Public
Truly eye-opening: According to a recent book, The Hedge Fund Mirage (http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118164318.html), by Simon Lack, from 1998 to 2010, 84% of the investment gains of the entire hedge fund industry went to the managers, and only 16% to the investors. The thievery of our "financial industry" beggars the mind. Never mind the 1%! This is a tiny fraction of the 1% fleecing the rest of the 1%.
According to The Financial Times:
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/c68c0250-379f-11e1-a5e0-00144feabdc0.html
"In fact, concludes Mr Lack, while many hedge fund managers have prospered from hefty fees, the bulk of their investment gains have not been shared with clients. On an asset-weighted basis, measuring cash invested to cash returned, hedge fund investors in aggregate, while narrowly beating the average return from equities, would have made more money over the past decade from investing in government bonds, and even from Treasury Bills.
"Of course the experience of 2008 colours these figures. According to Mr Lack, the hedge fund industry lost more money in that one year than all the profits it had generated during the previous 10 years. In fact most likely, he says, is that hedge funds lost more money for their investors in 2008 than the industry had made in its entire history. If true, that would put the industry up there with airlines and banks in the annals of long-term, non-productive performers from an investor perspective.
"Not that the managers have suffered the same way, of course. That is the brilliance of the hedge fund model. Between 1998 and 2010, the book shows, _even on favourable assumptions hedge fund managers earned an estimated $379bn in fees, out of total investment gains (before fees) of $449bn. In other words, they took 84 per cent of the investment profits their funds made, leaving just 16 per cent for the investors.
"Once you make adjustments for survivorship bias, fund of funds fees and so on, it is probable, he suggests, that hedge fund managers have kept all the money made, and investors have in aggregate received nothing_." [italics mine]
According to The Financial Times:
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/c68c0250-379f-11e1-a5e0-00144feabdc0.html
"In fact, concludes Mr Lack, while many hedge fund managers have prospered from hefty fees, the bulk of their investment gains have not been shared with clients. On an asset-weighted basis, measuring cash invested to cash returned, hedge fund investors in aggregate, while narrowly beating the average return from equities, would have made more money over the past decade from investing in government bonds, and even from Treasury Bills.
"Of course the experience of 2008 colours these figures. According to Mr Lack, the hedge fund industry lost more money in that one year than all the profits it had generated during the previous 10 years. In fact most likely, he says, is that hedge funds lost more money for their investors in 2008 than the industry had made in its entire history. If true, that would put the industry up there with airlines and banks in the annals of long-term, non-productive performers from an investor perspective.
"Not that the managers have suffered the same way, of course. That is the brilliance of the hedge fund model. Between 1998 and 2010, the book shows, _even on favourable assumptions hedge fund managers earned an estimated $379bn in fees, out of total investment gains (before fees) of $449bn. In other words, they took 84 per cent of the investment profits their funds made, leaving just 16 per cent for the investors.
"Once you make adjustments for survivorship bias, fund of funds fees and so on, it is probable, he suggests, that hedge fund managers have kept all the money made, and investors have in aggregate received nothing_." [italics mine]
View 40 previous comments
That's what you get when you put sociopaths in charge ...Jan 10, 2012
What's even worse but in a way that cannot be made better realistically is that if the fund makes a mistake regarding giving a client more money for any given transaction they cannot ask for it back whereas if the client receives less money they can claim it back.
An example was I found a massive bug in some pensions management software where a bonus was only to be applied to policies which had no death beneficiary each month. The clients old software had been applying this bonus to every policy for many years. The company had to just take it as a loss, therefore every single policy which wasn't on that particular plan took a loss. I bet these incidents which are rarely highlighted outside of a company are taken into account in this book.Jan 10, 2012
+Pedro Neira How true. Too bad our politicians don't see things that way. They created the inflated credit market to stimulate the economy, create jobs and raise tax revenue. The bubble burst and the tax payers are left holding the bag, and bailing out those who sponsored these actions in the first place.Jan 11, 2012
+TJ Downes I'd say it's evidence that you shouldn't put your money in hedge funds.Jan 11, 2012
+Victor Rodríguez Gil If you have enough money to put into hedge funds, can I have a spare $1M? :)Jan 11, 2012
+Glenn Snead I don't and you couldn't if I did :P. The point is, that's what you can learn from the article, and not much more...Jan 13, 2012
Add a comment...