Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Blake Hall
198 followers -
Moving forward with science
Moving forward with science

198 followers
About
Posts

Post has shared content
Uber vs. the Law (My Money's on Uber)

I love Uber, the ridesharing app that connects people who need rides with drivers.

Instead of my normal $35 taxi ride to LAX, an UberX car takes me for about $11.

The service is active in 108 US cities and 45 countries worldwide.

Five years ago, it didn't exist. Today, it's valued at over $18 billion.

It truly is an Exponential Organization.

Uber is one of a new generation of dematerializing, demonetizing and democratizing technologies that's disrupting the status quo.

I talk about these technologies and their implications with my Abundance 360 mastermind group in January (apply here, if interested).

Simply put, Uber is a product adored by passengers and Uber drivers alike.

It uses technology to dramatically improve a broken system. It solves a pain point.

As a result, hordes have left the traditional taxis and rental car options.

Understandably, these incumbents aren't happy, and where do they turn?

Regulation.

Uber's Long, Legal Battle

I recently spent a week with Uber CEO Travis Kalanick in Sicily at Google Camp.

I'd heard mention of some of the legislative challenges that Uber was facing globally, but I wasn't really aware of the scope or scale of what was happening.

Check out this global resistance:

Germany: officials just slapped a nationwide ban on Uber – because the drivers don't have correct permits. Drivers will face fines of up to $323,700 per trip if Uber violates this temporary injunction.
Spain: Hundreds of taxi drivers went on strike in June, protesting the unregulated private service that was taking their business.
India: "According to the Economic Times, three Uber competitors -- Meru Cabs, Easy Cab, and Mega Cab -- have written to the Reserve Bank of India, complaining that Uber is violating foreign-exchange laws."
Brazil: Uber might face legal problems if the government of Sao Paulo pushes for the suspension of its service. For example, a few weeks ago "three cars were found providing services through Uber in Sao Paulo and the drivers had to pay fines of $900 on average."
Vancouver: The city attorney claims that the service is illegal: "Though the meter UberX uses does not look like a traditional taxi meter that measures time and distance as the ride progresses, it still fits within the definition of (a) taxi meter [under city code]."
United States: The taxi lobbies are putting enormous pressure on local governments to block Uber in their cities. In Milwaukee, five taxi groups are "suing the city of Milwaukee, hoping to block an ordinance that provides a path to legalization for mobile ride-booking apps." In California, New York and DC, Uber has faced numerous cease-and-desist orders.

And yet

Regulation, the Protection of Last Resort

Laws typically favor the incumbent solutions that manifested them in the first place.

But when an industry turns to protectionist regulations to keep a more cost-effective solution out of the market, you know it's in a death spiral.

Take the horse versus the automobiles, for example.

Many hated cars in the early 1900s because, well, they scared horses.

In fact, amazingly, at the turn of the century, a law in Pennsylvania stated:

"Any motorist who sights a team of horses coming toward him must pull well off the road, cover his car with a blanket or canvas that blends with the countryside, and let the horses pass. If the horses appear skittish, the motorist must take his car apart, piece by piece, and hide it under the nearest bushes."

In general, the government's major role is stabilization.

But many times when a product is so much better say 10x or more the incumbent will eventually lose. They must adapt or go extinct. Regulation can only stay the change for a short time.

And during this time of accelerating change, where the only constant is change, we will be seeing a lot of 10x improvements challenging the norm.

Look at Airbnb, Pandora, iTunes, Tesla, Craigslist. The list goes on and on.

Technologies that leverage the 6 D's will WIN

In my mind, the companies and products that solve problems most effectively (and most cheaply) will win.

Many of these are the products that follow the 6 D's of exponential change. To demonstrate what this means, for those not part of Abundance 360, let's look at how Uber fits into this model:

Digitized: Uber digitized the taxi-calling experience, the payments process, the taxi-navigating process, the fare splitting process, and more.
Deceptive to Disruptive: In my mind, Uber, despite being an $18 billion company, is still in its deceptive growth stage. Just wait until we get into automated vehicles and self-driving cars. Guess who will be perfectly positioned to take over that market?
Dematerialized: Uber dematerialized a number of things, including the need for taxi fleets. In some cases, it dematerialized owning a car for many who elect to "Uber" everywhere instead.
Demonetized: Uber eliminated the annoying fees and taxes that taxis require, as well as taking "tipping" out of the picture.
Democratized: UberX is cheap and available to anyone with a smartphone (and the service in the area). It is democratizing transportation.
Despite their many legal challenges, Uber continues to drive and thrive.

They are growing explosively, and the company is changing the game.

And frankly, knowing Travis' vision for Uber, we haven't seen anything yet.

This is an important debate

I acknowledge the debate about technology vs. policy is an important one.

Technology can be a double-edged sword.

I want to talk with you about the implications these technologies have on jobs, on wages, on livelihoods. To have these debates together.

And it seems Uber does too.

They just hired David Plouffe, one of U.S. President Barack Obama's key election advisers, to take charge of policy and strategy.

If you want to join me in this discussion, and learn where other technologies will become disruptive over the next few years, I've put together a mastermind of CEOs, entrepreneurs, and executives called Abundance 360. Apply here.

Each week, I write a blog on exciting emerging technologies and trends. Sign up at PeterDiamandis.com to ensure you don't miss them.
Add a comment...

I take solace knowing that even if Western civilization collapses in a heap of anti-technological/scientific ludditism, they'll still be Asia to take over the reins. And knowing China, probably take over the world.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Photo
Add a comment...

[I removed the image from this post, hopefully it is in compliance with all rules now]

Sometimes, it's the little things that make your hope start to slip away. Earlier today I did a search for "chewing gum health", and Mercola (a well-known doctor of quackopathic medicine) showed up #1 on Google, while the Mayo Clinic's factual write-up was near the bottom of the page.

Democracy at work?

How are we going to collectively evolve as a species if so much of the population can't tell the simplest facts from fiction? Become tyrannical and force the population to become more intelligent? Do nothing and hope it all works out? After all, IQ is still going up--at least overall.

I suspect as economic inequality grows so does intellectual inequality, and society's smartest and richest will increasingly find themselves living in a different world than her poorest and dumbest. Which could cause problems (or rather, much larger ones than it already is).

Would appreciate your thoughts.

Post has attachment
Sometimes, it's the little things that make your hope start to slip away. Earlier today I did a search for "chewing gum health", and Mercola (a well-known doctor of quackopathic medicine) showed up #1 on Google, while the Mayo Clinic's factual write-up was near the bottom of the page.

Democracy at work?

How are we going to collectively evolve as a species if so much of the population can't tell the simplest facts from fiction? Become tyrannical and force the population to become more intelligent? Do nothing and hope it all works out? After all, IQ is still going up--at least overall.

I suspect as economic inequality grows so does intellectual inequality, and society's smartest and richest will increasingly find themselves living in a different world than her poorest and dumbest. Which could cause problems (or rather, much larger ones than it already is)
Photo

Post has attachment
This is an accurate representation of the real world. And all the more funny for it.

It's interesting how few legitimately smart people acknowledge being smart. In the meantime, every blue-collar worker considers herself a demigod
Photo

Hey all,

I was wondering If anyone might know why there are so few transhumanism/singularity/futurist communities on G+? (and with so few members.}  I know it's a smaller platform, but it also has a more tech savvy and higher educated viewer base on average.

Any idea why this might be?

Hey all,

I was wondering If anyone might know why there are so few transhumanism/singularity/futurist communities on G+? (and with so few members.}  I know it's a smaller platform, but it also has a more tech savvy and higher educated viewer base on average.

Any idea why this might be?

Post has attachment
Technophobic cliches saturate popular culture. This has been the case for as long as there has been technology. But as more of the older generations die off and the newer rise to power, the dynamic changes. Unfortunately, centuries of anti-tech writings and backwards cultural traditions may be difficult to expunge.

For those lacking humor sensors, article below is comedy.

Post has attachment
Ahh, Men's Rights Activists--few groups lend themselves to mockery as these MANLY MALE MEN do.
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded