Kate Paulk will be organizing the Sad Puppies 4 effort for next year's Hugos, so it's interesting to see what her creative priorities are. Two things of note, for me...

#1. Her guideline #7, "The prose is invisible.", seems like a good way to toss out some of sf/f's best writers, including Vance, Wolfe, Lafferty, and so many others.This line from Jack Vance's "The Last Castle", for instance, is delightful and very much visible: "In the end, death came uniformly to all, and all extracted as much satisfaction from their dying as this essentially graceless process could afford." Prose I stop to admire in delight, or wonder, or the kind of bewilderment that leads to insight is a big part of why I read, and always has been.

#2. There's nothing on her list about world-building, at all. This isn't unique to this piece, either. None of the Puppies have much at all to say about world-building. I read sf/f for other places and times just as much for specific characters and stories within them, and one of the things that can make a work great is its setting. But seriously, they just don't talk about world-building, which seems to me like talking about cooking shows and never wondering how something tastes.

http://madgeniusclub.com/2015/05/28/so-what-is-hugo-worthy-anyway/
Shared publiclyView activity