Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Our Common Ocean
Conserving the ocean through education.
Conserving the ocean through education.


Post has attachment
Latest blog post looking at sea bass fisheries in the north-east Atlantic.

Post has shared content
I have a confession... I don't know what I'm doing. I didn't mean to become a marine science communicator but here I am.

The +Google+ platform and all of you Google Plussers who have followed, liked, shared, commented, and directly contacted me are a huge part of my marine science communication success. I thank you all and hope that our journey continues together for a long time to come.

I wrote a blog post for the Canadian Network for Ocean Education (CANoE) outlining my journey into marine science communication and how you (yes, even you reading this with a raised eyebrow if that is what you want to do) can do it too.

Comments as always welcomed.

#sciencecommunication #oceanliteracy

Post has shared content
In line with the No Limits? campaign, the Shark Trust has joined forces with Shark Advocates International and Project AWARE for ICCAT (responsible for the conservation of tunas and tuna-like species (including sharks) in the Atlantic), in a bid to encourage the adoption of science-based catch limits for Blue Sharks and Shortfin Mako. We are also calling for an extension of the prohibition on the retention of Porbeagles and a total ban on removing shark fins at sea, adopting best practice as required by EU vessels. Find out more at

Post has shared content
“Ecology and distribution of European Sea Bass in inshore and coastal waters in South West England” This one isn’t plankton-related, but my colleagues @Dr_Emma_Sheehan and @MJAttrill are looking for a PhD student to carry out a funded project examining…

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
Ocean acidification spells trouble for mariculture

In this second of a three part series looking at potential climate change and ocean acidification impacts on the mariculture industry I have written for The Fish Site, I focus on ocean acidification impacts - some of which have already been experienced.

The article is open access (no sign-up required!)

* Mariculture is a subdivision of aquaculture that deals with marine species

#marinescience   #science   #aquaculture   #mariculture   #climatechange   #oceanacidification  

Post has shared content
DNews explains the importance of plankton

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
How deep is too deep for commercial fishing?

Our ever-improving technology has allowed us to fish longer, catch more, and move further from land.  It has also allowed us to fish deeper.  EU statistics indicate that between 1950 and 2006 fishing depths increased from an average depth of 407 metres, to 535 metres.

Life in the deep is slow paced.  Food is scarcer than in the sunlit surface waters.  Species grow slower and live longer.  Some deep sea corals, like the one in the image, are thought to be over 4,000 years old. Traits like these are why organisations like +Marine Conservation Institute that ” The deep sea is the world’s worst place to catch fish” .  It’s not just the sustainability of targeted species that is causing concern, but of those caught as bycatch, as well as damage to the seabed and the flora and fauna living in and on it – like the coral in the photo.  So can deep sea fishing ever be managed sustainably?    A recently published study from Joanne Clarke, a PhD student at the +University of Glasgow, and colleagues suggests that there might be a way to make the practice less damaging.

It’s all about depth
The team took a look at trawl survey data undertaken between 1978 and 2013 in the northeast Atlantic.  The surveys used a range of different gear types, were taken at a number of different locations, and varied in depth - between 240 and 1,500 metres.  The data provided the researchers with four ‘indices’ to calculate - Simpson’s diversity index (a measure of diversity), the ratio of “discarded” (bycatch species) to commercial biomass (sellable species), the ratio of Elasmobranchii (sharks and rays) to commercial biomass, and finally the value per square kilometre of each trawl.

Running this data through some fancy analysis, the researchers found some clear patterns.  First, fish diversity increases with depth – an average of 18 new species are encountered for every 100 metres depth you go down.  The ratio of discard biomass to commercial biomass also increased with depth.  At 600 metres the ratio was 0.3:1 but by 1,300 metres, the ratio reached 1.6:1.  The ratio of Elasmobranchii biomass to commercial biomass significantly decreased between depths of 500-600 metres, but then steadily increased again.   The value per unit effort was more variable over depth.  The team found significant decreases in value in trawls between depths of 400–700 metres, but rose again when trawls were around 1,300 metres deep.  The team point to the dominance of rock grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) - a commercially valuable species that lives at these depths as the primary reason for the rise in trawl value at 1,300 metres. 

Based on the results, the researchers recommended that a ban on deep sea trawling would be good for biodiversity, meet a number of conservation targets and EU legislation – including those for deep sea sharks which are believed to be highly vulnerable to deep sea fishing, without much cost to the industry (the obvious exception being any that were to target rock grenadier at depths of 1,300 metres.  If you are wondering if fisheries do go that deep… orange roughy is the most deeply fished species – 1,500 metres below the sea surface).

Politically timely
With deep sea fishing causing widespread concern among academics, NGOs, and those concerned with the environment, fishery managers around the world are being pressed to take action to minimise any impacts this industry can have.  Last year the European Union parliament rejected proposals to completely phase out deep-sea bottom trawling and gill-netting – both considered to be highly damaging activities.  The EU are meeting again this month to discuss how deep sea fishing could be more sustainable – including introducing depth limits to bottom trawling.  The authors hope that the politicians will take note of their findings.   

Are depth limits controversial?
When it comes to fishing, there isn’t much that is not controversial.   Bertie Armstrong, chief executive of the +Scottish Fishermen's Federation responded to this study in a press release.  He is not happy with the idea of banning fishing at depths below 600 metres, and does not see the conservation benefit.  ”Using scientific survey data to draw conclusions upon commercial fishing activity is fraught with danger” Bertie said. ”This is because such information is normally collected via random trawl sampling, whereas commercial fishing tows are very targeted and aimed at specific species or groups of species” .   Bertie argues that commercial boats use much more selective nets that have larger meshes compared to those used in scientific sampling.  He also believes that trawls will become more selective in the future.

The original paper
The paper was published in the journal Current Biology.  The authors have paid for the paper to be open access, so why not have a read of it yourself

The Fishermen’s perspective
Bertie Armstrong’s comments can be viewed on the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation website

The Image 
Like many commercial fishing techniques, bottom trawling produces bycatch of both plants and animals.  Here, a bottom trawler dumps ancient deep sea coral overboard.  Credit © +Greenpeace International/Malcolm Pullman/Marine Photobank

#science #sciencesunday #marinescience #fishing #deepsea #fisheries   #bycatch  

Post has shared content
We're looking forward to +thebluemile this Saturday in Plymouth, UK!

Come and cheer us on we #swim, #kayak and stand up paddle a mile on the water. Or if you fancy #fundraising for #sharks why not take part - there's still time to register at

We're aiming to raise £10,000 to support our work, including The Great Eggcase Hunt and our vital No Limits? campaign to create a sustainable future for the Blue Shark and other exploited species in our waters.
Wait while more posts are being loaded