I open my first philosophy topic.

I took time to open fist topic, because i wanted to improve my ability to do a correct esposition my thoughts in english.

Question is about the persistence of the condition of freedom in an enviroment without the paradigma of free will.

I'm not really intrested the moral or ethic vision of free will, that is surelly intresting, but the logic and rational consequence choise to not considerate it in the social model of freedom.

Theory behind this sentence is that we can't easy demostrate existence of free will as well of existence of concept of natural right (two phenomenum that are probably connected). but i think we can demostrate that without the paradigma of free will we can't have freedom, we have something different with the same name (i coudl add that without natural right you can't have a natural dignity as human being)

I personally find intresting argoument, and i was thinking to write something about (i'm working on a song), for 3 main reasons:

1) orign and evolution meaning of freedom coudl be associate to the specific evolution of concept of free will if they are in some way correlate, in this case we have a point of connection to exit the loop where end the abstractions out of history

2) there is a inverse tendency to increase concept of freedom in absence of free will, that if is in contraddiction and in paradox factor, it mean you are increasing something else with the wrong name

3) rethink the way we connect freedom to a new and modern rational defintion of free will (it mean artificial, do by the law, at this point), open new ways for the evolution of civil rights that are not associate directly a difficult to define (without elements that shape it) and relativistic concept of freedom, but the necessity to wirte laws about your right to experience a real free will, and about conditions necessary that allow you right to real chose main point fo existentialism.

Thank listen me.