Resharing this again now there are more people on Google+. Could monetizing streams be an economic model for the social web? What do you think?
I really like the combination of streams + circles. It works. So here's something I've been mulling over for a while:

I really like the idea of Rather than buying an album, you subscribe to an artist's feed, and get access to songs, photos etc as they're produced. That makes a lot more sense to me as a 21st century model for music.

I also follow a lot of writers that I admire, mostly over on Twitter. They don't post their work there, of course, because there's no revenue stream for it. But I do get to see what William Gibson, Margaret Atwood et al are thinking on a daily basis. Awesome.

What if I could pay a subscription to the writers & artists I admired, and see their latest content as part of my stream? Short stories to peruse offline, songs to pull to my iPod, and so on. Not to mention academic articles from journals, mini-games from indie developers and so on.

This works best on a decentralized web of nodes. The artist has their home base, eg at They then push out their content, and people can subscribe on Google+, Facebook, in their RSS reader, in a specialized app, from their WordPress dashboard, and so on.

And suddenly you have a monetized decentralized social web. Paid licenses are just one of many kinds of access controls on stream content; circles and access control groups are certainly another. And of course, content can be made available publicly too.

Any interest? +Marc Canter & +Evan Prodromou, I'm particularly interested in your thoughts.
Shared publicly