Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Jeffry Weiss


The march in Paris was to show a untied front in the face of radial Islam and violent Jihad.  First, there is no radical Islam or violent Jihad.  There is only Islam and Jihad.  All Islam and all jihad is a path and a religion that has as their fundamental roots the conquering of all non Muslim countries, the killing of all Christians, Jews, and non-believers, the installation of Sharia law in the world, and the establishment of a universal Caliphate.

Second, Barak Obama is not the first Black president; he is the first Muslim president.  He would never show support against his true brothers.  For those of you who are skeptical, read the texts listing the 160 senior appointments he made of Islamists into senior positions of national security with direct ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, or the deletion from one thousand documents and presentations from counter-terrorism training manuals of the FBI and other agencies (military, CIA, NSA) manuals of the mention of Jihad or Islam.  He has instructed that Christian fundamentalists and Zionists be recognized as radial groups and said that soldiers supporting those groups would be court marshaled.  His family in Africa is promoting Sharia law and other extreme forms of Islam.

It all makes perfect sense if you realize that Obama is not the first Black president, but the first Islamist president.  He has done a hundred times more for Muslims than he has for his “black brothers.”

Because Americans do not operate in the same time frames as Muslims, few see the danger.  After all, is Obama going to open our ports to ISIS boats and have them escorted to the state capitals?  Islam’s plans are not based on ISIS coming over in boats and attacking our shores.

When Americans think of danger, they are referring to immediate danger.  They do not think in longer time frames.  Muslims have waited 900 years to reach ‘Stage 3.”  They will wait, building an economic and political base from which they can exert more power.

America is focused on a military war which Islam wages a war of slow and subtle progress toward 

England is twenty years ahead of us in regards to Muslim infiltration of society.  They are the police in certain areas of England, there are Shari courts; they have pushed for and gotten laws changed or adapted to fit the reaching of Muhammad.  And they are only three million, or 4.6% of the population.  But the U.S. is quickly catching up with 2.6 million, or .8% of the population.

It bothers me greatly that some speak up for Islam, saying it is not a violent religion and that Muslims only want peace.  Yes, there are peaceful Muslims, but they are far outnumbered by the extreme Islamists who seek to destroy the West and install Sharia law.

For those skeptics, here are “just a few” of the verses from the Qur’an:

“Chapter 2, verse 191: ‘Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.’
“Chapter 9, verse 123: ‘Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.’
“Chapter 9, verse 5: ‘When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.’
“Chapter 9, verse 29: ‘Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam.’”
“Chapter 3, verse 85: ‘Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.’
“Chapter 9, verse 30: ‘The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.’
“Chapter 5, verse 33: ‘Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam.’
“Chapter 22, verse 19: ‘Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.’
“Chapter 47, verse 4: ‘Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.’
“Chapter 3, verse 28: ‘Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.’
“Chapter 8, verse 12: ‘Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.’
“Chapter 8, verse 60: ‘Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.’
“Chapter 2, verse 191: ‘And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out.’

Muslim extremism is a very serious problem, not remedied by a single program.  However, in order to solve a problem we must recognize its origin and accept its spoken and written goals.  That is a starting point.  We must not and cannot project what we think and feel on to others very different than ourselves.  Start with the current reality: Mosques and madrassas teach hate.  Islam wants to conquer all non-Muslim countries.  Sharia law must be the only law.  Non-Muslims must not be allowed to live.  That is the reality. 

Since October 2011, on direct orders from the White House, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents.  No more surveillance or undercover sting operations without the highest level approval from a special oversight body at the justice department dubbed the “Sensitive Operations review committee.”

To skeptics and humanitarians who may see this as prejudice or promoting a policy of retaliation, I am only repeating what Muslims themselves have said.  A renowned Muslim cleric, Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani visited 114 mosques in the United States.  He then testified before a State Department open form in January of 1999 and said 80% of mosques and madrassas teach extremist ideology, specifically hate toward, and death of, non-believers.

In 2011 came another study showing that only 19% of mosques in the United States DON’T teach jihad violence and / or Islamic supremacy.

Barack Obama has said that it is not Islamist who conduct terrorism, but extremists who do not represent the Muslim community and who do not interpret the Qur’an correctly.  This contradicts the statements of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mastermind of the 9/11 attacks said in court.  “Many thanks to God for this kind of gesture, and choosing us (he and his co-defendants) to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.  Therefore, killing you and fighting you, and destroying you, responding back to your attacks, are considered to be a great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to God.  It is the imposed duty on all Muslims who are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing of innocent and occupying their lands and holy sites.”

From the Time Square bomber, “Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s course, with full force of members and weaponry, is given upmost importance in Islam.  By Jihad, Islam is established.  By abandoning Jihad, Islam is destroyed.  Jihad is an obligation and duty in Islam on every Muslim.”  He finished by saying, “You can’t catch us all.”

In a complete lack of understanding and appreciation for the Obama responded in June of 2009 by saying, “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the Untied States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

It is important to know that Islam is a political religion that has, as its stated goal, espoused by the Muslim Brotherhood, “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.  And destroying its miserable house so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.

Former FBI special agent John Guandolo warned, “What we are seeing, not just inside the White House, but inside government entities, the national security entities, the State department, is a strong push by the Muslim brotherhood to get their people not just into operational positions, but policy positions – deeper, long term, bureaucratic positions

Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine stated in 2012, “That six highly placed Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators within the Obama Administration had transformed the United States from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and mot important supported of the Muslim brotherhood.”

CIA Director, John Brennan, espousing policy for Barack Obama, said that violent jihad was not a legitimate tenant of Islam and that killing innocent people is not condoned by Islam, was gravely mistaken because Islam does not consider non-Muslims as innocent.  So Islam’s prohibition on killing innocents does not apply.  Both men ignored the extensive evidence to the contrary in Islamic theology.

Brennan further explained that spiritual jihad was the greater jihad in Islam.  However that has no basis in Islamic Theology.  Al-Qaeda cofounder Abdullah Azzam said, "There is no greater jihad or lesser jihad; that is a myth., there is only jihad.”

While expunging any mention of Jihad and Islam from government manuals, the Obama Administration added Evangelical Christian, Ultra-orthodox Jews, and Catholics to its list of terrorist groups.  Defense department literature identified the Founding Fathers as “extremists.”

When Asst. Attorney General Tom Perez, of the justice's department of Civil rights was asked by congress if the Obama administration would ever entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion, he refused to answer.

A renowned Muslim scholar, Maulana Bulandshahri, explained, “The worst sins are infidelity and Polytheism which constitute rebellion against Allah, the Creator.  To eradicate these, Muslims are required to wage war until there exists none of it in the world and the only religion is that of Allah.

Based on the Qur’an, Muslim law may change based on circumstances.  “We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except to bring forth one better than it.”

Hamza Tzortzis, head of British Islamic education, has said, “We as Muslims reject the idea of freedom of speech and even the idea of freedom.”  Islamic law condones stoning, amputations, institutionalized oppression of women, the denial of free speech, the death penalty of apostasy. In addition, Muslims practice genital mutilation, child marriage, honor killing, and polygamy.  That is the world Barack Obama wants to bring to America.

Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an American convert to Islam and a sought after speaker said in a 1992 speech, "If only Muslims were politically clever they could take over the United States ad replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.  If we were untied and strong we’d elect our won Emir and give allegiance to him.  Take my word, if six to eight millions Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us.”

Most major studies estimate a worldwide Muslim population for the year 2000 at roughly 1.25 billion people; that is, about one-fifth or 20 percent of the world’s population.  In comparison, Christianity is the largest religion in the world with about 33% of the world’s population.

Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world.  According to United Nations statistics, between 1989 and 1998 the Islamic population grew by more than 100% in Europe (to about 14 million or 2 percent of the population).  At the current rate of growth it is estimated that Islam’s population by the year 2025 will be 1.9 billion (about 24 percent of the world’s population).

The growth rate of Islam in Western nations (including the US and Canada) primarily comes through: a high Muslim birth rate and immigration, not from converts. 

In 1995 there were some 4 million Muslims in France, 1.9 million in Germany, and 1.5 million in the UK, accounting for 7 percent, 2.4 percent, and 2.7 percent of the overall populations respectively.  In 1998 7 percent of babies born within the European Union were Muslim; in Brussels it was as much as 57 percent.  

In the UK, Muslims patrol their neighborhoods enforcing Sharia law.  They accost women not dressed according to their mores.  They attack people carrying alcohol.  A Muslim spokesman said, “Islam is here in London, Mr. David Cameron, Mr. Police Officer, whether you like it or not. We are in command.  The kuffars (unbelievers) can go to hell.  This is not a Christian country.  Christianity can go to hell.  The police cannot stop us.  We are coming to implement Islam immediately.  Anyone who tires to stop us, we will implement Islam upon their necks.”

This could never happen in America…could it?  In America, Muslim families have four or five children.  Soon, the U.S. will have a similar percentage of its population Muslim as England.

Both Christian and Muslim sources assert that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the United States.  The Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches 2000 gives the figure of 3,950,000 Muslims in America today.  Islamic Horizons states that there are eight to ten million Muslims in North America.  The most common figure cited is about six million.  The largest concentrations of Muslims are in California, New York, and Illinois - with an estimated 400,000 in the Chicago area.

While specific figures may be debated, what cannot be debated is the phenomenal growth of Islam.  According to United Nations statistics, the Muslim population in the United States grew by 25 percent between 1989 and 1998.  In 1990 there were only about 50 Islamic schools in America. Today the number is over 200.  Since 1990 the number of “registered Islamic centers and mosques” has tripled to “more than 2,500.

In 2003, Muhammad Faheed spoke at a Muslim students association meeting in New York.  He said, “Muslims must not recognize any government authority at all besides Allah.  We are not Americans.  We are Muslims.  The U.S. is going to attack us and deport us.  It is us vs. them.  Truth against falsehood.  It is the colonizers and masters against the oppressed and we will burn down the master’s house.  We reject the UN, reject America and reject all law and order.  Do not lobby congress because we do not recognize congress.  The only relationship you should have with America is to topple it.  Eventually there will be a Muslim in the white House.”

There is no such thing as,”Radical Islam.”  All Islam is radical for there is no mainstream sect of Islam or school of Islamic jurisprudence that does not teach that, “The Muslim community must wage war against the unbelievers and kill them wherever they overtake them.  Their refuge is Hell and wretched is their destination; Muslim should not befriend non-Muslims unless it is to deceive them to save themselves from danger.”

In 2007, As-Sabiqun, a Muslim group based in Washington, D.C. said, “We will see the Islamic State of North America no later than 2050.

Barack Obama has laid the foundation for Islam to come to America.  For those who dismiss the facts and seek to believe otherwise based on their emotions, the result will be that soon they will be living under Sharia law.  

Far-fetched, extreme?  It is already happening in London and the U.S. is only a generation behind.  While Westerns think in short time frames, Islam has been around for 1200 years.  To wait fifty or even one hundred more years is, for them, a small matter.
Add a comment...


First, no health care system in the world can afford to care for a population where 80% of the people are overweight and 50% are obese.  Diabetes, heart disease, cancer, all caused by or exacerbated by weight.  Health care costs this country in 2014 was 3.8 trillion dollars, projected to go to four billion in 2015.

The answer is not less tests or standardized costs.  The answer is healthier people.  The only way that can be accomplished is through a food tax.  And here is why…

Since 1950 the amount of nutritional information available to the public has roughly doubled every seven years.  During that same period (1950-2010), obesity rose by 500%.  In that light, one might conclude that there is a direct correlation between knowledge of obesity and obesity itself!  Apparently, the amount of information available hasn’t helped people understand or control anything.

The point is, people aren’t foolish.  They know that a salad is better for them than a pizza; that grilled chicken is better than a smothered burrito; that tofu is better than a cheeseburger; that fresh fruits and vegetables are better than candy bars and French fries.  People are swimming in information.  We’ve become anesthetized by information overload.  More information has not lead to enlightened behavior, less craving for food, or improved health.

There was far less obesity just a century ago.  In the early 1900s only 1 in 150 people were obese.  In the 1950’s less than 10% of the population was classified as such.  

Statistics may tell us that we are, in fact, eating more, but they have never told us why we are doing so.  Nor do they tell us why we ate roughly the same amount of calories for hundreds of years, but then in the last fifty years we suddenly began consuming 20% more calories than previously.  

Some say our diets have changed, that we are consuming more fats.  Yet, during the past fifty years, while obesity rates have skyrocketed, the consumption of saturated fats rose only 7%.  And, according to The U.S. Department of Agriculture, total fats in our diet have fallen from 40% in 1990 to roughly 34% today.

Others say that it is the way we eat.  The government is now sponsoring a revamping of the food pyramid.  It is now called the Healthy Eating Pyramid.  This is the third overhaul of the pyramid in the past thirty years.  Yet, while the pyramid continues to be revised, obesity rates in the United States have continued to soar.  This food pyramid, as the ones before it, has been touted as the answer to the obesity epidemic.  Yet it will fail as did its predecessors, because it is flawed, not simply by its factuality, but by its lack of perspective.  

The current obesity epidemic began in the 1950s:

• The completion of an interstate highway system that spawned suburbia, separating neighbors with lawns and garages and forty-foot wide streets.  
• The evolution of inexpensive air travel, along with jobs spreading far beyond the city limits, that has influenced people’s decision and ability to move more frequently, making long-lasting relationship as fleeting as the next job offer or flight out of town.
• A changing economic climate that requires two working parents, leaving children to fend for themselves and succumb to the influences of the media, malls, and mass marketers.
• Technology that begat computers, faxes, e-mails, and video-conferencing, which have distanced workers and friends and have made face-to-face communication more rare.
• A rapid-paced culture, with twenty percent less free time than in the 1960’s, that has generated the need for fast food establishments and, along with them, an ever increasing proliferation of fats, processed foods, and sugar in our diet.
• A lack of participation in and appreciation for the role of exercise in our evolution.
• Separation from nature due to ever expanding cities.
• Television, which has stolen the motivation to pursue goals, engage in new pursuits, and, with forty-four percent of commercials advertising snack foods, entices viewers to eat incessantly.  
• Fluoridation of the water supply (1957)

Up until 1950, people ate only enough to meet their caloric requirements.  Individuals today eat for a very different reason: to gain a euphoric feeling through the chemicals released in the body by the foods we eat: Endorphins.  

Many of the ways we used to gain satisfaction have been engineered out of society, or only available to those who make a conscious effort.  So how do we overcome these changes and regain control of our diet and our lives

One of the most important attributes of endorphins is their capacity to promote a sense of well-being.  In fact, some endorphins are known to be hundreds of times stronger than opiates like morphine and heroin!  

Enkephalins (short-lived endorphins triggered by the consumption of fat and sugary foods) stimulate the hypothalamus (the part of the brain that controls appetite) to continue eating.  This system of reward overrides the signals from the stomach and intestines that would normally tell the brain to shut down the eating process.

In 1993, an experiment was conducted to determine the power of endorphins.  Scientists inserted electrodes into the brains of rats.  The rats ran a maze, after which they could either pull a lever, which would through the electrodes, trigger the release of endorphins, or they 
could pull a lever that provided nutritious food, or a lever that provided access to sex.  The results were that the rats chose endorphins, neglecting food, which, in some cases, resulted in death.  And each day we humans run our own maze, fueled predominately by food, rewarded by endorphins and the euphoric feelings they provide.

There are five behaviors that trigger endorphin release.  These are: 

1 - Eating
2 - Exercise
3 – Shared Compassion, Love, Camaraderie 
4 - Adaptation To New Situations 
5 - Interaction With Enriched Environments

First, there are five scientifically proven ways to stimulate endorphin release.  Those have just been outlined and will be substantiated later in this book by independent research.  Second, we know from archeological records that our ancestors engaged in these five activities every single day of their lives.  

1) They constantly moved to new environments, following the herds of animals and good weather.  
2) They had to learn new behaviors to form alliances with other tribes.  
3) Their daily activities burned as many calories as they consumed.  
4) They shared love, supported one-another, and worked together in feeding, 
            sheltering, and protecting one-another.
5) They ate modest amounts of endorphin-releasing foods

The problem for so many people today, is not simply food, or overeating.  Rather, it is a lack of appreciation for, and participation in, activities that have been the impetus for human health, satisfaction, and advancement for millions of years.  

As we evolved, we took with us our endorphin set point, but left behind the inter-connectedness, extended family, daily adventure, interaction with nature and enriched environments, and regular physical activity.  We went from diversity and socialization to specialization and separation.  Today, for those dependent solely upon food for this euphoric feeling, the need for endorphin release begins anew not only each day, but with each meal.  After all, the lifespan of enkephalins (short-lived endorphins triggered by the foods we eat) is measured in only hours or minutes, depending on our food selection. 

If one chooses to reach that set point solely through eating, all one needs to do is continually ingest large amounts of endorphin-releasing foods.  We can vividly see the results of relying on food as our sole source of endorphins.  We are a country where more three-quarters of us are overweight.

Some say that we are genetically programmed to take advantage of every opportunity to eat because did not know where or when our next meal would come.  That is patently false.  Paleolithic man spent an average of 3 hours a day hunting, making shelter, and eating.  The rest of their time was spent interacting with each other or other tribes, traveling to new areas, etc.  Had we been constantly starving, man would have spent all waking hours eating, like Panda bear on bamboo stalks.

In 1957, the government began fluoridating the water supply to aid in tooth decay and gum disease.  But no one informed them that fluoridation affects the thyroid, slowing the metabolism.  Now, for a person to lose weight is almost impossible.  95% of people who go on a diet wind up weighing more at the end of the program.

We would like to think that, given the proper information, people will make the correct decisions.  That has been proven false in almost every aspect of consumerism.  Buying houses too expensive, cars too big, the wrong foods, drugs (both illegal and legal), etc.

There is only one program that will influence people’s eating habits: money.  A food tax.  

The ability to self-regulate is beyond all but the few strongest-willed individuals.  Our society has become totally focused on immediate gratification.  To have an impact, policy must, of necessity, take hold from where people’s values and concerns are centered, not from where we hope they would have evolved to.  In a materially dominated nation, costs rule the decision-making process and govern the attention of those who consume and produce.

The attempt to satiate the body and mind by the end result, rather than the 
process, is doomed to fail.  There isn’t enough food available, in quantity or quality to fill that impossible chasm.  As long as individuals focus on personal gain at the expense of self and others, diseases of the corporeal and cerebral will advance.  Yet the delusion goes on, and with it the demise of the physical and mental health of those in the industrialized nations.

Food Tax

By comparing any food or beverage to present accepted standards, ratings for all ingested products can be compiled.  Following are the averages of the factors deemed essential in such analysis - calories, cholesterol, salt, sugar, fat (saturated and unsaturated), based on the United States Department of Agriculture’s food guidance system and supported by the Department of Health and Human Services.  Note that these suggested guidelines are for the maintenance of minimum, not optimum, health.

The National Academy of Sciences recommends the consumption of 2,200 
calories* for the average American.  The following parameters apply:

1) Fat - 30% of total calories = 73 grams of fat per day
2) Saturated fat - 10% of total calories = 24 grams of saturated fat per day
3) Cholesterol ** - 300 mg. per day
4) Sugar - 48 grams of added sugar per day***
5) Salt - 2,400 mg. per day

*This figure can be modified for active individuals - pregnant women or children - without changing the percentages of any component. 
**If a food does not have cholesterol or fat as a natural part of its make-up, that category is not counted.
***Only added sugars are considered, not those naturally occurring.

Examples Of High And Low Rated Foods From Each Category

Highest Lowest

Vegetables Spinach Cream of mushroom soup
41.40 cal. 24.96 cal.
.468 grms of fat 1.747 grms of fat
.076 grms sat fat .587 grms sat fat
126 mg of salt 204.6 mg of salt
0 grms of sgr 1.5 grms of sgr
0 mg of chol 2.266 mg of chol

78% of avg.; 22% price reduc. 345% of avg.; 245% 
                                                                     price increase

Fruits Cantaloupe Jelly Donut

392.0 cal 289 cal
1.36 grms of fat 15.9 grms of fat
0 grms sat fat 4.050 grms sat fat
249.0 mg of salt 249.0 mg of salt
0 grms of sgr 21 grms of sgr
0 mg of chol 22.0 mg of chol

13.7% of avg.; 43% price reduc. 153% of avg.; 53% price

Grains Shredded wheat Chocolate chip cookies

83.0 cal 334 cal
.3 grms of fat 14.9 grms of fat
.0 grms sat fat 4.97 grms sat fat
.472 mg of salt 285.0 mg of salt
.094 grms of sgr 17.80 grms of sgr
0 mg of chol 8.52 mg of chol
3.4% of avg; 96.6% price reduc. 122% of avg; 22% price

Legumes Bean Sprouts Jack-in-the-box Taco

7.103 cal 183.0 cal
.057 grms of fat 11.0 grms of fat
.013 grms sat fat 5.0 grms sat fat
3.977 mg of salt 276.0 mg of salt
.2 grms of sgr 1.6 grms of sgr
0 mg of chol 32.0 mg of chol

56% of avg.; 44% price reduc. 148% of avg.; 48%                                                                           price increase

Dairy Egg Beaters School lunch scrambled eggs
25.0 cal 87.0 cal
0 grms of fat 6.0 grms of fat
0 grms sat fat 0 grms sat fat
100.0 mg of salt 151.0 mg of salt
.2 grms of sgr 1.2 grms of sgr
0 mg of chol 277.0 mg of chol
83% of avg; 17% price reduc. 560% of avg; 460% price

Meat/poultry/Fish Tuna canned in water Bologna
32.94 cal 88.0 cal
.233 grms of fat 8.1 grms of fat
.066 grms sat fat 3.42 grms sat fat
95.53 mg of salt 278.0 mg of salt
0 grms of sgr 0 grms of sgr
8.315 mg of chol 16.0 mg of chol

     97.85 of avg; 2.15% price reduc. 211% of avg; 111% price

Example #1 - An average food

Based on U.S.D.A. standards an average food with 10% the daily totals would contain the following:

1/10 of a day’s requirement of 2,200 calories = 220 calories
1/10 of the recommended 73 grams of total fat = 7.3 grams of fat
1/10 of the recommended 24 grams of saturated fat = 2.4 grams of saturated fat.
1/10 the recommended 2,400 milligrams of salt = 240 milligrams of salt 
1/10 the recommended 48 grams of added sugar = 4.8 grams of added sugar
1/10 the recommended 300 mg. of cholesterol = 30 mg. of cholesterol

Example #2 -  Swanson’s Mexican Frozen Dinner:

A food containing 590 calories has 27% of the daily average total recommended calories (590 / 2200).  Therefore, all its ingredients should possess 27% of the recommended daily allowance

This food contains 1865 mgs. of salt.  27% of the daily total of 2400 mgs. is 648 mgs. of salt (.27 X 2400).)  Therefore, this food has 288% of normal (1865 / 648).

This food contains 43.90 mgs. of cholesterol.  27% of the daily total of 300 mg. per
day is 81 mgs. of cholesterol (.27 X 300).  Therefore this food has 54% of normal
(43.9 / 81).

This food contains 4.6 gms of added sugar.  27% of the daily total of 48 grms = 12.96 grms of added sugar.  Therefore this food has 35% of normal (4.6 / 12.96).

This food has 29 grms of fat.  27% of the daily total of 73 grms = 19.71 grms of fat.  Therefore this food has 147% of normal (29 / 19.71).

This food has 8.88 grams of saturated fat.  27% of the daily total of 24 grms = 6.48 grms of saturated fat.  Therefore this food has 137% of normal (8.88 / 6.48).

The final configuration gives us a food containing::

288% of recommended of salt
 54% of recommended cholesterol
147% of recommended fat
137% of saturated fat
 35% of recommended sugar

661% total divided by 5 factors = 133% of recommended average.  This food would now have an additional tax of 33% added to its previous cost.

Example #3 - Beef frankfurter:

A food containing 183 calories has 8% of the daily average total recommended calories (183 / 2200).  Therefore, all its ingredients should possess 8% of the recommended daily allowance

This food contains 639 mgs. of salt.  8% of the daily total of 2400 mgs. is 192 mgs. of salt (.08 X 2400).)  Therefore, this food has 333% of normal (639 / 192).

This food contains 29 mgs. of cholesterol.  8% of the daily total of 300 mg. per
day is 24 mgs. of cholesterol (.08 X 300).  Therefore this food has 121% of normal 
(29 / 24).

This food contains 1.14 grms of added sugar.  8% of the daily total of 48 grms. = 3.84 grms of added sugar.  Therefore this food has 30% of normal (1.14 / 3.84).
This food has 16.6 grms of fat.  8% of the daily total of 73 grms = 5.84 grms of fat.  Therefore this food has 284% of normal (29 / 19.71).

This food has 6.13 grms of saturated fat.  8% of the daily total of 24 grms = 1.92 grms of saturated fat.  Therefore this food has 319% of normal (6.13 / 1.92).

The final configuration gives us a food containing:

333% of recommended of salt
121% of recommended cholesterol
284% of recommended fat
319% of saturated fat
 30% of recommended sugar

     1087% total divided by 5 factors = 217.4% of recommended average.  This food would now have an additional tax of 117.4% added to its previous cost.

Example #4 - Snicker’s Candy Bar 

A food containing 270 calories has 12.3% of the daily average total recommended calories (270 / 2200).  Therefore, all its ingredients should possess 12.3% of the 
recommended daily allowance of essential ingredients.

This food contains 145 mgs. of salt.  12.3% of the daily total of 2400 mgs. is 295.2 mgs. of salt (.123 X 2400).  Therefore, this food has 49% of normal (145 / 295.2).

This food contains 9.12 mgs. of cholesterol.  12.3% of the daily total of 300 mgs. is 36.9 mgs. of chol (.123 X 300).  Therefore, this food has 24.7% of normal (9.12 / 36.9).

This food contains 27.8 grams of added sugar.   12.3% of the daily total of 48 grms. = 5.9 grms of added sugar.  Therefore this food has 471% of normal 
(27.80 / 5.9).

This food has 13 grms of fat.  12.3% of the daily total of 73 grms = 9.98 grms of fat.  Therefore this food has 130% of normal (13 / 9.98).

This food has 4.73 grams of saturated fat.  12.3% of the daily total of 24 grms = 2.95 grms of saturated fat.  Therefore this food has 160% of normal (4.73 / 2.95).

The final configuration gives us a food containing:

 49% of recommended of salt
24.7% of recommended cholesterol
130% of recommended fat
160% of saturated fat
471% of recommended sugar

834% total divided by 5 factors = 167% of recommended average.  This food would now have an additional tax of 67% added to its previous cost.

Programs supported by the food tax

Either by issuing an investment credit to companies that use beneficial products and/or taxing companies that use detrimental products, or taxing consumers at the point of purchase, a fund can be established which would endow such programs.  

The monies collected, based on factual, consistent parameters would be used in a three phased approach.  One, counter the messages of the advertisers of junk food, nutrient-empty products and proven health hazards with scientific studies from 
unbiased, non-advertiser-affiliated laboratories.  Two, clearly delineate the cost of 
choosing based on emotional, personal reasons.  Three, pay for the care and cure of persons suffering from genetic or environmental factors.
Add a comment...


Let’s take the Noble Peace from Barack Obama and give it to Vladimir Putin.  Obama was given the prize for two reasons, one …he was not George Bush.  Two, he promised to be the most transparent administration ever.  Instead he has sequestered more documents than any president in history, gone after more whistle blowers than all other president combined, and carried George Bush’s spying programs to new, airy heights even Bush and Cheney would be jealous of.

Further he lied about everything he said in his election speeches.  He did not stop torture; he did no close Gitmo, 

He fomented revolutions and coups de etads KNOWING that the groups coming to power were all (Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Egypt) affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood or al-Qaeda, Jihadists, Islamists, terrorists.

Vladimir Putin was lied to by the America.  The agreement between George Bush Sr., representing America, and Michael Gorbachev was that if Gorbochov allowed the wall to come down, the West (America and NATO) would not expand eastward, would not arm the newly independent countries, would not push the East European countries once under Soviet control to join the EU.  Every single president since Bush Sr. has broken every promise ever made and pushed Putin to the edge.

Washington made such a promise in exchange for the Soviet troop withdrawal from East Germany -- and then betrayed that promise as NATO added 12 eastern European countries in three subsequent rounds of enlargement.  These promises were made by Western leaders to Mikhail Gorbachev after the unification of Germany -- most notably that they would not expand NATO eastward.” Indeed, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggressive actions in Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014 were fueled in part by his ongoing resentment about what he sees as the West’s broken pact over NATO expansion

Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko practices ethnic cleansing.  To him, Russians are sub-human, vermin to be exterminated.  Left to his own devices, he would have killed or driven out of the country every single Russian.  Vladimir Putin exhibited great restraint in only using the minimum of force necessary to avoid a slaughter.  He could have rolled through Ukraine and take back the country.  He allowed thousands of his own people to die rather than act too hastily or swiftly.

If you read “1984” by Orwell, you will see the U.S. using the EXACT same policy. “Constantly invent an enemy to keep the people distracted from the fact that everything is being taken from them.

Let me add that I am not a Republican or Democrat.  I am a Libertarian.  I believe in the Constitution and Democracy, neither of which is being adhered to.

Jeffry Weiss, 12/14/2014
Add a comment...

Dear friends:

My books are fiction based on fact. I start out with current realities in the world but quickly segue to circumstances that encompass a world of sadist warlords, corrupt politicians, genocides Code 6 assignments, Jihadists, and environmental catastrophes.

My stories do more than entertain, they educate, inspire. From the death camps in North Korea, to the spying on Americans, to the risk of computer hacking turning into a kinetic war, to the slow growth of fascism in America, to the U.S. government and banks support of the drug cartels, Paul Decker assignments take him all over the world following the trail of the worst men, the most evil organizations, the worst countries.

This is a link to my web site ( where you can read all my articles for free and comment on them. There is also a link to jump to Amazon to buy the e-books (only $2.99) or the paperback (prices vary).

If my books or articles inspire you, touch your heart or stimulate your mind, please share the experience with others.


Jeffry Weiss
Add a comment...
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded