- Fundamentals of survey analysis

During the workshop, you'll apply what you've learned with a series of interactive exercises. Plus, you'll get handouts summarizing survey best practices, and a questionnaire template to use for your own research.

This workshop will expand your research toolkit, teach you to gather user-centric metrics and insights with surveys, and let you uncover actionable insights to optimize users' experiences and the success of your products.

Register here: http://register.uxaustralia.com.au/register/attendee
View original post
2
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
A few months ago I posted to designstaff.org about change aversion (http://goo.gl/LqIMx). Jared Spool recently commented on it  (http://goo.gl/bWuoN); below is my response:

Hi Jared, thanks for commenting on my post and for moving the public discussion of change aversion forward. Although your headline suggests otherwise, a fair reading of our articles shows that we agree more than disagree about the roots of this phenomenon, and about methods to minimize it. 

For starters, we agree on a major cause of change aversion. As you put it, users don’t like to feel stupid. I wrote that "When products change and advanced users suddenly become novices, you should expect anxiety to result." We also both point to sudden, unannounced changes and lack of control as further sources of discomfort. UI changes decrease user control, and necessitate re-learning. Learning takes effort, and therefore UI change invariably comes with cost to users. As Kahneman and Tversky famously note, losses loom larger than gains (http://goo.gl/VKfvk); this is borne out in change aversion.

We also echo each other’s advice to communicate the nature and value of changes, to let users switch between old and new versions, and to avoid “change-for-change's-sake”. The crux of successful UI change is the simultaneous presentation of clear benefits that outweigh inherent re-learning costs. Using BJ’s example of a teenage girl getting her first cell phone, learning the cell phone UI takes effort, but this effort is far outweighed by the newfound ability to communicate with friends. 

We don’t always get change right at Google. In fact, I started thinking about change aversion after seeing several companies, including Google, launch changes which angered many users. In these cases, the costs of change were too high and the benefits were too low, or unclear to users. We do, however, consistently strive to minimize cost and maximize benefit. One strategy to minimize cost -- as you astutely point out -- is incremental change driven by A/B experiments, which are a staple of our user testing strategy. Google constantly evaluates a multitude of potential changes and frequently launches small improvements that enhance user experience. As you also mention, when we do them well, people don’t even realize anything has changed.

Yet some types of change aren’t invisible, and can't be subtly implemented one shade at a time, like your account of how eBay shifted its background color (http://goo.gl/1NQMB). There are also technical reasons for launching changes non-incrementally, and Google often pairs visual changes with major back-end shifts. 

Although most of our attention has focused on UI change, there are additional flavors of design change that deserve mention. Visual design, information architecture, and technological change all come with unique costs and potential benefits. For example, major visual redesigns like Google's cross-product 'Kennedy' redesign (explained here by Google's Search UX Lead Jon Wiley: http://goo.gl/FQ7E8) do not exact as large a re-learning cost from users, but may not provide as great a benefit as architectural UI changes, such as the 2009 AdWords redesign (http://goo.gl/JoAub). The mere exposure effect, demonstrated by Zajonc in 1968 (http://goo.gl/VmlqQ), helps explain change aversion and increased acceptance over time, especially for visual design changes. And with any change, if users' attitudes don’t reach a higher baseline after they learn and adjust, the costs have likely outweighed the benefits.

Major change to familiar products can be risky, but positive change is absolutely necessary, especially in the rapidly evolving online milieu. To quote Heraclitus, “The only constant is change.” Successful designers and researchers embrace change, minimize its costs, and maximize its benefits to users. The willingness to embrace change is critical, because the option to remain static is an illusion. Heraclitus also said that “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.” Even if our products do not change, judgments about them will, as our users and the technology environment continue to evolve.

Thank you again for your comments. I’m pleased that we’ve identified consistent sources of change aversion and prescribed similar actions to mitigate users’ pain. I hope that our discussion has moved the field forward, has given our audience new ways of thinking about managing change that will happen with or without our efforts, and leads to more positive experiences for all of our users.

--Aaron Sedley
If we take the post written by Google UX Researcher Aaron Sedley as Google's philosophy on why users get upset at design changes, then we can easily understand why users get upset when Google makes ch...
23
6
Allard van Helbergen's profile photoTomer Sharon's profile photo
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
4
Bob O`Bob's profile photo
 
Sometimes, this is what change feels like, to loyal early adopters:
http://abstrusegoose.com/398
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
No kittens were harmed in the making of this video. Only humiliated.

http://youtu.be/gwcD7t-CfHo
1
1
Cisco DeVries's profile photoHarvey Tabia's profile photo
 
That is pretty cool. I wonder why no one thought to put videos of cute kittens on the internet before?
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/05/kgo-radio-format-change_n_1129961.html

Sad time for Bay Area radio. In particular, Gene Burns was a great host, debater, and paragon of civility. And I grew up listening to Dr. Bill Wattenburg's wonderfully eclectic 'open line to the west coast'. end of an era. #changeaversion
2
1
Eric Meyerson's profile photoPatrick Larvie's profile photoAaron Sedley's profile photo
6 comments
 
yup, the switch from weekly diaries to the PPM (portable people meter) heralded KGO's demise, at least among advertisers. I imagine PPM is more accurate, and reduces bias from lack of diary diligence and recall error. Not sure about other aspects, I'd guess it's RDD-based probability sample, but there are a lot of details that matter.

What I question most is the analysis that went into this decision by KGO's new owner Cumulus. KCBS is already established for 24/7 local news, KGO's niche (and listenership) was news/talk.

cool idea about attention monitoring, maybe though EEG/GSR methods. we could then see which hosts/topics engage listeners the most.
Add a comment...

Aaron Sedley

Shared publicly  - 
 
Joseph Lee originally shared:
 
Today's lunch post is sure to inspire with this Barack Obama sushi brought to you by master sushi chef Kawasumi-sensei who teaches at Tokyo University. Even from one as experienced as he, it took a lot of trial and error to get the perfect results. Leaving no detail out, he even included the president's oversized ears. You can see the process he took to make this detailed sushi, but you'll have to translate it to english first. Be warned, once you take a bite you'll come Barack for more!

http://feature.jp.msn.com/skill/special/article/oowaza/week015/003.htm
21 comments on original post
1
3
Sheela Subramanian's profile photoRicardo Prada's profile photo
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
849 people
Angela Baker's profile photo
Oliver Deighton's profile photo
yeliz yelmen's profile photo
abdoelrhman mohammed's profile photo
Manju HK's profile photo
Yeri Holo's profile photo
Arjun Rungta's profile photo
Michelle Staley's profile photo
Karen Wickre's profile photo
Education
  • Wesleyan University
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Work
Occupation
Sr. User Experience Researcher
Employment
  • Google
    User Experience Researcher, present
  • New York Times Digital
  • Young & Rubicam
  • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • Clinton/Gore '96
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
San Francisco
Links
Contributor to