Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Dana Garrett
900 followers -
An unabashed misfit.
An unabashed misfit.

900 followers
About
Posts

Post has attachment
You get it, would be rapists? Nothing, no stimulus, justifies your actions. This photo teaches that nudity per se isn't an eroticizing act. The purpose of the display matters; and even if it's meant to be tantalizing, no permission to take or to suggest in response is warranted.
Photo
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Hey, Republicans, did the KKK go out of business?
Photo
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has attachment
An encapsulation of my social and political philosophy.
Photo

I am an atheist and materialist. As such I don't believe that we can speak referentially about poisited non material entities like souls and spirits. I do think we can speak referentially about the body and the mind even though I hold that the latter is just a function of the former. There are just certain activities, behaviors if you will, that can be meaningfully spoken of as within a mental domain. But I also believe we can speak referentially of the self, although what is referred to here is trickier and more elusive. By self I am referring to the sense (a sensibility) of the totality of who we are uniquely aggregated together. That sensibility is real even though it is the outcome of physical properties. Is that a fairly adequate and defensible understanding of the self? Why or why not?
Wait while more posts are being loaded