Profile cover photo
Profile photo
John Riddle
353 followers -
Let your Geek Flag fly.
Let your Geek Flag fly.

353 followers
About
John's posts

Post has attachment
President Trump doesn’t want to spend federal dollars on after-school programs, meals for poor people, or heating assistance that helps keep folks alive. But he has no problem wasting more than $3 million a pop to spend weekends at his private Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. Trump has already made four trips there since becoming president on January 20, and on Friday he confirmed he’s headed there this weekend for the fifth time.

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-mar-a-lago-trump-branded-properties-weekends-41d373bbe97a#.vt26lyjhd

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
I could do without the fire effects, but this is a great explanation as to why Clinton should be prosecuted and not allowed to hold office.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lDN5b6ET0I

Post has attachment
Bernie Sanders warning Obama about Panama in 2011...

"Finally, Mr. President, let's talk about the Panama Free Trade Agreement.
Panama's entire annual economic output is only $26.7 billion a year, or about two-tenths of one percent of the U.S. economy. No-one can legitimately make the claim that approving this free trade agreement will significantly increase American jobs.
Then, why would we be considering a stand-alone free trade agreement with this country?
Well, it turns out that Panama is a world leader when it comes to allowing wealthy Americans and large corporations to evade U.S. taxes by stashing their cash in off-shore tax havens. And, the Panama Free Trade Agreement would make this bad situation much worse.
Each and every year, the wealthy and large corporations evade $100 billion in U.S. taxes through abusive and illegal offshore tax havens in Panama and other countries.
According to Citizens for Tax Justice, "A tax haven . . . has one of three characteristics: It has no income tax or a very low-rate income tax; it has bank secrecy laws; and it has a history of non-cooperation with other countries on exchanging information about tax matters. Panama has all three of those. ... They're probably the worst."
Mr. President, the trade agreement with Panama would effectively bar the U.S. from cracking down on illegal and abusive offshore tax havens in Panama. In fact, combating tax haven abuse in Panama would be a violation of this free trade agreement, exposing the U.S. to fines from international authorities.
In 2008, the Government Accountability Office said that 17 of the 100 largest American companies were operating a total of 42 subsidiaries in Panama. This free trade agreement would make it easier for the wealthy and large corporations to avoid paying U.S. taxes and it must be defeated. At a time when we have a record-breaking $14.7 trillion national debt and an unsustainable federal deficit, the last thing that we should be doing is making it easier for the wealthiest people and most profitable corporations in this country to avoid paying their fair share in taxes by setting-up offshore tax havens in Panama.
Adding insult to injury, Mr. President, the Panama FTA would require the United States to waive Buy America requirements for procurement bids from thousands of foreign firms, including many Chinese firms, incorporated in this major tax haven. That may make sense to China, it does not make sense to me.
Finally, Panama is also listed by the State Department as a major venue for Mexican and Colombian drug cartel money laundering. Should we be rewarding this country with a free trade agreement? I think the answer should be a resounding no."

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senate-speech-by-sen-bernie-sanders-on-unfettered-free-trade

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Here's a fantastic response to the explanation of why, after Clinton lost by 22% to Sanders in the NH Primary, she still came away with the same number of delegates.

DNC Chair, Wasserman Shultz: “Unpledged delegates exist, really, to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists,"

Reddit user, /u/Bearracuda: "It blows me away that she gave this answer on national television. "Grassroots activists" are candidates who have the OVERWHELMING support of the people!! She basically just admitted on national television that superdelegates exist so that entrenched party leaders can continue winning elections even when they no longer have the support of the people!!"

American "Democracy" at work ladies and gentlemen.

Post has attachment
Little intense, gets a little flustered, but a brilliant and concise answer to the question, "Why should we go to Mars?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plTRdGF-ycs

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded