If You Accept Restrictions On Free Speech
[ From my major G+ collection Free Speech. First post to a forum.
I am the primary free speecher across this entire social platform. ]
If you accept any restrictions on free speech for any reason other than public safety, it only proves you received indoctrination and not real education.
Free speech is the whole ball game. Without real free speech there is no democracy, no critical thinking, no negotiation, no philosophy, and no western civilization.
Serious limitations on free speech are extremely damaging for society and only serve to develop major bad guy culture, such as National Socialism, Marxism-Leninism ( and Cultural Marxism ), and Political Islam.
These totalitarian approaches are what we must wholly oppose, and free speech is the fundamental approach for that highest priority work.
Free speech necessarily includes fundamental free speech rights for all bad guys, including National Socialists, Marxist-Leninists and Cultural Marxists, Islamists, and every other kind of anti-social jerk, sociopath, totalitarian, "hater" or bad actor in the public square.
There is in legal fact no reasonable or functional definition for the mythical 'hate speech'. Anyone can be offended.
So-called hate speech is in the ear of the offended person.
If you start banning all the hate speech of Eminem, then you have to ban music and free speech in general. You will have to police and criminalize free speech in general. And that is effectively the same thing as policing thought and criminalizing thought.
This totalitarian approach is more destructive than any one kind of 'hate speech'. It is no different than the Nazi book burnings of 1930s Germany or the continuing murders of journalists by Islamic fanatics.
Spill Ink Not Blood!
Nous Sommes Tous Charlie.
[ From my major G+ collection Free Speech. First post to a forum.
I am the primary free speecher across this entire social platform. ]
If you accept any restrictions on free speech for any reason other than public safety, it only proves you received indoctrination and not real education.
Free speech is the whole ball game. Without real free speech there is no democracy, no critical thinking, no negotiation, no philosophy, and no western civilization.
Serious limitations on free speech are extremely damaging for society and only serve to develop major bad guy culture, such as National Socialism, Marxism-Leninism ( and Cultural Marxism ), and Political Islam.
These totalitarian approaches are what we must wholly oppose, and free speech is the fundamental approach for that highest priority work.
Free speech necessarily includes fundamental free speech rights for all bad guys, including National Socialists, Marxist-Leninists and Cultural Marxists, Islamists, and every other kind of anti-social jerk, sociopath, totalitarian, "hater" or bad actor in the public square.
There is in legal fact no reasonable or functional definition for the mythical 'hate speech'. Anyone can be offended.
So-called hate speech is in the ear of the offended person.
If you start banning all the hate speech of Eminem, then you have to ban music and free speech in general. You will have to police and criminalize free speech in general. And that is effectively the same thing as policing thought and criminalizing thought.
This totalitarian approach is more destructive than any one kind of 'hate speech'. It is no different than the Nazi book burnings of 1930s Germany or the continuing murders of journalists by Islamic fanatics.
Spill Ink Not Blood!
Nous Sommes Tous Charlie.
View 14 previous comments
+ANDY LOL Silence, as in the Silent Majority" ruse?21h
+J. Ray Redden
Probably.
It's only brunch of papers, informatical inputs, there is nothing real.
Everything works until you believe are real thngs.
Something is happening inside the power, there is a fight, in this contest you should read the currently free speech question.
Paradoxly a censure speak more than the free speech itself if you look well, because free speech it's enviroment we like, but it's dispersive and you don't know easy where to see.
It's reason system don't like use censure, if they are using (and they are) they are really desperate.
After censure there is the physical oppression, so it's not good sign.20h
+wcangel my point was hitler and stalin and marx all used their free speech to subvert society. Destroy what was good leaving only a shell who like to talk a lot but have very little to say. ironically free speech is free speech's enemy. The quickest way to loose free speech is to give it to the wacko's and nut jobs who have no self control.17h
You are indoctrinated when you think free speech can be restricted for public safety.11h
+Sajid Bijapure go scream fire running from theater to theater in a large movie multiplex. See how far you get and tell me that's unreasonable.
That's not indoctrination because one can critically look at that situation and see that it's a form of speech that should be restricted.5h- The problem is understand who have to decide what is dangerous for public safety
In some way restricton of freedom of speech seem to me dangeorous for public safety, so only speak about the subject shoudl be forbidden
Is the same for the people speak of reduce number of people allow to vote, or they motivate reasons why they are agaist democracy, well, how can you say this in a tirannidy? only in democracy you can say these things (so, in the end, how can you really be agaist?)
It's not a complicate matter, the real problem is there are few people can take decision nowadays, it's a oligarchy too restrected, this is origin all the problems
The other is the conflict of interest, nobody is anymore indipendent, these oligarchy control everything
How can you trust these people don't use a restriction of free speech for make simple what they want?
This si the problem
Again it's question that people don't understand anymore the concept of philosophy applicate an historical concrete contest, they learn to think only in therm of theorical abstractions
It's really a disaster this2h
