Niles's interests

Niles's posts

Post has shared content

Public

This thing is amazing!ď»ż

**CIA Planimeter**

via +Vicky Veritas

Surprisingly, it's possible to physically compute the area of an arbitrary two-dimensional shape, like a country on a map, simply by carefully tracing its perimeter with a suitable measuring instrument called a

**Planimeter**.

The mathematics of the planimeter is supported by Green's Theorem named for the British Mathematical Physicist, George Green, whose other work underpinned the developments of James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson by providing a mathematical model of electricity and magnetism.

Paul Kunkel says...

*When I first used a planimeter, I was somewhat troubled by the fact that I did not understand how it worked. Oh sure, I don't understand how my car works either, but the planimeter essentially has only three moving parts. That makes its mechanism considerably less complex than a typical doorknob. After eighteen years of sleepless nights, I decided to buy a planimeter and figure it out.*

đź“–đź–Ľ

**More here:**https://goo.gl/QaHZpB

**Green's Theorem (Wikip):**https://goo.gl/rO6T1z

**George Green (Wikip):**https://goo.gl/NSW3zZ

*There are several kinds of planimeters, but all operate in a similar way. The precise way in which they are constructed varies, with the main types of mechanical planimeter being polar, linear and Prytz or "hatchet" planimeters. The Swiss mathematician Jakob Amsler-Laffon built the first modern planimeter in 1854, the concept having been pioneered by Johann Martin Hermann in 1814. Many developments followed Amsler's famous planimeter, including electronic versions.*

đź“–đź–Ľđź”—

**Planimeter (Wikip):**https://goo.gl/p4FxMl

Image: https://goo.gl/DzjZqF from https://goo.gl/R7Gk0w from https://goo.gl/dgJr8P

**Rolling Disc Planimeter**

*Cartographers used this German-made device to accurately measure the size of an area on a map or plan by tracing the areaâ€™s outline. The area calculation used the resulting dial reading.*

ď»ż

Post has shared content

Public

Another great article from +Quanta Magazine. This one includes such gems as

and

[1] http://www.math.columbia.edu/~abouzaid/ď»ż

**In mathematics, it takes a community to read a paper.**and

**... when you have a new subject, itâ€™s difficult to figure out what is easy to see.**(quoting Mohammed Abouzaid [1])[1] http://www.math.columbia.edu/~abouzaid/ď»ż

The early days of symplectic geometry â€” a field that begins with the movement of particles in space â€” were a bit like the start of a gold rush. But now that mathematicians have picked all its low-hanging fruits, they are left facing the shaky foundations.ď»ż

Post has attachment

Public

My plans for tomorrow, partly to support the march, but mostly because I want my son to see it.

https://actionnetwork.org/events/ross-county-ohio-womens-sister-marchď»ż

https://actionnetwork.org/events/ross-county-ohio-womens-sister-marchď»ż

Post has shared content

Public

Indeed, this article was a lot more useful than I expected it to be. Time well-spent.ď»ż

The long-read article below by the incomparable +Francis SuÂ makes a lot of wonderful and inspiring points, but hits out early with (among other things) a warning:

...

https://mathyawp.wordpress.com/2017/01/08/mathematics-for-human-flourishing/

I think it should be required reading for anyone learning mathematics, and anyone teaching mathematics. And a strong recommendation for most other people.

Via +David ButlerÂ on Twitterď»ż

...

*we hear voices in the public sphere saying: â€śhigh school students donâ€™t need geometryâ€ť or â€śletâ€™s leave advanced math for the mathematiciansâ€ť. And some mathematicians wonâ€™t admit it but they signal the exact same thing by refusing to teach lower-level math courses, or viewing the math major as a means to weed out those they donâ€™t think are fit for graduate school.*https://mathyawp.wordpress.com/2017/01/08/mathematics-for-human-flourishing/

I think it should be required reading for anyone learning mathematics, and anyone teaching mathematics. And a strong recommendation for most other people.

Via +David ButlerÂ on Twitterď»ż

Post has shared content

Public

**Netflix Knows....**

A fun psychological study about the power of visuals within your marketing. This is why you need a smart image.

#socialmediapsychology Â #visualmarketing Â ď»ż

Post has shared content

Public

Rollercoaster indeed!!ď»ż

A lot has gone wrong recently, but at least one thing that went wrong has now been reversed, so in a small way (but not at all small for complexity theorists) the world is a good place again ...ď»ż

Post has shared content

Public

Ester Dalvit just released on YouTube a series of videos about knots in 4D. A realization of high quality and excellent explanations.ď»ż

Post has attachment

Public

**What does 2017 look like?**Here's a picture of the curve x^2 + y^4 = 2017, with the point (44,3) marked.

By the way, if you don't already know where people are getting these bizarre number facts, the OEIS is a good place to start. It's my first resource for number facts!

http://oeis.org/search?q=2017ď»ż

Post has shared content

Public

I've wondered for a year or so why no statistician has published a gun death forecast. Morbid work to be sure, but potentially useful.

This article doesn't address that question, but it makes a couple of related observations.ď»ż

This article doesn't address that question, but it makes a couple of related observations.ď»ż

The reasons we donâ€™t study gun violence the same way we study infections

http://wapo.st/2j0RaA4ď»ż

http://wapo.st/2j0RaA4ď»ż

Post has attachment

Public

There's a new prime! (At least, newly known.) Here's what you need to know:

1. It's not the largest known, but it's number 7 on the list [2].

2. It's

3. It was found using PrimeGrid (and I think some other software too); this is the largest prime found by PrimeGrid so far.

4. It's a number of the form k*2^n + 1, for k = 10223; this proves that 10223 is

See the article for more :)

[1] https://www.newscientist.com/article/2113283-crowdsourced-prime-number-could-help-solve-a-50-year-old-problem/

[2] https://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=3

ď»ż

1. It's not the largest known, but it's number 7 on the list [2].

2. It's

**not**a Mersenne prime; it**wasn't**found by GIMPS.3. It was found using PrimeGrid (and I think some other software too); this is the largest prime found by PrimeGrid so far.

4. It's a number of the form k*2^n + 1, for k = 10223; this proves that 10223 is

**not**a Sierpinski number. This leaves 5 numbers left to check for the smallest Sierpinski number.See the article for more :)

[1] https://www.newscientist.com/article/2113283-crowdsourced-prime-number-could-help-solve-a-50-year-old-problem/

[2] https://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=3

ď»ż

Wait while more posts are being loaded