Jacob Scott commented on a post on Blogger.
Is it really fair to say that the Nature paper on the dynamics of CML changed the way we treat it? It certainly was an advance in our understanding, but I don't think that it changed our clinical behaviour. I agree entirely that our role in math oncology must needs be incremental, and therefore we'll be hard pressed to find 'A PAPER' that changes everything in one fell swoop.  The best we could hope for, I think, is a paper that opens the avenue to the change by introducing a new viewpoint, or pointing out an area of missing data...

Either way, there's work to do!
Shared publiclyView activity