Communities and Collections
Posts
Hello Tag Assistant community:
are there any Google officials monitoring this community, or it's a dead-end ready-to-be-erased one, as I'm not seeing any help whatsoever here and there are quite a few bugs related to Tag Assistant extension listed with no answer.
If you guys know between us people who are working on this, please tag them so we can start pinging them to address these issues.
Thanks.
are there any Google officials monitoring this community, or it's a dead-end ready-to-be-erased one, as I'm not seeing any help whatsoever here and there are quite a few bugs related to Tag Assistant extension listed with no answer.
If you guys know between us people who are working on this, please tag them so we can start pinging them to address these issues.
Thanks.
Tag Assistant extension doesn't show the UA- code if implemented into GTM as Google Analytics Settings variable (as it should be correctly), but only as a Constant.
GTM setup for GA UA- code:
1) if implemented as a Constant: https://www.screencast.com/t/eBXQbQcC it's shown within the Tag Assistant as related to the actual GTM: https://www.screencast.com/t/S3mUDASUuv0
2) if implemented as a Google Analytics Settings tracking ID variable: https://www.screencast.com/t/k1P9AXpnD it's not shown anymore within the Tag Assistant extension: https://www.screencast.com/t/0B1FSwgoB
Does anyone know why?
Is there any fix for this to be able to see which UA- code is assigned to which GTM account if implemented correctly with the help of GA Settings variable?
Thanks.
Arthur
GTM setup for GA UA- code:
1) if implemented as a Constant: https://www.screencast.com/t/eBXQbQcC it's shown within the Tag Assistant as related to the actual GTM: https://www.screencast.com/t/S3mUDASUuv0
2) if implemented as a Google Analytics Settings tracking ID variable: https://www.screencast.com/t/k1P9AXpnD it's not shown anymore within the Tag Assistant extension: https://www.screencast.com/t/0B1FSwgoB
Does anyone know why?
Is there any fix for this to be able to see which UA- code is assigned to which GTM account if implemented correctly with the help of GA Settings variable?
Thanks.
Arthur
Post has attachment
Helo all,
Anyone which have seen these new notifications from within Google SDTT and have any clues what they represent?
Thanks :)
Anyone which have seen these new notifications from within Google SDTT and have any clues what they represent?
Thanks :)

Post has shared content
One week until the Semantic Search Marketing Open Forum on Google+ - http://bit.ly/SemSearchForum
Got a question for our panel? Ask at the link above, or on Twitter by using the hashtag #SemSearch .
Got a question for our panel? Ask at the link above, or on Twitter by using the hashtag #SemSearch .

Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Hi Guys,
Any Google Analytics Official cares to get involved into this issue?
https://code.google.com/p/analytics-issues/issues/detail?can=2&start=0&num=100&q=&colspec=ID%20Component%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Stars%20Summary&groupby=&sort=&id=408
Thanks.
Any Google Analytics Official cares to get involved into this issue?
https://code.google.com/p/analytics-issues/issues/detail?can=2&start=0&num=100&q=&colspec=ID%20Component%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Stars%20Summary&groupby=&sort=&id=408
Thanks.
Post has attachment
anonymizeIP function for multiple trackers on a single page fails! => SOLVED!
I've implemented the anonymizeIP function and when debugging this implementation, I get the following error:
Called method "_anonymizeIp" threw exception.TypeError: Cannot read property 'apply' of undefined. => https://www.screencast.com/t/KmoacEpuDb
The first tracker does not give this error, but the second one does. Does this mean that the anonymizeIP function is not applied for the second tracker. The script for the second tracker look like this, with the added a1. prefix to differentiate between them at code level:
_gaq.push (['a1._setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXX-YY']);
_gaq.push (['a1._gat._anonymizeIp']);
_gaq.push (['a1._trackPageview']);
Can I assume the anonymizeIP function doesn't allow prefixes?
Is there any GA Official around to take a look over this issue?
Thanks.
Arthur
I've implemented the anonymizeIP function and when debugging this implementation, I get the following error:
Called method "_anonymizeIp" threw exception.TypeError: Cannot read property 'apply' of undefined. => https://www.screencast.com/t/KmoacEpuDb
The first tracker does not give this error, but the second one does. Does this mean that the anonymizeIP function is not applied for the second tracker. The script for the second tracker look like this, with the added a1. prefix to differentiate between them at code level:
_gaq.push (['a1._setAccount', 'UA-XXXXXXX-YY']);
_gaq.push (['a1._gat._anonymizeIp']);
_gaq.push (['a1._trackPageview']);
Can I assume the anonymizeIP function doesn't allow prefixes?
Is there any GA Official around to take a look over this issue?
Thanks.
Arthur
Post has attachment
Hi Guys,
I want to narrow down some reports on Google Analytics, and for Custom Reporting I can't find the so called "Avg. Session Duration" variable neither in Metrics nor on Dimensions: http://screencast.com/t/ZHVVONorl
For normal Reporting, this "Avg. Session Duration" variable it's there by default.
Any help it's appreciated. Thanks.
I want to narrow down some reports on Google Analytics, and for Custom Reporting I can't find the so called "Avg. Session Duration" variable neither in Metrics nor on Dimensions: http://screencast.com/t/ZHVVONorl
For normal Reporting, this "Avg. Session Duration" variable it's there by default.
Any help it's appreciated. Thanks.
Post has shared content
Filtering by use case in the Structured Data Testing Tool
A quick note that the current version of the Google's Structured Data Testing Tool has a feature that's easy to overlook: the "Filter by use case" drop-down that appears a the top of the results pane after validating a page or chunk of code.
This is important to note as - as per the featured image - by default the Tool reports errors for all data. So overlooking the use case selector may lead to the mistaken impression that the code is invalid, when in fact it may be valid for the specific use case you have in mind.
#structureddatatestingtool #schemaorg #structureddata
A quick note that the current version of the Google's Structured Data Testing Tool has a feature that's easy to overlook: the "Filter by use case" drop-down that appears a the top of the results pane after validating a page or chunk of code.
This is important to note as - as per the featured image - by default the Tool reports errors for all data. So overlooking the use case selector may lead to the mistaken impression that the code is invalid, when in fact it may be valid for the specific use case you have in mind.
#structureddatatestingtool #schemaorg #structureddata

Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded





