Yang Rui's Lost Tweets Part 8: The Jews Control America's Finances

Back in 2011, CCTV host Yang Rui published several posts on his Sina Weibo discussing his views on Israel and Jews. These posts were published and translated by the Shanghaiist blog on May 24, 2012, shortly after Yang generated controversy with his Weibo posts praising the Chinese government for "cleaning up foreign trash" and "kicking out that foreign bitch" (a reference to Al Jazeera reporter Melissa Chan). http://shanghaiist.com/2012/05/24/cctv-yang-rui-anti-semite.php

Within days of the Shanghaiist drawing attention to Yang's 2011 posts, those posts (like the "foreign trash" posts) were deleted. I have no idea whether Yang deleted them himself or if Sina censored them. Either way, I've taken screenshots of three of the posts, and will post them along with translations of the posts and the comments.

October 24, 2011 - http://www.weibo.com/1348026261/xufzEf5NO

Americans are free but not equal -- two party politics opposes government interference with society, after the financial crisis blew up not one person has been brought to task. Whoever wants to be the President has to curry favor with the Jews because they hold both the financial and media worlds in their grasp. Whoever wins a general election must yield to the choices of the voters. Average Americans have the right to bear firearms, but the right to be free from harm is extremely not equal. America has freedom in immigration but there are several million illegal immigrants, and these illegal immigrants essentially become like black slaves.

Comments

Teacher, there is no country that has absolute equality. A society should be considered just if it is able to achieve governance for the people, is comparatively honest, listens to the people, and has impartial justice.

From the beginning a major goal of American law was the provision that citizens were permitted to own guns, so as to permit the public to oppose illegal activities. If Chinese people were permitted to own guns, then China would similarly not descend into chaos if when all is said and done the average person still had some understanding.

As a host, if you decide to explain something by way of cursing everyone and everything, then its better if you don't call yourself a host.

This critique from Mr. Yang is a bit moribund in its thinking. America's policy problems are not the result of one person's handling.

If you can use a gun to kill the innocent, you can also use a knife, poison, or a car to achieve the same result. Do you want to restrict knives?

Do you have data on how many people die in America each year from private firearms? Have you considered the advantages that private gun ownership brings? If China permitted private firearms, would officials still dare victimize people?

Property is the greatest attribute of slavery, and the descendents of slaves remained as property, and were unable to control their own destiny. But illegal immigrants are completely free people. They can change jobs, and if they want to return to their country, they can return to their homeland at any time, with an airplane ticket courtesy of the US government. Their offspring will be genuine Americans. Exactly in what way to see these illegal immigrants as being like slaves? Do you not feel like these illegal immigrants should be thanking the US government?

America isn't as good as we think it is, nor is it as bad.

If two party politics opposes government interference in society, then does one party wink at government interference in society?

This reasoning is no different than an unsuccessful student, do not ridicule an outstanding student for having failed to achieve a perfect test score. In the end you're just jealous and hateful.

Its better than places with no freedom and no equality.

The situation is like this.

"The right to be free from harm is extremely not equal." Is there any normal person who can understand what this means?

It is very philosophical in appearance. You cannot confuse equality-in-law with equality-in-fact, potential equality with resulting equality. You also can't confuse freedom and equality.

The problem is why are so many people willing to illegally immigrate and not willing to remain in their homeland? Does this indicate that being in one's homeland is less preferable to illegally immigrating (and becoming a black slave)? Thinking about it!!

Teacher Yang sums it up nicely.

Half hell, half heaven.

Yang Rui's Post and Comments - Chinese

美国人自由但不平等:两党政治反对政府干预社会,金融危机爆发后无一人被问责;谁想当总统必须讨好犹太人,因为他们掌握金融和新闻界;获得普选胜利者要让位选举人的选举;美国平民拥有枪支的自由,但是免于受害的自由非常不平等;美国移民自由,但是非法移民者有几百万,这些非法移民成为变相黑奴

Comments

老师,没有一个绝对平等的国度,只要能做到执政为民,相对清廉,倾听民声,司法公正,这应该就是一个公平的社会了。

当初美国法律上规定允许民众持有枪支的主要目的,就是允许民众与违法的行为去抗争。如果允许中国民众持有枪支的话,中国也同样不会乱了阵脚,毕竟百姓的觉悟还是存在的。

做为一个主持人,如果用骂大街的方式来说明一个问题,最好还是不要称自己是主持人。。。

老杨这次的评论有点惯性思维了,老美的政策出问题不是处理哪一个人的事儿。

能用枪杀死无辜,同样可以用菜刀投毒交通工具来完成。你要紧菜刀吗?

你有数据美国到底一年有多少死于私人枪支吗?你有考虑私人持枪所带来单位好处吗?如果中国允许私人持枪,官吏还敢鱼肉百姓吗?

奴隶最大的属性是财产,奴隶的后代还是财产,无法控制自己的命运。但是非法移民是完全的自由人,可以换工作,只要想回国,随时随地回祖国,机票还美国出。他们在美国的后代是正宗的美国人。你觉得这些非法移民到底在那方面象奴隶?你不觉得这些非法移民最感谢的就是美国政府吗?

美国没我们现象的那么好,也没我们现象的那么差

两党政治反对政府干预社会;那么一档就纵容政府干预社会?

作为一个差生,别老嘲笑一个优等生为什么没有考满分的道理是一样的。尽管你是多么羡慕嫉妒恨

比既没自由又不平等的地方还是强不少。

情况属实。

”免于受害的自由非常不平等“,这句话有正常人类能看懂的吗。

貌似很有哲理。不能混淆法理的平等和事实实现的平等,机会的平等和结果的平等。更不能混淆自由和平等。

问题在于为什么那么多人愿意非法移民也不愿意待在自己的祖国呢?是否说明在自己的祖国还不如做非法移民(变相黑奴)呢?深思中!!

杨老师的总结相当到位。

一半地狱,一半天堂
Photo
Shared publicly