Profile

Cover photo
Ted Green
16 followers|7,117 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideosReviews

Stream

Ted Green

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
• “***yet for us there is but one God, the Father***, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him.” 1 Corinthians 8:6

Father - God - One looking in the mirror (Logic);
Son - God's reflection (perspective of how you look at Logic - Reason - Logos);
Holy Spirit - Actual composition of mirrored reflection (God is Spirit).

--------------------
Human Parallel (created in image):
Adam - Father (reflector)
Eve - Son (reflection, vertical single definition)
Children - Holy Spirit, horizontal infinite definition)

MAN Parallel: 
DNA - Father (behind perception)
MAN (perceivable reflection of DNA 1:1 - body) - Son
CELLS - Holy Spirit (perceivable reflection of body's infinite composition +:1)
------------------------

Humans represent the Holy Spirit as we are the body (cells) of Christ (Son's) ONE body. We are the extension of God (children). We are minds and God is a Mind (Son). We see God as 1 Big Mind. 1:1 ratio...God is One. However there are 3 essential perceptions of God (think of 2D example of squares and cube) in which He operates as ALL AT ONCE.

Absolute Truth (Father) knows everything..including how Absolute Truth "looks" - this requires perception, this knowledge is also intrinsic to AT because He knows everything - therefore there were always multiple perspectives of God at start..When God (Father) sees Himself, He sees a single (Son) infinite truth (Holy Spirit). 

Hopefully this should suffice as proof of "Trinity"
- I would say Trinity is bad name - Just One God, as 3 perspectives. Don't think of 3 separate entities, think more of 3 levels (Logic, Reason\Definition (single), Reason\Definition (infinite))

Ted Green

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
To me this makes perfect sense. You have the quantum mind theory which is basically the informational version of how our mind perceives information (3D universe construct). We forget sometimes that we perceive in a different ways at the same time - i.e. - what is there (valid) and what is not there (invalid). Also, we quantum mechanics and the realization that we are in a mathematical (concept) based universe, can we officially call materialism dead already?

Ted Green

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
When Peter Ulric Tse speaks about information (around the 40min mark) and how (neurons) detect patterns in physical information. I as a Christian say, "Hallelujah. But keep going sir. On your worldview what is the definition of a "pattern" in a random chance naturalistic universe? Moreover, in a universe of random 'evolution (a pattern itself)' how can you have almost as much pattern as matter? The literal opposite should be happening." The Christian position should align with the ultimate conclusion of science that all observation (quantum physics) is information (conceptual reality); Theists should celebrate, 1. God is the mind that forms this conceptual reality of information for lesser conceptual beings to 'play in'. 2. The 'force' that actual holds patterns together to even be recognized a patterns would need be outside of matter itself, and of course can only be observed by beings with the capacity to do so - again, minds.


BTW here is a BIG Hint. Neurons ready the physical patterns in reality (what is there to make sense of) . The spirit parallel of the neurons (the mind) has the ability to actually INTERPRET it (rationality / how can I make sense of, the what my neurons picked up - see answer in min 48)

I think science is getting closer and closer to the result theists have know all along. Rationality is only consistent if a mind understands truth. Truth must be objective. Truth is that when the naturalist and his atheist buddies reach the summit, they'll run in a theist settlement with our flag of "we told you so" whisking in the breeze.
Have him in circles
16 people
Carole Fennell's profile photo
Tony Proctor's profile photo
Od Dub's profile photo
soulbrothermike1's profile photo
James Henry's profile photo
Sariyah Dublin's profile photo
Steve Drabik's profile photo
Lee .Bostic's profile photo
Joseph DElia's profile photo

Ted Green

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
As a Christian I am impressed with this video. I would like to say is its mostly accurate: We are a mind - a definition reflecting on itself to create the subjective truth we perceive. No issues with the things along that line...my issue is that it doesn't go a step further...who turned our reasoning capabilities on, by what standard do we base definition itself or the definition of subjective truth off of? I'd like to say that God is the objective truth which extends Himself (breathes into) as mini living truths (us) allowing us to find our way back toward Him (objective truth). In other words, subjective truth on its own is wholly irrelevant. It serves no ultimate purpose other than what it makes of it on the inside of its perception. To assume there is nothing outside of our perception as contingent truth-life-perspectives (minds) ourselves it idiotically premature. In fact, we are the seeds that grow from the field of absolute truth (more specifically Absolute Reason (Son) which is the reflection of Absolute Truth (Father). We do not create the definitions which we perceive, we merely borrow them. We perceive because something already provide the basis for perception itself (from the inside we view ourselves as gods - fall of man), but from the outside God see a prodigal son searching to climb beyond his subjective limitations. <<- This is what separate sons of God and wannabe gods. Definitions that undercut truth are invalid definitions, they die. Why do you think that on this plane we experience death? It is a parallel to our minds which are dying because we the contingent definition have divorced ourselves from Death. I pray everyone that reads this understands what is really happening. Do not be fooled to accepting your subjective truth as actual truth. That is the lie that leads to death.

Ted Green

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Chris 'I'm going to be using logic and empirical science"' - Well..according to SCIENCE Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. See Oxygen and upscale mutation problems. Just because you have nice graphs and pictures DOESN'T mean its true. I'd rather put my faith in something that can be true (God) then something that can't be true (Evolution).


Love this line "they developed moral values" - because thats pure fact too right? Completely objective detail. His whole story is beyond blind faith. At least we Christians says, God said this about history and we wrote it down...science gets a few NON-EVOLUTION fossils and makes an ENTIRE history out of it. You are kidding right?


"It gets you High, you do it because it gets you high" - NO, I do it because ABSOLUTE TRUTH is real. Life is about finding truth, NOT about "getting high".

Science is a neutral tool....wait...wait...wait..WHO IS DOING SCIENCE? People must INTERPRET DATA. This guy is straight lying to the public.
People
Have him in circles
16 people
Carole Fennell's profile photo
Tony Proctor's profile photo
Od Dub's profile photo
soulbrothermike1's profile photo
James Henry's profile photo
Sariyah Dublin's profile photo
Steve Drabik's profile photo
Lee .Bostic's profile photo
Joseph DElia's profile photo
Links
YouTube
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Apps with Google+ Sign-in
  • New Words With Friends
Very nice and friendly people. Been going their for years. Good and prompt service.
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago
1 review
Map
Map
Map