Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Pastor David Henry
Rev.David A Henry. Jesus is not a second person in a polytheistic Godhead- Jesus is The only name that is revealed by himself.1 name only!
Rev.David A Henry. Jesus is not a second person in a polytheistic Godhead- Jesus is The only name that is revealed by himself.1 name only!


Post has attachment
Add a comment...

Proof that YHWH is not used by Jesus even before The name of God (Jesus)was revealed!!!

These are excerpts!!

"Originally, these four consonants [in YHWH] represented the four members of the Heavenly Family: Y represented El the Father; H was Asherah the Mother; W corresponded to He the Son; and H was the Daughter Anath. In accordance with the royal traditions of the time and region, God's mysterious bride, the Matronit, was also reckoned to be his sister. In the Jewish cult of the Cabbala God's dual male-female image was perpetuated. Meanwhile other sects perceived the Shekinah or Matronit as the female presence of God on Earth. The divine marital chamber was the sanctuary of the Jerusalem Temple, but from the moment the Temple was destroyed, the Matronit was destined to roam the Earth while the male aspect of Jehovah was left to rule the heavens alone." - Laurence Gardner, Bloodline of the Holy Grail, p. 18

Because the Hebrew language does not employ vowels in its written form, the correct pronunciation of the Ineffable Name of God was lost & not rediscovered until about 300AD by the Kabbalists who gave it the title Tetragrammaton, "the word of four letters," & "the square name," or more simply, "the square." At that time the Shem-ha-meforash became represented by the simple form YHVH. -Charles Ponce, Kabbalah, p 175

This hypothesis is not intrinsically improbable, and in Aramaic, a language closely related to Hebrew, "to be" actually is hawa--but it should be noted that in adopting it we admit that, using the name Hebrew in the historical sense, Yahweh is not a Hebrew name. -Ency Brit 11Ed Vol 15 p 321

The causative theme of hayah is found in no Semitic language, except the late Syriac, but is replaced by that of some other root. Those, therefore who still regard it as causative refer it to hawah, found once in Hebrew in the form hawa "fell"; they interpret this as "he who causes to fall" (Robertson Smith; cf. Arab. "haway". -Ency Brit 1958 Ed Vol 12, p 996

The Only TITLE Name God ever Gave himself in the Torah.
Is: I Am...... Ehyer Asher Ehyer
I Am that I Am or I will that I Will.

The oldest exegetes, such as Onkelos, and the Targumim of Jerusalem regard "Ehyeh" and "Ehyeh asher Ehyeh" as the name of the Divinity.
-Jewish Ency, Funk & Wagnalls, 1925 Ed p 119

So (I Am) is not translated yhwh or jehovah

Add a comment...

Whats the Original Name of God?

Is it yahweh?
1869, hypothetical reconstruction of the tetragrammaton YHWH (see Jehovah), based on the assumption that the tetragrammaton is the imperfective of Hebrew verb hawah, earlier form of hayah "was," in the sense of "the one who is, the existing."

Look at the year? 1869 AD

Jah (n.)
1530s, a form of Hebrew Yah, short for Yahweh "Jehovah." Used in some English bibles. Cognate with the second element in hallelujah and in Elijah.


tetragrammaton (n.)
1400, from Greek (to) tetragrammaton "(the word) of four letters," from tetra- "four" (see four) + gramma (genitive grammatos) "letter, something written" (see grammar). The Hebrew divine name, transliterated as YHWH, usually vocalized in English as "Jehovah" or "Yahweh."

Hmmmm? The year 1400?

1530, Tyndale's erroneous transliteration of Hebrew Tetragramaton YHWH using vowel points of Adhonai "my lord" (see Yahweh). Used for YHWH (the full name being too sacred for utterance) in four places in the Old Testament in the KJV where the usual translation lord would have been inconvenient; taken as the principal and personal name of God.

The vowel substitution was originally made by the Masoretes as a direction to substitute Adhonai for "the ineffable name." European students of Hebrew took this literally, which yielded Latin JeHoVa (first attested in writings of Galatinus, confessor to Leo X, 1516). Jehovah's Witnesses "member of Watchtower Bible and Tract Society" first attested 1933; the organization founded c.1879 by Charles Taze Russell (1852-1916); the name from Isa. xliii:10.

So these names are erroneous!!!!!

Anthropromorphic titles given TOO God by man.

The Only Name of God is JESUS?

Cite: history of names and words : etymology

Add a comment...

Is the Name of God(YHWH or like some yahweh) if it is the name than you have to accept his wife!!!!! Wife?

Between the 10th century BC and the beginning of their exile in 586 BC, polytheism was normal throughout Israel;[9] it was only after the exile that worship of Yahweh alone became established, and possibly only as late as the time of the Maccabees (2nd century BC) that monotheism became universal among Jews.[10][11] Some biblical scholars believe that Asherah at one time was worshiped as the consort of Yahweh, the national God of Israel.[10][12][13] There are references to the worship of numerous gods throughout Kings, Solomon builds temples to many gods and Josiah is reported as cutting down the statues of Asherah in the temple Solomon built for Yahweh. Josiah's grandfather Manasseh had erected this statue. (2 Kings 21:7) Further evidence includes, for example, an 8th-century combination of iconography and inscriptions discovered at Kuntillet Ajrud in the northern Sinai desert[14] where a storage jar shows three anthropomorphic figures and an inscription that refers to "Yahweh ... and his Asherah".[15][16] The inscriptions found invoke not only Yahweh but El and Baal, and two include the phrases "Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah" and "Yahweh of Teman and his Asherah."[17] There is general agreement that Yahweh is being invoked in connection with Samaria (capital of the kingdom of Israel) and Teman (in Edom); this suggests that Yahweh had a temple in Samaria, and raises a question over the relationship between Yahweh and Kaus, the national god of Edom.[18] The "Asherah" is most likely a cultic object, although the relationship of this object (a stylised tree perhaps) to Yahweh and to the goddess Asherah, consort of El, is unclear.[18] It has been suggested that the Israelites might consider Asherah as a consort of Baal due to the anti-Asherah ideology which was influenced by the Deuteronomistic History at the later period of Monarchy.[19] In another inscription called "Yahweh and his Asherah", there appears a cow feeding its calf.[20]:163 If Asherah is to be associated with Hathor/Qudshu, it can then be assumed that the cow is what's being referred to as Asherah.

Further evidence includes the many female figurines unearthed in ancient Israel, supporting the view that Asherah functioned as a goddess and consort of Yahweh and was worshiped as the Queen of Heaven.[15]

Asherah poles, which were sacred trees or poles, are mentioned many times in the Bible.

I have more proof that yahweh is not the Name of God!!! Nor does God(Jesus) have a wife YET!!!!
Add a comment...

We as Gentiles and Jews are now the New Israel.

Jesus told the parable of the Tenants in the Vineyard to show that as the Jews have rebelled against God, the kingdom of God will now be open to others as a consequence.

The allegorical meaning of the parable is clear; God is represented by the landowner, Israel is represented by the vineyard (likening Israel to a vineyard was common) and the Jewish authorities are represented by the tenants. The servants, sent by the owner, represent the prophets that God had sent to his people, who were then rejected and killed, even by the people who were claiming to be of God and obedient to him. The parable then explains that the landowner sent his ‘beloved son’ (Mark), which is of course Jesus, but ‘they seized him, killed him, and threw him out of the vineyard’ (Mark 12:8.) The end of the parable states that the owner will come and destroy the tenants and give the vineyard to others; Jesus is telling his audience that because of their disobedience, the opportunity to reach the kingdom of God will be given to the Gentiles. Jesus is teaching the Jews about the Kingdom of God and the parable represents God as a calm and patient judge, however the Pharisees saw the parable as something against them and wanted to arrest Jesus.
Add a comment...

Paleo-Hebrew/Samaritan/Aramaic/Masoretic Alphabet Symbols

The importance of seeing that Aramaic and modern so-called Hebrew is not Hebrew at all, lies in the fact that Aramaic and modern Hebrew descend from Gentile languages and not ancient Hebrew at all.

A comparison may be made by looking at the alphabet symbols. But what cannot be accepted is that Aramaic alphabet sounds were identical to ancient Paleo-Hebrew alphabet symbols. There has been a backward application of Aramaic alphabet symbol sounds upon ancient Paleo-Hebrew and this is linguistic fraud. This fraud is then expanded to explain how the tetragrammaton is both pronounced as to alphabet symbols and then the pronounciation of YHWH as Jehovah or Yahweh.

There is absolutley no truth to the claims by the tetragrammaton cults, that the ancient name of God was Jehovah or Yahweh, or Yahuah for that matter.

We already know the names Jehovah and Yahweh are invented names by catholic monks.

We also now know that modern scholars are calling the Masoretic scribes liars for vowel marking YHVH to be pronounced as Jehovah. Scholars now say Jehovah is a bastard name. It is not a true name. Then on the other hand claim that the Masoretic text had the hand of God upon the scribes who invented it so that it is without error. This is a contradiction. If God inspired the Masoretic scribes to vowel mark YHVH as Jehovah, how is it then a bastard name?

They bastardize the name Jehovah because they want to replace it with YHWH and then with Yahweh. Yahweh can be accounted for in the Assyrian Babylon pantheon by the clay tablets that records this ancient god. But the name Jehovah cannot be authenticated by any old clay tablets. We can see then that Yahweh has Assyrian Babylonian roots where as Jehovah as a name has catholic roots that date to about 1280AD.

One of the very apparent manipulation of alphabet symbol sounds has to do with the fifth letter in the chart. Many scholars will admit this symbol has the I, Y, and J sounds. Many scholars will not admit to the Y or the J sound and decipher the symbol as the Iod. But since Iod will not allow Yod or even Jod, this was fixed by modern scholars since the 1700s adding Y to the I and now we see the fifth letter being rendered as an I or Y sound and never the J sound. Only those scholars who are honest will admit the J sound. This is important because it shows that although there was no J letter symbol back then, there was a J letter sound back then going by a different alphabet symbol. After all, all of our English alphabet letter symbols do not exist back there. So will make a clamor against the J letter symbol. Why not admit that we are looking for identical alphabet sounds not identical alphabet symbols.

Aramaic is not Hebrew. Anyone who claims it is, is lying.

Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Jesus is God manifested in the flesh and came that we might be able to do this very thing REPENT...
Add a comment...

Post has attachment

Galatians 4:21-31 and Remnant Theology
The Tale of Both sides of the Coin
But what does the scripture say? "Cast out the slave and her son; for the son of the slave shall not inherit with the son of the free woman."
(Galatians 4:30
What does the above Scripture mean to you? It is clear that the slave and her son were cast out. The reason given is that the son of the slave could not inherit with the son of the free woman. Why not? Inherit what? Who is this slave woman? Who are her slave children? Who is this free woman? Who are Her Free Children?
How you as an Apostolic Christian choose to answer these questions will shape the way you view eschatology (study of the end times) and prophecy issues such as the rapture of the Church and the identity of the chosen people of God. In this allegory, the Apostle Paul unlocks the treasure chest and reveals the special treasures of the Bride. Will you follow his doctrine and receive these treasures? Or will you cast them down as nothing? The Devil wants Christians to do the latter.
The purpose of this Bible study is to interpret the meaning of this passage and how it applies to what I call Remnant Theology. Proceed from here with an open mind and the open Bible.
We, just as the Apostle Paul has done, will unlock the treasure chest and reveal these special treasures of the Bride. The treasure chest is the Scripture and the special treasures are the revelations within the Scriptures. These revelations will strengthen your faith and add dimension to your walk in Christ. Come let us reason together.
“O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you,
that ye should not obey the truth…?”
(Galatians 3:1 KJV Abridged)
The Apostle Paul faced a serious problem with the Church at Galatia. This Church sought to keep the commandments that are contained in the Law of Moses for righteousness. The Apostle Paul taught that if righteousness comes by the Law of Moses, then Christ is dead in vain (Galatians 2:21), and furthermore taught that Christ is the END of the Law for righteousness to everyone that believes (Romans 10:4).
Teachers came among this Church and brought another gospel than the One Paul preached. These taught that Christians should keep the Law of Moses. Paul thought that this was bewitching. It was these bewitching teachers whom Paul accused of bringing another gospel, and these according to the Apostle Paul were accursed for doing so (Galatians 1:6-9/Galatians 3:1-5).
Paul issues several Scriptural challenges to the doctrine being taught and believed in this Church. He was fighting spiritual warfare here, battling against false doctrine for the souls of these Saints, which were hanging in the balance. This is proof that false doctrine is not to be tolerated, but instead it is to be rebuked and corrected. Paul’s actions here go against the present day Church mentality of tolerating all beliefs and not seeking for Truth. There is absolute Truth, and we all are charged to SEEK.
False doctrine comes to destroy faith in the Truth, and thus jeopardizes the soul salvation of those who believe it and teach it. False doctrine is further strengthened because those who teach it believe that it is the Truth. These have been deceived, thinking that they are helping God’s Elect when in reality they are destroying God’s Elect by undermining the Truth. These think that they do God service, when in reality they do the work of the Devil.
Could false doctrine cause Christians to be lost? yes! The Apostle Paul writes in Galatians 5:4 that those who were bewitched by false doctrine about the Covenants had ‘fallen from grace.’ He taught that Christ had become of ‘no effect’ to these Christians who believed this false doctrine. Now if you have ‘fallen from grace,’ and Christ has become of ‘no effect’ towards you, then are you still saved?
Clearly not, so understand that this is very serious. What you believe about the Covenants and how they relate to each other can definitely have an effect on your soul’s salvation. Believing a false doctrine about the Covenants and how they relate to each other could destroy you. You could claim to be an ApostolicChristian and still die in your sins, yet thinking that you are right with God!
Paul challenges those Christians who would desire to be under the law. He puts forth an allegory to them in Galatians 4:21-31 which illustrates the Truth about the relationship between the two Covenants and those who are under each of them. We will now walk this text through, point for point.
It is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a bondmaid and the other by a free woman. Those of you familiar with the Genesis account know that this son by the bondmaid was named Ishmael, and the name of this bondmaid was Hagar (Genesis 16:15). It is also noted from the Genesis account that this son by the free woman was named Isaac, and the name of this free woman was Sarah (Genesis 21:3).
In this allegory, the two women are the two Covenants, Hagar represents the Old Covenant of bondage and Sarah represents the New Covenant of Promise. The two women also correspond to the two cities of Jerusalem, one earthly and one heavenly. Here is the Galatians 4 text in the RSV.
24 Now this is an allegory: these women are two covenants. One is from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery; she is Hagar. 25 Now Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia; she corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. 26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.
Hagar is the Old Covenant and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, the earthly Jerusalem. She is in slavery with her children. Sarah is the New Covenant and corresponds to the heavenly Jerusalem, the Jerusalem above, which is revealed in the book of Revelation chapter 21. Her children are free, and free indeed, being the children of promise!
The children of these two women represent the followers of the respective Covenants. Those ‘under the law’ are children of the bondmaid, or Ishmael. Those ‘under the New Covenant’ are children of the freewoman, or Isaac. Who are these ‘children of the freewoman?’ Well, Paul tells us the answer.
28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
There you have it, dear reader. Paul tells us here that ‘we,’ referring to the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ, are those children of the promise, like Isaac was. Thus ‘we,’ being the children of promise, are counted for the seed of Abraham! Read the Apostle Paul’s teaching on this in Romans 9:8.
We Christians are the children of the freewoman! Wow, what a revelation!
The children of the bondmaid, like Ishmael was, are the Jews of national Israel who seek to be ‘under the law.’ These refused to accept the complete work of Christ Jesus on Mount Calvary, and in fact kept on offering animal sacrifices in the temple after the crucifixion, as if the crucifixion meant nothing. These unbelievers and blasphemers are in bondage, and they are not free. To God, these unbelievers represent Ishmael, children of the bondmaid. The Apostle Paul reveals this to be so in his inspired writings.
The woman Hagar is also said to be Mount Sinai in Arabia. Who was at Mount Sinai? National Israel was at Mount Sinai, receiving the Ten Commandments (Exodus 19 and 20). Here in the allegory we see the bondmaid and her son. We see the Covenant here as the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments are called the ‘words of the Covenant’ in the Scripture (Exodus 34:28), the words of the Old Covenant.
It is written in Galatians 4:23 that ‘he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh, but he of the freewoman was by promise.’ In the Genesis account, the birth of Ishmael was after the flesh. Ishmael’s birth was not the fulfillment of God’s Promise. Thus this birth was after the flesh, and because of the will of the flesh, because it was Sarah’s will and reasoning that led to Abraham conceiving child with Hagar (Genesis 16:1-3).
Isaac’s birth was not after the flesh, and not because of the will of the flesh. Isaac’s birth was because of the Will of God, by promise. God promised Isaac to Abraham in the Genesis account. Abraham’s promise seed was to be counted after Isaac, and not Ishmael (Genesis 17:19, 21, Genesis 21:1-4).
Paul teaches that we, like Isaac was, are the children of promise. Our birth as Christians, the ‘new birth’ of John 3:3-5, was by promise and after the Will of God. We were not born after the flesh. We were chosen in him from before the foundation of the world! Read Ephesians 1:4 to see that it is true! We, like Isaac was, are truly children of promise! The Apostle John also saw that we were not born after the will of the flesh in John 1:12-13.
12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
The birth of those under the bondmaid is after the natural, that is, after the flesh. The system is natural and the city is natural (natural Jerusalem). The birth of those under the free woman is by promise, that is, after the Spirit. The system is Spiritual and the city is Spiritual (Jerusalem which is above). Jesus Himself taught this same concept to Nicodemus in John 3.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
In Galatians 4:27, Paul quotes a prophecy from the book of Isaiah 54:1. The prophecy is applied to the free woman Sarah, who in the allegory corresponds to the heavenly Jerusalem, which is the mother of us all.
Here in prophecy, the free woman receives a blessed message of promise. She is told to rejoice. Her womb was desolate, but now it is promised that the desolate one will have many more children than she who has a husband. Yes the barren womb would yield forth fruit. This fruit, according to the promise, would be numbered as the sand of the sea and the stars of the sky!
Yes, the children of the New Covenant have been many in number when you add up all the Saints that have ever lived, all over the world for the last 2,000 years and counting! Revelation mentions a great multitude that no man could number from all nations (Revelation 7:9-17)! Truly the woman with the desolate womb became the mother of many nations, just as God promised as it is written in Genesis 17:16! His promises are always true.
In Galatians 4:29, Paul states that he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit. Then Paul states ‘…even so it is now.’ What does this all mean? You probably think that it is obvious, and it is, but let’s go deeper, shall we?
He that was born after the flesh mocked him that was born after the Spirit. Ishmael mocked Isaac (Genesis 21:9). In the New Testament, we read about where the children of the flesh mocked the children that had been born of the Spirit (Acts 2:13).
The children of the bondmaid (law-keeping national Israel) persecuted the children of the free woman (New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ) fiercely and without mercy. The Apostle Paul was one of these antichrists before his conversion, a persecutor against those children of promise born after the Spirit (Acts 8:1-3, 9:1-2, 22:3-5/19-20, 26:9-11, Galatians 1:13-14).
Jesus told the Church that they would have to face persecution from the Jews who were antichrist (‘against Christ’). This persecution would not only be in the city of Jerusalem, but also from city to city (Matthew 23:34). This was accomplished by the Jewish antichrists throughout the book of Acts.
Now reader, follow the trail of innocent bloodshed at the hands of these Jewish antichrists so that you can see a full Bible scope of Galatians 4:29. I refer to these Jewish unbelievers as ‘antichrists,’ on the authority of Scripture as found in 1 John 2:22-23. Here is the trail of these antichrists.
In Jerusalem…
14 And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! 15 But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.
(John 19:14-15 KJV)
25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
(Matthew 27:25 KJV)
23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
(Acts 2:23 KJV)
40 And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.
(Acts 5:40 KJV)
59 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
(Acts 7:59 KJV)
In Antioch…
50 But the Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them out of their coasts.
(Acts 13:50 KJV)
In Iconium…
19 And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch and Iconium, who persuaded the people, and having stoned Paul, drew him out of the city, supposing he had been dead.
(Acts 14:19 KJV)
In Thessalonica…
5 But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.
(Acts 17:5 KJV)
Paul’s Epistle To The Thessalonians…
14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.
(1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 KJV)
We can see the Apostle Paul here writing to encourage the Church at Thessalonica. These saints were under heavy persecution from antichrists of their day. Paul says that God’s wrath is come upon those to the uttermost.
In Berea…
13 But when the Jews of Thessalonica had knowledge that the word of God was preached of Paul at Berea, they came thither also, and stirred up the people.
(Acts 17:13 KJV)
There you have it, persecution from city to city, just like Jesus foretold to Christians in Matthew 23:34. Persecution by ‘he that was born after the flesh’ against ‘him that was born after the Spirit,’ just as Paul stated in Galatians 4:29. Jesus’ and Paul’s doctrines line up here, point for point.
We now come to the focal point of this Bible Study. How does the Scripture text Galatians 4:21-31 relate to Remnant Theology? Well it is simple. Isaac replaced Ishmael when he came, because Isaac is what God promised all along. Ishmael was only a temporary arrangement, a parenthesis if you will, that was only to be in the picture until Isaac, the promise, came on the scene. Once Isaac came, then Ishmael would have to go away. The two could not inherit together because God’s promise was Isaac, not Ishmael.
It is the same with the two Covenants. Once Sarah’s womb conceived with the fulfillment of God’s promise, then Hagar’s days were numbered. Once Isaac was born, the promise was realized. Sarah was the mother of this promised seed, which was Isaac the true heir. In like manner, once Jesus came and established the New Covenant, the Old would vanish away.
19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made;
(Galatians 3:19 KJV Abridged)
9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
(Hebrews 10:9-10 KJV)
13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
(Hebrews 8:13 KJV)
These three passages are proofs which reinforce the Truths taught in Galatians 4:21-31. The Scripture in Galatians 3:19 is plain that the law was added, until the seed should come to whom the promise was made.
This means that the law had a definite beginning, and a definite ending! Galatians 3:16 states that this seed, to which the promises of Abraham were made to, is Jesus Christ. Therefore when Christ came, the end of the law was upon us. On Mount Calvary, at the crucifixion, Jesus took the law away so that he could establish the New Covenant of God’s grace and Truth.
17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
(John 1:17 KJV)
The law began at Mount Sinai and ended at Mount Calvary! The New Covenant replaced the old covenant, and in allegory this is Hagar being replaced by Sarah. Thus it follows that Isaac also replaces Ishmael. That which was born by promise replaced that which was born after the flesh!
The Scripture says that the bondmaid and her son were cast out! So not only was the law (the old covenant) cast out, but those who attempt to keep the law for righteousness were cast out also, being her children in bondage.
The reason given was because the son of the bondmaid could not inherit and be heir with the son of the free woman. The son of the bondmaid was not the heir. The Apostle Paul saw this clearly and wrote in Romans 4:14.
14 For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:
They who are of the law cannot be heirs. This is because the law covenant is not the covenant that was promised. The New Covenant is the Covenant which was promised, from before the foundation of the world.
Now Remnant Theology comes into play. Of old time, though the number of the children of Israel would be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved. Isaiah prophesied this and the Apostle Paul quoted it in Romans 9:27. Our Apostle then picks up the same thought in Romans 11:5, letting it be known that this remnant of the children of Israel is ‘according to the election of grace.’ Not of the works of the law, but by grace! Not by the law, but by promise! Promise is the fulfillment of the temporary jurisdiction of the law!
Those who saw this truth among national Israel, are the remnant who shall be saved. Those among national Israel who reject this truth, are forever damned. For those antichrists, there is no hope, neither in this world or the next. Only the remnant of Israel would be saved by Christ’s grace and leave the bondage of the temporary old testament law and old Jerusalem for the liberty of the promised New Covenant and the New Jerusalem.
The Scriptures are clear. The New Covenant forever replaced the old covenant, represented in allegory by Sarah replacing Hagar. The children of the New Covenant forever replaced the children of the Old Covenant, represented in allegory by Isaac replacing Ishmael. The remnant of Israel, according to the election of grace, is all that would be saved from the bondage of the temporary old and move on into the liberty of the everlasting New. The rejecting, nay saying, persecuting, unbelieving natural Jews are cast out with the old covenant and the old Jerusalem.
How then can the dispensationalists teach that law keeping national Israel, in unbelief and denial of Jesus as the Christ and in rejection of the New Covenant, are still ‘God’s Elect’ or ‘God’s chosen people?
In God’s eyes, these unbelievers and antichrists are Ishmael, cast out with their mother Hagar who in the allegory represents the Old Covenant. Now was Ishmael ‘God’s Elect’ or ‘God’s chosen?’ No, because he was not by promise, but instead was after the flesh.
In God’s eyes, we are Isaac, the true children of Abraham and heirs according to the promise. We are they who were born by promise, by the Spirit. We were not born after the flesh.
We are God’s Elect! We are God’s Chosen People, chosen in Him even from before the very foundation of the world! Will you embrace these treasures of the Bride? Will you shed unscriptural traditions, buy the Bible truth and sell it not? Will you accept the fullness of the New Covenant?
May the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ rise up and claim the fullness of her identity in God. We are the chosen generation and holy nation, which in times past were not a people, but are now the people of God (1 Peter 2:9).
Let us therefore show forth the praises of Him who called us out of darkness.
Presented with all this Light, how can any Christian ever go to take up the Law of Moses for righteousness as these Galatians were bewitched into doing? How can any Christian be a Sabbath day keeper, or a keeper of any part of a cast out and vanished away covenant?
How can any Christian teach and believe that those of the law, Ishmael, are ‘God’s Elect’ or ‘God’s Chosen People?’ How can any Christian be dispensationalist and believe that these cast out unbelieving antichrists are ‘God’s Elect’ and ‘God’s Chosen People?’ Such Christians are deceived.
Believe the Remnant Theology Truth about the Covenants. He took away the first, so that He may establish the second! All 613 precepts of the Law, the Old Covenant, were taken out of the way and nailed to His cross!
14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
(Colossians 2:14 KJV)

David Henry

Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded