Shared publicly  - 
I'll be on The Kudlow Report on CNBC tonight talking about the 2nd Amendment.  Tune in 7p ET
Will James's profile photokevin brady's profile photoJohn Brown's profile photoCarol Roth's profile photo
I've been thinking about the "muskets" thing.
The intent of the second amendment was "A well regulated Militia" without the government supplying the arms. Doesn't that require the citizenry to be armed with the latest military hardware not hunting rifles?
(I'll have to miss you tonight, I'll be at church.)
The Constitutional Framers themselves thought the 2nd Amendment was a protection of the individual's inalienable right of self protection. Gun ownership is protected for the purpose to protect yourself, your family and property. If the one's who assault your family and you have sub-machine guns, then you need a bazooka and a tank! 
Add a comment...