Below essay is a very introspective piece!
"......the concept of being “woke,” that thorny state of higher consciousness,...is a state of being that never allows you to get fully comfortable or complacent. ... once you are woke, you can never unlearn this knowledge. It may be harder to find moments of joy, but these moments are not permanently unattainable....There is a sense of incomparable freedom in the decision to put faith in your autonomy. To say: I will not lie down in the darkness of defeat.
To be woke means that the pursuit of knowledge takes precedent over accepting popular opinion. To be woke also means that ego should never sway your awareness. To be woke is a journey without a final resting place. To be woke means that not everyone will understand you...."
..." In an election year where we are finally beginning to discuss the havoc wreaked by deregulation, wage inequality, job insecurity, and growing income volatility, it is inexcusable for politicians to claim that we would not need to invest in living-wage jobs, affordable education, and a stronger social safety net if only everyone would marry. Fewer than 6 percent of children in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden and just 7 to 9 percent of children in Austria and the Netherlands are poor. Yet all these countries have higher birthrates to unmarried women than the United States, where child poverty is over 20 percent."
The Christian churches (Catholic, Mainline Protestants, Fundamentalists or Pentecostals) since the 1980s rise of Ronald Reagan with the latter's main ally, i.e. the so-called "MORAL MAJORITY;" withdrew from their earlier concern for "the other" issue of social justice and almost completely turned themselves inwards to simplistic, individualistic pursuit of "holiness or religiosity" for "personal salvation." Throw out a token bit of charity, here and there if you feel like it.
So all these essentially churchy social sects, cults and clubs or "community" of the "saved"
Individual piety/religiosity and self-centered greed seem to pair together, when I look at these people.
Just Praise the Lord/Jesus. That's their main interpretation of Christianity. As far as I know or learned in my youth, that's only half of the two most important love messages of JC.
Have a good Sunday!
Firstly, I believe, feel and think that any priest/pastor, etc. has the right to speak out against politicians. My understanding and interpretation of the Constitutional Article II Section 6 and Article III Section 5 on the "separation of church and state," which we native Filipinos essentially copied from the American Constitution, do not prohibit such. They specifically prohibit the State, i.e. government, from declaring/establishing one as official religion.
Having said that and given our homeland realities where the Roman Catholic Church/Christian religion (RCC) is dominant. I find that, for the most period of our Filipino history then and now, this religious institution was/is a major obstacle in the struggle for the "common good."
This election time as in the past, the RCC hierarchy has "discerned" (its favorite term), spoken for, preached its meek faithful followers towards and supported candidates whom it perceives as religious, pious, close to the RCC hierarchy, etc.
Conversely, the RCC spoke against those candidates who it considers "disrespectful" of the Pope, speaking "bad words," making "dirty" jokes; for planned parenthood, sexually immoral, etc. The RCC, it seems to me, is "too sex-oriented." Get my drift? I will not expound here as I have already written some blog postings re RCC or Christian religion as practiced in our homeland.
And look at what kind of governance/results we native Filipinos, who like sheeps, had after voting per RCC recommendations. The two RCC-supported presidential candidates in recent decades (Cora Aquino and Gloria Arroyo). These two supposedly religious, prayerful, church-going, nun-nurtured/educated women from the expensive, elitist Catholic schools did not really improve the socioeconomic lot of our native majority (except themselves, their family clan and ilks). Instead their rule as presidents, 6 and 9 years respectively, further paved the "road to perdition" for our fellow native Filipinos. I am not saying that our other presidents then and now are much better (that's another topic). Ad nauseam.
The RCC (with few exceptions) and its competitor spin-offs of disillusioned Catholic faithful, who in turn joined the colonist US-export: mainline Protestantism and belatedly the latter's more fundamentalist wing which mimics the American Holiness Pentecostal Movement, both actively withdrew from social concerns (the "common good") that matter; and in lieu promoted their spirituality to be concentrated back to the inward, meditative-self; whereby unknowingly imitating the monks and convent nuns; and outwardly displaying "holier-than-thou" show of piety, religiosity, etc. Attend to and save oneself, forget the social justice issues; that latter is not the ticket to heavenly paradise.
Knowing the Protestants history and their movement's foundational doctrines, I do not expect the mainline Protestants and their Pentecostal faithful to pursue anything beyond "personal salvation," as their fundamental beliefs system dictates that "good works" are not necessary for salvation; just be "born again," password Jesus.
Makes me think why even pray when being "born again" saves one for eternal bliss per their interpretation of the Jesus narrative (New Testament) and some picked story lines from the Hebrew Testament of an apparently insecure, praise-hungry, angry, and vengeful God.
Tough luck for those who never heard of JC, that is, pagans and their descendants; or those who do not accept the story. For these infidels, Dante's Eternal Hell fire and the Devil/Satan/Lucifer and those thinkers who preceded these non-followers regardless of reasons await them. Contrast to RCC belief that "good works" can help the believers' salvation.
A cafeteria Christianity combo narrative produces a Religion of Fear. Be like children to the authoritarian God of the Old/Hebrew Testament and the Good News of JC's loving sacrifice from the New Testament. Amid this confusing combo, Choose one.
Essentially paramount to them all and the RCC charismatic variety is the pursuit of "personal salvation" for the supposed afterlife heavenly gates, and not actively attending to and participating in the present here-and-now struggles for "social justice." For today's RCC, the "old" social justice-directed, such as village self-help movement, Basic Christian Communities/BCC organization were muzzled as they were characterized by ruling elites as “communist” or “leftist” because they, like Marxist movements, seek to ameliorate the suffering of the poor. The RCC concurred, saw it as too radical and changed it to a more hierarchy-controllable Basic Ecumenical Communities/BEC.
By the way, what was that love-talk from Jesus (love of neighbor, and God, right ? per JC) I guess we'll just knell and pray, and let the heavenly angels do the needed work for attaining the "common good." Lip service is good enough. Praying is easy, it can be done anywhere; even while having a party; but not struggle or stand with the poor, rowdy, smelly native majority for their tiny place under the sun.
Without going any further, I would say that if the RCC in our homeland speaks out, it should be ready to hear those who speak against them. It's supposedly a democracy now, not the friars' time to lord over as in the 16th to early 20th century. But of course, our RCC believes, pontificates and acts as if it is still in that era, anachronistic frame of mind.
- Bert M Drona
Some of my postings in my blog:THE FILIPINO MIND
- OUR RELIGION IN SOCIETY: (Belief Systems)
- Our Filipino Kind of Religion & Use at Desperate Times
- Our Filipino Christianity and Our God-concept
- When Our Religion Becomes Evil
- Split-level Christianity, "Theory versus Practice," Part 1 of 2
- Split-level Christianity, "Theory versus Practice,"Part 2 of 2
- Our Filipino Norm of Morality
Below photo of book cover:
ALTAR OF SECRETS by Aries Rufo. First kind of book by fellow Filipino that critiqued the RCC. Pretty informative.
It's election time in our homeland and the common man feels empowered as he can vote, which makes him believe he lives in a democracy, that is, election=democracy. It makes us
While those of us, the arrogant, so-called educated native minority, blame these "mobs," (remember Greek word "demos" means recisely that, the common people;or mob to some Founding Fathers or elite in general.) our fellow native, impoverished majority for briefly enjoying the show and accepting the freebies in exchange for votes.
Anyway, there is an implicit acceptance that the winner-candidates will more than recoup their "investment" from the "money tree/"cash cow:" (the government coffers). And we all thereafter either moan, groan or just laugh about it. As to those who gave opinions, they mostly forget all about them, do no follow-ups; as they are all "ningas-kugons." As always, Pray and Praise the Lord to fix our problems And all continue their blessed, "holier than thou" merry ways.
"As to the source of leadership, we native (Malay/indio) Filipinos still look up and limit ourselves to the same socioeconomic-political elite, the same prominent dynasties, many of whom were of the collaborationist and mendicant variety. There is potentially good leadership, maybe still unknown, OUTSIDE the selfish, morally bankrupt and oftentimes subservient elite. When we have done away with our massive ignorance, we native Filipinos can surely find and actively ensure that only individuals
– Bert M Drona
WHERE DO OUR TAXES GO?
Here on FB and other social media/press I see a lot of exchanges and usually complaints that our taxes are being wasted on "social welfare" of bums and "welfare queens," as Reagan used to describe them --same tunes we always hear from Republicans, political conservatives, neoconservatives, military servicemen,etc. I think most of them are either naive, ignorant or misinformed about our country's budget (federal). I wish they would put some honest effort on researching the easily available facts; and critical thinking would show them how our federal budget is sliced. These can be done even while drinking beer.
Take note that our/U.S. military expenditures are roughly the size of the next nine largest military budgets around the world, combined.
In 2015, the US' estimated military budget was expected to be $601 billion, down from $610 billion spent in 2014. However, even with the budgetary drawdown, the US still far outspends the next six highest spending nations.
All the while, our infrastructures (bridges, roads, rails), healthcare, public schools and other essential public/social services have gone to the dogs.
All in the name of the nebulous "national security" aka "national defense" and our PERMANENT WAR MENTALITY since WW2: from "fighting communism," then to "war on drugs", and implementing "regime changes" in the name of "fighting terrorism" now. As much decorated, including highly decorated and Medal of Honor recipient US Marines/General Smedley Butler wrote [alluding to the fact that our country has been seeking fights beyond its borders ever since i-
"The Philippines makes a decent representative example of the US' first official exercise in colonial imperialism and formal empire [*], also referred to as "civilizational imperialism" - a project we're presently repeating.
"Lest this seem to be the bellicose pipe-dream of some dyspeptic desk soldier, let us remember that the military deal of our country has never been defensive warfare. Since the Revolution, only the United Kingdom has beaten our record for square miles of territory acquired by military conquest. Our exploits against the American Indian, against the Filipinos, the Mexicans, and against Spain are on a par with the campaigns of Genghis Khan, the Japanese in Manchuria and the African attack of Mussolini.
NO COUNTRY has ever declared war on us before we first obliged them with that gesture. Our whole history shows we have NEVER fought a defensive war. And at the rate our armed forces are being implemented at present, the odds are against our fighting one in the near future." - -- Major General Smedley D. Butler, America's Armed Forces: 'In Time of Peace', 1935. 1898-1914: The Phillipines.
The late Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces (WW2) and as two-terms U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower in his valedictory address warned about the nascent military-industrial complex, which today has become a major beneficiary of our annual budgeting outlays.
Let us also note that given our huge war machines, our manufacturing industries and national employment have become dependent on having (promotingt!!) constant or permanent war, as foreseen/mentioned above.
The horses are out of the gate on a great debate of the FY 2016 U.S. budget: in a world with the Afghanistan war winding down, but with renewed concerns about terrorism and the threat of ISIS, how much does America need to spend to stay safe?
So far, President Obama, the House and Senate have all lined up with a whopping request for Pentagon and related spending of $612 to $613 billion. The original Senate Budget Committee plan would have spent less at $574 billion on the Pentagon and related spending in 2016, but the bill finally passed by Senators nearly matched the $613 billion proposed by the House.
To put that in context, $613 billion would put Pentagon and related spending at about the level it was in 2004, when the U.S. spent $90 billion on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It would also mean higher spending than at any point during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. And while these budgets are sometimes light on details, in the president’s version only about $5 billion of the total would be devoted to fighting ISIS.
So if it’s not for fighting ISIS, where would that funding go?
Some items that the Pentagon has priced higher than the battle against ISIS include: the $11 billion the Pentagon has requested for development of its over-budget, never-used F-35 jet fighter; the $8.8 billion requested for ballistic missile defense; or the $5.7 billion requested for its “Virginia” attack submarine – none of which are particularly relevant to the fight against ISIS, the threat that Americans are most concerned about.
So while Americans are concerned about ISIS, the current spending proposals are cynically taking advantage of those concerns to throw more money at the Pentagon in ways that don’t address the threat, all while leaving programs at home in the lurch.
Republicans Ted Cruz & Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton. We expect false claims/lies,disinformation,misinformation, etc. during our recent elections that have greatly deteriorated since Republican Rchard Nixon. They use corporate media: talk shows, etc all for showing how nice they are (if they like the candidate) and conversely, how asinine one is (as most of both parties gang up on one guy, i.e. Trump).
That is why one has to use one's brain, i.e. located between the ears, to see the forest from the trees, But best to read so the brain can have time to properly process printed information and latter preferably from so-called alternative sources (versus corporate media) and usually more independent plus books re candidates (biographic, authorized and unauthorized).
And for many women and ethnic minorities, they like Clinton, just because she is a woman and/or politically correct (PC) --this latter attitude/behavior practically intitiated by the Clinton Whitehouse. And we know what much PC leads to. Not for me,.. if just a woman, I would have chosen Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren, who unfortunately chose to defer to the Democratic establishment.
So among the three liars, I would choose Donald Trump. He is not likeable, I do not even like him that I never watched his TV shows.
But at least I know the Donald openly show he is an iconoclast, usually tuned to play the market, but admits he plays politics when he declared his run. Not beholden to anyone, groups or even his Republican Party which
Despite such, he still goes on CONSISTENTLY as he is...GO..GO..TRUMP!!!
HILLARY KEEPS HER SERVER, AND KEEPS DENYING SHE NEVER LEAKED OR SHARED INFORMATION. I HOPE INVESTIGATIONS LEAD HER TO JAIL TERM.
Hillary refuses to take "truth serum" test:
MY #1 HYPOCRITE
Hillary, the astutely pandering "Democratic" politician, accuses her rivals Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican Donald Trump of anti-Semitism and/or supporting "terrorists." [Nowadays she and her ilk/kind lump anyone just speaking out/dissenting to official U.S. foreign policy as "supporting the enemy."].
Let us use our lazy brains and look at her own recorded acts and expressions in public and see her true color.
PDAF probe: Aquino’s most lethal weapon that pinned down opposition - Ri...
Follow Once in a while, but very rarely, we still get a gem of journalism work in TV news, which has degenerated into tabloid crime and cele
'On This Day' 1899: Philippine-American War Begins | Moral Low Ground
On February 4, 1899, the Philippine-American war began.
Clinton foundation’s Sweden fundraising arm cashed in as Stockholm lobbi...
Bill Clinton’s foundation set up a fundraising arm in Sweden that collected $26 million in donations at the same time that country was lobby
The Trey Gowdy/Hillary Clinton conspiracy: The real Benghazi scandal onl...
Republicans are trying to create a scandal where there isn't one -- while they ignore the biggest scandal of all VIDEO
David Brooks’ sickening Iraq apologia: How the New York Times hack just ...
The conservative New York Times columnist explains what he's learned from his Iraq war boosting: largely nothing
American role in the botched SAF operation « Bulatlat
Philippines news and commentary, politics, human rights, economy
The Elvis Presley coverup: What America didn’t hear about the death of t...
After Presley's death, an effort was launched to protect the reputation of the hospital that had treated him
The Life of Jesus: Faith Leaders On Jesus' Meaning - HuffPost Live
To Muslims, Jesus is the prophet Isa Ibn Maryam. To Jews, Jesus of Nazareth has traditionally been ignored, though that's starting to change
The Worst Thing About “Birth of a Nation” Is How Good It Is - The New Yo...
The release of “Django Unchained,” and the discussion surrounding it, have brought “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist
Home Modifications for Vision, Strength and Mobility Difficulties - AARP...
A little planning and these tips can turn disabilities into abilities.
Why attending wakes and not Senate hearings may in fact save Jojo Binay
In a culture that values community, to make ordinary people feel the sense of “damay” in periods of their mourning is to be deeply embedded