Some pointed questions for supporters of this initiative (who I presume to be mostly liberals, since I saw this in a Ben and Jerry's):
1. Is the Sierra Club an individual? How about Planned Parenthood? The New York Times? The Democratic Party? If you answered no to any of those questions, what do you anticipate will be the consequences of amending the constitution to repeal literally all of their constitutional rights?
2. How, if at all, do you go about publishing a pamphlet, newspaper, book, or website without spending money? Will there be grey areas in the definition of what counts as spending money? Who do you expect will be best able to navigate those restrictions, and risk entering those grey areas?
3. Do you trust a legislature elected under the current system to write the regulations this amendment would allow? If not, why are you asking them to do it? If so, what problem are you trying to solve?