Profile

Cover photo
Herb. Jones
Attended SFA
Lives in Bossier City Louisiana
145 followers|33,366 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideosReviews

Stream

Herb. Jones

General Discussion  - 
 
Freedom: Life; liberty; the pursuit of happiness.  We’ve heard those words so many times, lived with their blessing so many years; we can hardly remember how sweet freedom taste.  A new inalienable right:  To live our lives with as few people possible DICKING with us.  Still people are screaming at us every day.  Can’t we smell what’s cooking? 
1
Bert Powers's profile photo
 
We are all frogs in a pot.
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

Shared publicly  - 
 #TV
 
You can tell how old a person is by their first TV crush.  I'm so old, my first was Piney from Sky King.  Ever heard of that show?  What was yours?
1
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

Shameless promotion  - 
 
“MISCREANT MANAGEMENT 101”, this is the latest part of my great American novel.  In it: DK2 confronts a mass murderer and KC reviles some of her necromancer abilities.  Story available at http://snakestrip101.blogspot.com/
1
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

Shared publicly  - 
 
Not sure where this came from but I got Greek Feet if it's true.
1
2
Elizabeth Childs's profile photoHerb. Jones's profile photo
2 comments
 
I'm Greek
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones
moderator

Discussion  - 
 
 
I thin Tayback and Mark Henry would be a killer tag team.  What do you think?
1
Devin Seals's profile photo
 
Not to sure about that one .....ryback can lose focus from time to time and Henry is just unstable .they would just end up fighting each other there first match , but that's just me .
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
145 people
Damian Gadal's profile photo
Jonas MacMillian's profile photo
Nathan Vargas's profile photo
Alex P's profile photo
K. Rosemont's profile photo
Ash Cris's profile photo
Lochlann Doyle's profile photo
robert bevan's profile photo

Herb. Jones

General Discussion  - 
 
                                     DUELING DEFINITIONS

          The issues and policies that we debate every day are actually solutions to problems facing America.  We should spend more time defining those problems.  To show why that’s important, let’s look at the use of chemical weapons in Syria.  

          I believe it goes back to how you define the problem of 9-11.  If you accept the popular definition of:  “We were attacked by terrorist,” then the solution is apparent.  You go get the people who attacked you.

          On the other hand, if you define 9-11 as the failure of the government to protect its citizens, then your outlook changes.  At the time there was a list of things the government had failed to do.  On the list were: lack of support for our diplomatic corps; decimation of our military; walls between law enforcement and information gatherers; walls within the law enforcement agencies and within information agencies; and peace negotiations for the sake of peace negotiations only.  It was summed up as; “We didn’t know we were at war.”

          If you believe the problem of 9-11 was; “We were attacked by terrorist,” then you were probably confused when Bush attacked Iraq because Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.  You might think the concern over weapons of mass destruction was just an excuse for the attack.

          If you accept the definition of 9-11 as a failure of the government, you probably had no problem with taking action against Iraq.  The inability of our government to hold Hussein accountable for his invasion of Kuwait was probably the most obvious example of the failure of our diplomatic policies.  The existence of weapons of mass destruction was an irrelevant factor.  The reluctance to invade Iraq was due to concerns that America could not handle two wars at the same time.  

          With the popular view of  9-11 as just an attack, the killing of Bin Laden is viewed as end game; a final solution to 9-11.  The Arab Spring, Benghazi, the closure of our embassies and the use of chemicals in Syria are viewed as more problems that have cropped up.

          If we didn’t’t know we were at war before 9-11, are we sure killing Bin Laden ended the war?  Is the Arab Spring, Benghazi, the closure of our embassies and the use of chemicals in Syria acts of a defeated enemy, the emergence of a new force, or a counterattack in an ongoing campaign?  Does the present administration believe we are at war or have we returned to the old way of doing things that resulted in 9-11?  Is the use of chemicals in Syria just another day in the jungle or is it the natural results of Obama’s hands off policy in the Middle East?

          I’ll talk specifically about the use of chemicals in Syria in a moment, but first I want to go back to my central theme of defining problems.

          My goal here is not to wow people with how well I explain the issues. My goal is to present a simple process people can use to separate democrat thought from conservative thinking.   

          You see, I believe there is a real disconnect between the way liberals see America and the way conservatives see America.  The problem is that the democrats have managed to successfully define most of the problems facing America.  It’s really difficult to come up with solutions to problems that have all been defined by the democrats.

          This is what I want you to do.  Pick an issue: immigration; medical care; climate change; or whatever.  Then define the problem that the issue is trying to solve, first as the democrats have defined it and then as you would define it.  By comparing and contrasting the definitions I trust you will see a clear distention between conservative and liberals, not in an abstract philosophical way but in a real meat and potato way as in “What is the problem we are trying to fix anyway?”  The goal is not to show liberals and conservatives are different, we know that.
         
          The goal is to construct a simple way of showing the difference on each issue.  I am hoping someone will see the merits in this and explain it better than I have, because I feel it is important.

          In the 9-11 example I tried to show how solutions to problems are colored by how the problem is defined.  Here’s another example using the use of chemicals in Syria.

          The democrats seem to define the use of chemicals in Syria as an immoral, inhuman act that the perpetrators had been warned not to do.  In that case we should punish the perpetrators in order to reestablish a moral superiority and force the violators to act in a more humane way.  Recently democrats have suggested that if we do not react, sometime in the future, chemical weapons may become a threat to the USA.

          Before I give you my definition to the problem, here are some things you need to know about chemical and biological weapons.

ONE:  Chemical and bio weapons are really deadly.  One drop the size of a pin head will kill a person in less than three minutes.  That’s not, “They got me sarge.  Go on without me, it’s just a flesh wound.” It’s a real horrible and scary death in just a few minutes.

TWO:  For all its death dealing capacity, it is really a poor combat weapon.  Most modern militaries have protective suits and procedures for decontamination.  So use of chemicals would mostly just slow down an advancing army.

THREE:  The best use of chemicals is against an unprotected civilian population.  This causes mass confusion, breaks the will of the people to fight or other physiological reasons.  

FOUR:  Instead of using chemical weapons, it is better to threaten or imply the use of chemicals.  This is what Iraq did in first gulf war when they launched missiles into Israel that could carry chemicals but did not.  It got almost as big a reaction as the actual use of chemicals would.  The reason for the reluctance to use chemicals it this theory: if a group uses chemicals brazenly and recklessly then the world would rise up against the violators.  Up until now it seems the use of chemicals against a country’s own people does not rise to a level that would cause the world to respond.

          So I would say the problem with the uses of chemicals in Syria is the potential loss of the deterrent against the reckless and brazen use of chemical weapons and the illusion the world will rise up against the use of chemical weapons.  In this case an overreaction would be as bad as a token reaction.  

          Here are some questions that need to be asked.  Should we have picked this use of chemical weapons to take a stand?  Should we just let it disappear in the red tape of government bureaucracy?  Because the use of chemical is often for a psychological purpose, are we being played for a larger purpose?

          This brings me back to your homework assignment.  Take an issue; define the problem it is trying to solve, first as the democrats defines it and second as you would define the problem.  Then compare and contrast.  If you can do that you will notice 5 things.

ONE:  There are two definitions to the problem, yours and the democrats.

TWO:  The most wildly accepted definition to the problem is the democrat definition.  Many times the republicans have failed to give any definition at all.

THREE:  The democrat solutions best resolve the problem as it is defined by the democrats.

FOUR:  The republican solutions do not solve the problem as the democrats have defined it.

FIVE:  The reverse is true as well.  The solutions the democrats purpose do nothing to resolve the problems as we have defined them.  In fact, most time their solutions actually aggravate the problem as we have defined it.

                               BUT WAIT THERE’S MORE

          If you act now, and define several problems you will start to see a secret thread that runs through all of the democrat’s definition.

          I think promoting our definitions to problems will help promote our solutions to the problems.  Even if I am dead wrong, you will end up with a better understanding of the issues that face America today.  So do your homework.  I dare you.

Ps.  If you Google techniques of problem solving and find a good site that explains how to define problems, you could apply the techniques in other areas such as helping you children to stand up against bullying.
1
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

Discussion  - 
 
Raylin hasn't killed as many people as marshall Dillon but he's still young.
5
Jon Beres's profile photo
 
Dillon had 20 (26 episode) seasons +Herb. Jones ...but your right - give him time
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

General Talk  - 
 
Aneyone remember this guy???
http//thefbcg.blogspot.com
1
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

Fantasy  - 
 
Although this is a fantasy, it probably stretches the definition of writing.  However, if you like wrestling you might enjoy it.  It is a fantasy wrestling event I wrote just for the fun of it.  Let me know if you like it.
1
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones

Discussion  - 
 
I don't know much about terrorist.  I know nothing about intercity street gangs.  I do know the characters in Justified.  In fact, I could be related to most of them.
3
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones
moderator

Discussion  - 
 
 
I think Wade Barrett would be a better "Baby" than a "Heel".  What do you think?
1
Add a comment...

Herb. Jones
moderator

Discussion  - 
 
 
When asked to pronounce Fandango's name correctly---  It's pronounced Johnny Curtis or maybe Rumpleforeskine.
1
Devin Seals's profile photo
 
Somebody will get it right before wrestlemaina .bet his match will be 2 hours in after the world title and tag match .
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
145 people
Damian Gadal's profile photo
Jonas MacMillian's profile photo
Nathan Vargas's profile photo
Alex P's profile photo
K. Rosemont's profile photo
Ash Cris's profile photo
Lochlann Doyle's profile photo
robert bevan's profile photo
Work
Occupation
Odd jobs. Military, Telemarketer, Casino dealer, real estate agent. Now completely retired and unashamed.
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Bossier City Louisiana
Previously
Center Texas. - Edwards AFB California - Alconbury RAF England - Wesbadan Hospital Germany. - Barksdal AFB Louisiana. - Suwon AFB, South Korea - Alconbury RAF England - Peterson AFB, Colorado Springs, Colorado - Kadena AFB, Okinawa Japan.
Links
Contributor to
Story
Tagline
Deep thoughts or too much time on my hands. You decide.
Bragging rights
Did nothing in particular, but did it well.
Education
  • SFA
    Theater and Speech
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Their burgers taste like burgers used to taste like, before burgers tasted like pre-fab mass produced burgers like they do now.
Food: GoodDecor: GoodService: Good
Public - a year ago
reviewed a year ago
1 review
Map
Map
Map