Profile

Cover photo
David Whitlock
Worked at Nitroceutic LLC
Attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lives in Needham, MA
856 followers|53,173 views
AboutPostsPhotos+1's

Stream

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
 

have signed up for it
Help end street harassment one hollaback at a time. As you catch those cree...
1
Add a comment...

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
2
Kristi Lewis's profile photo
 
No thanks;it has to be insanity.
Add a comment...
 
After what the GOP did in the House, with their rule change making Ryan the only one who can bring the bill to the floor, changing this in the Senate is justified. 
2
David Whitlock's profile photoRob Bush's profile photoBrian Holt Hawthorne's profile photo
5 comments
 
Yes, Cantor, but to me they all look the same.
Add a comment...

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
 
This is the same management strategy that did Enron in.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/23/stack_ranking_steve_ballmer_s_employee_evaluation_system_and_microsoft_s.html

Make everything about “competition” between individuals and you incentivize people to sabotage their co-workers. It is always easier to compete via sabotage than via creating. Anyone can sabotage.
3
1
Tessa Schlesinger's profile photoRob Bush's profile photo
 
Yeah. 

I'm reminded of the punchline to the old joke, "I don't have to run faster than the bear, I just have to run faster than you."

People will always try to outrun their companions when the bear is on their heels. And the easiest way to make sure you can outrun your companions is to whack them in the knee with a stick. This is a concept that seems foreign to the managers in question.

"First prize is a Cadillac El Dorado. Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you're fired." is a recipe for disaster.
Add a comment...

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
2
Brian Serviss's profile photoTravis Hayes's profile photo
3 comments
 
Nice point +Travis Hayes 
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
856 people
Marla Caldwell's profile photo
Stephanie Radomski's profile photo

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
 
Exactly the problem with a top-down power structure.  It seeks to protect the powerful in the power structure at the expense of the non-powerful in the power structure.

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/14/the-militarys-hail-mary/
1
Add a comment...
 
This is why the Senate is justified in ending the 60 votes for closure.  If the GOP can do this in the House, the GOP have shown themselves to be traitors.
2
1
Brian Holt Hawthorne's profile photo
Add a comment...

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
 
I just realized why issues of consent for sex are so controversial in Skepticism.

Because the default mindset in Skepticism is always “I don't know”.

If you haven't asked the question “do you want to have sex with me” in unambiguous terms and in a place and under circumstances where your potential partner feels safe enough to say “no”, or even “hell NO!”, then you are doing it wrong and are not a Skeptic and you don't care whether a “yes” or “no” is voluntary and uncoerced.

That is why there was so much push back against +Rebecca Watson  in elevator gate when she said “guys don't do that”. She wasn't telling guys to never ask women if they want to have sex, she was saying only ask that question at a time and in a place and under circumstances where a woman would feel completely safe to say “no”, because if she doesn't feel safe, then it is coercive. Maybe not as coercive as gamma-hydroxybutyrate, a knife or a firearm, but it is still coercive.

This isn't a big deal for guys who are mature in their Skepticism. They use cognition and reason to determine their actions. They only know things by going from facts to conclusions by using valid logic. If you don't have an unambiguous answer to an unambiguous question, as a Skeptic you have to default to “I don't know”.

This is also why there is so much push back. Because in Skepticism, the default is always “I don't know”. Skepticism should be a place where if a woman is unconscious and so obviously can't say “yes, I want to have sex with this specific person who has asked”, she has not consented to sex. If she is cognitively impaired by excess alcohol, she has not consented to sex.

Once you explain it, it becomes, “oh right, duh”, like many things in Skepticism. Of course, non-skeptics want to maintain their non-skeptical world view because they benefit from it by having sex with women who have not consented to having sex with them. All Skeptics are better off without them. Certainly female skeptics would be better off, but so would male skeptics. If every place where there are Skeptics becomes a safe and non-coercive place, then everyone of good will benefits.

There will continue to be push-back by pseudo-skeptics. They will continue to gas-light, to confuse, to increase the noise-to-signal ratio so they can use their real default, “all that matters is what I want”.

That is the whole point of the misogyny. To increase the “noise” so that even non-misogynists are perceived to be misogynistic. If misogynists make women feel unsafe everywhere, then there is no place that non-misogynists can ask them if they want to have sex. Misogynists don't care about the answer, so it doesn't matter to them. A toxic environment only inhibits the non-misogynists.
4
David Whitlock's profile photoAllen Hildebrandt's profile photo
15 comments
 
Do you know what the term “slander” means?

Wakefield didn't “slander” the field of immunology, Wakefield committed scientific fraud by lying in scientific publications.

“Slander” and “defamation” have specific meanings.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

A statement which is factually correct cannot be “slander”.
A statement of opinion cannot be “slander”.
Expressing opinions about a scientific field cannot be “slander”.

I have no idea what “scientific field” you think you are talking about, and how using

“silencing techniques based off of emotion that directly flies in the face of rationalism, skepticism and logic by utilizing shush words such as "Patriarchy", "Male Privelege", "Mansplaining", "Misogyny".”

could possibly be “slander” against that “scientific field”.

If you want me to think you have a rational argument, you have to show me the facts and logic of that rational argument. So far you haven't. Maybe you don't want to. Maybe you can't. Until I see some new facts and logic that pertain to an issue, I will default to the understanding that I have based on the facts and logic that I have access to.

I am not an expert on Patriarchy, Male Privilege, Mansplaining, or Misogyny. I am a male so misogyny is not usually exhibited toward me, and I try very hard to not express misogyny against any females. I am a male, so I do have Male Privilege, but I try to not use it for evil. I have been accused of mansplaining, but really try to not do so. I recognize the Patriarchy as just one of a number of Kyriarchies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyriarchy

My conceptualization of Feminism, and the type of Feminism I try to practice is the one where no one has Privilege over anyone but themselves.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_%28social_inequality%29

My opinion is that this would be a desirable social structure, which unfortunately we are very far from.

As far as I know, there are no facts and no logic that would contradict the desirability of such a social system.
Add a comment...

David Whitlock

Shared publicly  - 
 
Good discussion of the problem with misogyny online.
4
3
Karla Lucas's profile photoJane H's profile photoKate Childers's profile photoBrian Holt Hawthorne's profile photo
8 comments
Jane H
+
2
3
2
 
Ok yes that makes more sense +Brian Holt Hawthorne  ..thank you for clarifying. I have to say that at least in my experience that there are good people, men out there, that do stick up for women, and still troll a bit for LULZ. They have had my back...one answers everyone in Haiku...pretty funny actually. While I can't say that everyone is the same I think overall men need to stand up and support women online. The group of men that are attacking women network, chat and often have the same thing to say. After a while they become easy to spot and differentiate. They are not doing it for fun but are looking to do harm and create fear.  There are many times where guys attack and all it would really take is a few good men to put an end to it. The more we have these discussions the better...and the more men/women realize this is not a free speech issue but a hate speech  problem the sooner it will be resolved. 
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
856 people
Marla Caldwell's profile photo
Stephanie Radomski's profile photo
Work
Employment
  • Nitroceutic LLC
    Chief Scientist
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Needham, MA
Links
Story
Tagline
Pay it forward.
Bragging rights
I have donated over 89 pints of blood, that is more than 10 gallons and continue to donate regularly. Not everyone can donate, but I can, so I do.
Education
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Looking for
Friends, Dating, A relationship, Networking
Other names
I am straight (i.e. heteronormative male). I completely support LBGT etc. rights as human rights, even though I am straight. I sometimes post comments about such things because I feel they are important, especially anti-bullying and anti-hate stuff. I put this here because it is right after gender and I wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea of where I am coming from, especially women who might (mistakenly) think, "oh no, here is another good man who happens to be gay".
David Whitlock's +1's are the things they like, agree with, or want to recommend.
Hollaback!
market.android.com

Help end street harassment one hollaback at a time. As you catch those creeps in the act, you can submit your story to be recorded and mappe

A Conservative Guide to Rhetoric
www.newyorker.com

REGRESSION FALLACY. Finding cause where none exists. “A mere forty years ago, beach volleyball was just beginning … No bureaucrat would have

Senate May Consider 'Nuclear Option' On Debt Ceiling
www.huffingtonpost.com

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) suggested Sunday that some Senate Democrats may be willing to use what's known as the "nuclear option" to elimina

Misogynist Trolls Have An Agenda, And It’s Not Lulz | The Raw Story
www.rawstory.com

Of course, Mason interviews the guys who claim they're just in it for the “lulz” and discovers to no one's great surprise that actually, the

Why Robert Reich Should Be the Next Fed Chair
www.huffingtonpost.com

On Saturday, President Obama stated that he wants the next chairman of the Federal Reserve to not just be an economic wonk but to actively p

Sexual Harassment Is A Grassroots Political Movement | The Raw Story
www.rawstory.com

Note what he does after she tells him it's unwanted. If the purpose were to show off his physical assets in the hope that she'd be intereste

The Center For Inquiry Likes Atheism’s Cranky White Guy Image, So Screw ...
www.rawstory.com

The problem with that statement is that “all elements” of the secular movement most assuredly do not share the “common value” of “full equal

Baby of woman denied abortion in El Salvador dies after being born witho...
www.theprovince.com

SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador — The baby born to a Salvadoran woman who had been denied an abortion has died.

Bee-harming pesticides banned in Europe
www.guardian.co.uk

EU member states vote in favour of continent-wide suspension of neonicotinoid pesticides

How will the Boston shutdown affect workers?
www.salon.com

Labor leaders worry hourly workers will lose wages or vacation time for not making it to work during the shutdown

Facebook's big misogyny problem
www.guardian.co.uk

Soraya Chemaly: Advertisers and users are upset at inadvertent tolerance of abuse of women on the site. So why isn't Facebook taking more ac

Boston Bombings Have Lead to Multiple Revenge Attacks on Innocent Muslims
news.yahoo.com

The same week that the New York Post first falsely reported the Boston bombing suspect was a Saudi national then falsely put a Moroccan-Amer

FOCUS | Defeat Romney, Without Illusions About Obama
readersupportednews.org

'It is urgently important to prevent a Republican administration under Romney/Ryan from taking office in January 2013.' Daniel Ellsberg, RSN

Foreclosure Fail: Study Pins Blame on Big Banks
www.propublica.org

A study by government and academic researchers finds that approximately 800,000 homeowners missed out on mortgage modifications because of b

Lead poisoning toll revised to 1 in 38 young kids
news.yahoo.com

NEW YORK (AP) — More than half a million U.S. children are now believed to have lead poisoning, roughly twice the previous high estimate, he

Legacy of a half century of Athabasca oil sands development recorded by ...
www.pnas.org

Abstract The absence of well-executed environmental monitoring in the Athabasca oil sands (Alberta, Canada) has necessitated the use of indi

Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities
www.pnas.org

Abstract Democratic societies are built around the principle of free and fair elections, and that each citizen’s vote should count equally.

Charlotte Allen Demands Matriarchy | The Raw Story
www.rawstory.com

There was not a single adult male on the school premises when the shooting occurred. In this school of 450 students, a sizeable number of wh

Editorial boards savage Romney over Egypt/Libya
www.americablog.com

One of America's most influential progressive political blogs, providing news analysis of US politics, by John Aravosis in Washington DC