Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Jim Maerk
25 followers
25 followers
About
Jim's posts

Liberals at Facebook are still at it!!!!

Okay, so here's the issue:
Facebook has blocked me from making any posts because I broke their community rules, here's what I said:
Concerning the newly reported Texas Christian bakers that have come under attack but he LGBT militants for refusing to bake a wedding cake (yeah, here we go again!) I said these gay morons seem to be searching out Christian Bakeries for the purpose of suing them. The Gay Lottery!
THAT, got me a 24 hour ban from posting.

Forget that the Black Lives Matters sites post calls for the killings of White Americans, Islamic Terrorists post boastful posts containing videos of them beheading Christians, all the HATE from LBGT sites towards anyone with morals, etc, etc, etc, THOSE posts are FACEBOOK APPROVED!

But ban me because I call Gays "morons" and called their suing Christian bakers as "the Gay Lottery", THAT, is ban worthy.

Well, SUCK IT FACEBOOK you bunch of Liberal, Gay Loving, Islamic Terrorist supporting, butt sucking idiots.

Stick this one finger salute up your crack!!!!

That is all, thank you.

PS, feel free to share this on FACEBOOK!!!!

Okay, so here's the issue:
Facebook has blocked me from making any posts because I broke their community rules, here's what I said:
Concerning the newly reported Texas Christian bakers that have come under attack but he LGBT militants for refusing to bake a wedding cake (yeah, here we go again!) I said these gay morons seem to be searching out Christian Bakeries for the purpose of suing them. The Gay Lottery!
THAT, got me a 24 hour ban from posting.

Forget that the Black Lives Matters sites post calls for the killings of White Americans, Islamic Terrorists post boastful posts containing videos of them beheading Christians, all the HATE from LBGT sites towards anyone with morals, etc, etc, etc, THOSE posts are FACEBOOK APPROVED!

But ban me because I call Gays "morons" and called their suing Christian bakers as "the Gay Lottery", THAT, is ban worthy.

Well, SUCK IT FACEBOOK you bunch of Liberal, Gay Loving, Islamic Terrorist supporting, butt sucking idiots.

Stick this one finger salute up your crack!!!!

That is all, thank you.

PS, feel free to share this on FACEBOOK!!!!

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has attachment
I just finished building this from a kit.
Replica of a 1863 Remington Pocket Pistol.
Photo

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has attachment
“Shall Not Be Infringed”

This is America, we have a Constitution and part of it says: 
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Key here being "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".
Now, with all they could have said, why would the Framers say that? Is that included with any other Amendment? Is that added to any other Right? Why would they include this in the 2nd Amendment, "Shall NOT be infringed."?
Could it be because they knew, that out of all the other rights, this one, these 27 words out of all the rest, would be the one future Politicians would try to remove, limit and/or change?
The problem most or all opponents of the 2nd Amendment have is interpretation. "It doesn't mean this or that", they say. "It really means this or that", they'll argue. But in reality, it means exactly what it says and says exactly what it means and to make sure no one tries to say otherwise or change it, the Framers added "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."
To change, limit and/or take away the 2nd Amendment is unconstitutional, plain and simple.
Photo

Post has attachment
“Shall Not Be Infringed”
This is America, we have a Constitution and part of it says: 
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Key here being "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". Now, with all they could have said, why would the Framers say that? Is that included with any other Amendment? Is that added to any other Right? Why would they include this in the 2nd Amendment, "Shall NOT be infringed."?
Could it be because they knew, that out of all the other rights, this one, these 27 words out of all the rest, would be the one future Politicians would try to remove, limit and/or change?
The problem most or all opponents of the 2nd Amendment have is interpretation. "It doesn't mean this or that", they say. "It really means this or that", they'll argue. But in reality, it means exactly what it says and says exactly what it means and to make sure no one tries to say otherwise or change it, the Framers added "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."
To change, limit and/or take away the 2nd Amendment is unconstitutional, plain and simple.
Photo

Post has attachment
“Shall Not Be Infringed”
This is America, we have a Constitution and part of it says: 
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Key here being "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". Now, with all they could have said, why would the Framers say that? Is that included with any other Amendment? Is that added to any other Right? Why would they include this in the 2nd Amendment, "Shall NOT be infringed."?
Could it be because they knew, that out of all the other rights, this one, these 27 words out of all the rest, would be the one future Politicians would try to remove, limit and/or change?
The problem most or all opponents of the 2nd Amendment have is interpretation. "It doesn't mean this or that", they say. "It really means this or that", they'll argue. But in reality, it means exactly what it says and says exactly what it means and to make sure no one tries to say otherwise or change it, the Framers added "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."
To change, limit and/or take away the 2nd Amendment is unconstitutional, plain and simple.
Photo
Wait while more posts are being loaded