Profile

Cover photo
Matthew Read
84 followers|18,608 views
AboutPosts

Stream

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
Last month, One Million Moms got their collective panties in a bunch when JCPenney published an ad featuring a family with two moms.

JCPenney responded this Sunday, on Father's day, by publishing an ad with two dads.

#awesome
2
1
Alex B's profile photo

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
Two truths: Eclipse sucks and you should put content on the left.
Koushik Dutta (Koush) originally shared:
 
Twitter's UI Redesign

My immediate reaction to the new twitter design was "wtf".

A few years ago I was reading an article about IDE design, and why Eclipse sucks [1]:

http://bryan.varnernet.com/files/eclipse_sucks_2.jpg

The criticism the author had for Eclipse is exactly what is wrong with the new Twitter redesign. To paraphrase, most languages read from left to right. So, our eyes are naturally drawn to the left. This is where your primary "content" should be. Instead of seeing the tweet history (which is what you want to see), you see the superfluous dashboard.

Having the primary content on the right can work if there is a sufficient border, or some sort of visual "break" for the eyes, but I don't feel there is a sufficient one. Note how Google+ has a huge margin along the left side of your feed.

Using a simple CSS hack to switch the order the panels are shown makes it immediately more appealing.

Compare:
Old/busted: http://download.clockworkmod.com/screenshots//Dock-20111211-122431.jpg
vs
Fixed: http://download.clockworkmod.com/screenshots//Dock-2-20111211-122532.jpg


Here's the fix you can apply in Stylish (a chrome extension) to change the twitter layout automatically:
http://download.clockworkmod.com/screenshots//Edit_Style_twitter-20111211-122823.jpg


[1] Here's the full article railing on Eclipse, for those interested: http://www.varnernet.com/~bryan/2005/08/18/eclipse-sucks/
1

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
Interesting take on it.
Lucian Randolph originally shared:
 
How is the game of Monopoly won?

Someone recently asked me why the "Occupy Wall Street" protesters were angry and what did the 99% mean? I thought about it for a minute and this was my answer.

Everyone is familiar with the board game, Monopoly. But to win the game, one player must collect all of the money from everyone in the entire game; bankrupting all of the other players in the process. Although it is a simple game to understand, it highlights one of the glaring defects in Capitalism. In any economic system, there is a finite amount of capital and it is shared among everyone in the economic system or society. If left unchecked, Capital Accumulation under the basic principles of Capitalism will always lead to a concentration of wealth in a small group and (by consequence) a drastic loss of wealth for all others. Which is why there must be rules.

In the real world, we are supposed to have laws, regulations and other mechanisms in place to prevent all of the capital from being recklessly accumulated in such small groups as to lead to a collapse of the entire economic system, which has actually happened before – in 1929. This type of government oversight is necessary because Capitalism at its very nature is not a "good" thing. It is, by definition, based on greed. You can only accumulate more of a finite substance, if someone else has less by comparison. As a component in a complete system of economics, Capitalism can have benefits if managed properly, fairly and wisely. However, Capitalism itself is not a "good" thing because even in a simple game simulation like Monopoly, the underlying goal of Capital Accumulation always displays typical human nature and therefore always leads to the same outcome. All for me… none for you.

Another fundamental lesson of economics that Monopoly teaches is that "money" is not something that you can "own." The group of players in the game agree that the money has value and then treat it accordingly. It's the same for real money. You can possess it, but its value is only because of the entire society that backs the money – and technically, the money "belongs" to the entire group. Unless you trade all of your money for gold or another commodity, then you don't really own your money. The value can be changed or deleted by the government or bank that issues the currency and you can't stop it. In any economic system, the amount of money and the value of the money are determined by the group of people that the economic system is based upon. All money is Monopoly money.

More to the point, the most important lesson that Monopoly teaches is something that every player over eleven years old knows to be true. The easiest way to win is to be the Bank… and to cheat.

When you are in control of the money, you have access and means to steal money. Then you have more capital to buy property or build apartments and make even more money. This is true in the real world as well. Part of the anger from the "Occupy Wall Street" movement is that the current financial rules are set up so that the Banks and Financial Industry (as well as virtually all Large Corporations) can essentially cheat. And just like in the game of Monopoly, a few people (the top 1%) are gathering enormous amounts of wealth at the expense of the vast majority (99%) of everyone else.

The reason this has happened is that we have been brainwashed to mentally equate Democracy and Capitalism. They are not the same. They are not even both required for each other to function individually. There is no voting in Monopoly and Democracies can quite easily be Socialist states. Capitalism is an economic system, not a political system of government. Capitalism does not care about Democracy or fairness or justice or law – only profit. It prefers to function unencumbered by any legislative or regulatory restrictions, but it will function and prosper under almost any set of circumstances because it is based on greed, a universal human desire. However, Capitalism ≠ Democracy. This is a lie that was created by the people who have been cheating at the game.

The reason we should not equate Democracy and Capitalism is that Democracy can be fundamentally manipulated by Capitalism if fair rules and safeguards are not put in place and strictly enforced. This is because Capitalism runs on money and Democracy runs on people – and everyone can be bought if the price is high enough. Ultimately this is the glaring defect in Democracy – it can be bought. When Democracy is for sale, rules are manipulated for financial gain. Nowhere is this more important or evident than in the current US financial sector. Because every kid over eleven knows that the easiest way to win in a Capitalism based game is to be the Bank… and to cheat. And that is exactly what has happened in our country. All of the money has been gathered by a small group and the rest of Americans are almost broke.

If this were Monopoly, the game would be over.





image credit: http://goo.gl/Gy5Qu

wikipedia notes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_accumulation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
3
2
Manoj Vijayasekar's profile photoXavier CHAMOISEAU (GoJiTa972)'s profile photo
In their circles
155 people
Have them in circles
84 people
Ovidiu Bledea's profile photo
Jingming Niu's profile photo
Anton Lopyrev's profile photo
Karl Reimer's profile photo
Rob Hicks's profile photo
Bob Wang's profile photo
Trevor Fairey's profile photo
Ben Morris's profile photo
Daniel Moniz's profile photo

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
Google knows exactly how bad the University of Guelph is ... http://bit.ly/roadToMordor (discovered this myself :P)
1
Christopher Elliott's profile photo
 
Set to walking directions. "Caution: One does not simply walk into Mordor".

Also: http://g.co/maps/zuah2

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
Nice.
Stack Exchange originally shared:
 
Animated gif of the day, via our designer +Jin Y. (The thumbnail looks...lonely. Click through for full enjoyment.)
1

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
Wow.
Koushik Dutta (Koush) originally shared:
 
Anyone remember that "When Animals Attack!" show? That was awesome.
1
1
Christopher Elliott's profile photoAnton Lopyrev's profile photo
 
If I had a buck for every time that happened to me..

Matthew Read

Shared publicly  - 
 
This is possibly the most incredible thing I've ever seen. Ultimate Batting Practice
4
3
Anton Lopyrev's profile photoPrabhdeep Gill's profile photoKevin Li's profile photoJohnny E.'s profile photo
2 comments
People
In their circles
155 people
Have them in circles
84 people
Ovidiu Bledea's profile photo
Jingming Niu's profile photo
Anton Lopyrev's profile photo
Karl Reimer's profile photo
Rob Hicks's profile photo
Bob Wang's profile photo
Trevor Fairey's profile photo
Ben Morris's profile photo
Daniel Moniz's profile photo