Rex May
56 followers -
Cartoonist, Paleocon, and Language tinkerer
Cartoonist, Paleocon, and Language tinkerer
56 followers
Communities and Collections
Posts
Post has attachment
Public
From
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-as-zen-master-v-run-amok-hillary.html
Trump as Zen Master, v. Run-Amok Hillary
The Democrats are saying the craziest goddam things lately, throwing all the mud they can find at Trump, hoping that some of it will stick. They really don't have a leg to stand on, because Hillary's past and personality are too well-known to be hidden. "You can fool all the people some of the time," etc. So they're mostly playing word-assiciation games, like:
Trump: "It's awfully hot out today."
NY Times headline: "Trump admits global warming, contradicts his previous statements."
Trump at restaurant: "I'll have a burger and fries... On second thought, I'll have the onion rings instead."
CNN Evening News: "Another serious flip-flop by Trump. Can this man be trusted with nuclear weapons?
And so forth.
The fact about Trump is that he's brilliant, savvy, very good at managing conflict and finding solutions, and, from all indications, an American patriot who thinks the American government should first serve the American people. We know his motivations, which are good, and there's zero evidence that he's unstable in any way. On the contrary, considering his lifetime activities, if he had any tendency to be unstable, it would have manifested many times since then.
To read the rest, click:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-as-zen-master-v-run-amok-hillary.html
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-as-zen-master-v-run-amok-hillary.html
Trump as Zen Master, v. Run-Amok Hillary
The Democrats are saying the craziest goddam things lately, throwing all the mud they can find at Trump, hoping that some of it will stick. They really don't have a leg to stand on, because Hillary's past and personality are too well-known to be hidden. "You can fool all the people some of the time," etc. So they're mostly playing word-assiciation games, like:
Trump: "It's awfully hot out today."
NY Times headline: "Trump admits global warming, contradicts his previous statements."
Trump at restaurant: "I'll have a burger and fries... On second thought, I'll have the onion rings instead."
CNN Evening News: "Another serious flip-flop by Trump. Can this man be trusted with nuclear weapons?
And so forth.
The fact about Trump is that he's brilliant, savvy, very good at managing conflict and finding solutions, and, from all indications, an American patriot who thinks the American government should first serve the American people. We know his motivations, which are good, and there's zero evidence that he's unstable in any way. On the contrary, considering his lifetime activities, if he had any tendency to be unstable, it would have manifested many times since then.
To read the rest, click:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-as-zen-master-v-run-amok-hillary.html
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
From:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/wisdom-from-lao-tze-and-bob-wallace.html
Wisdom from Lao Tze and Bob Wallace
Have you noticed something about obvious facts? Either they're not obvious any more, or the MAG (Media, Academia, Government) hates them so much that they insist that they're not facts.
For example, anybody who pays attention knows that all these young Black men who are getting shot are getting shot by other young Black men, and the phenomenon has nothing to do with Whites or White racism. This is an obvious fact, so the MAG suppresses it, and tries to get us to visualize instead crowds of clean-cut young Black men on their way to church being shot down by the cast of Hee-Haw.
It's also pretty obvious that if you bomb hell out of a country — Afghanistan, Syria, wherever — and then invite the survivors to immigrate to your country to live, you're going to have trouble. Again, this doesn't fit the narrative of the MAG that diversity is supercool, so they scream loudly to drown the fact out.
So don't assume that anything is obvious. Don't assume that it's obvious to anybody, especially the young, because they're constantly being taught obviously wrong things, like diversity is strength, disarming farmers in South Dakota will prevent homicides in South Side Chicago, and that America should be ruled by a crazy old lady and her loyal sidekick, Huma.
Read the whole thing here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/wisdom-from-lao-tze-and-bob-wallace.html
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/wisdom-from-lao-tze-and-bob-wallace.html
Wisdom from Lao Tze and Bob Wallace
Have you noticed something about obvious facts? Either they're not obvious any more, or the MAG (Media, Academia, Government) hates them so much that they insist that they're not facts.
For example, anybody who pays attention knows that all these young Black men who are getting shot are getting shot by other young Black men, and the phenomenon has nothing to do with Whites or White racism. This is an obvious fact, so the MAG suppresses it, and tries to get us to visualize instead crowds of clean-cut young Black men on their way to church being shot down by the cast of Hee-Haw.
It's also pretty obvious that if you bomb hell out of a country — Afghanistan, Syria, wherever — and then invite the survivors to immigrate to your country to live, you're going to have trouble. Again, this doesn't fit the narrative of the MAG that diversity is supercool, so they scream loudly to drown the fact out.
So don't assume that anything is obvious. Don't assume that it's obvious to anybody, especially the young, because they're constantly being taught obviously wrong things, like diversity is strength, disarming farmers in South Dakota will prevent homicides in South Side Chicago, and that America should be ruled by a crazy old lady and her loyal sidekick, Huma.
Read the whole thing here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/wisdom-from-lao-tze-and-bob-wallace.html
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
From:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/there-aint-no-such-thing-as-free-trade.html
There ain't no such thing as a free trade
Those of us who have been balanced between conservatism — mostly, alas, neoconservatism — and libertarianism are knee-jerk in favor of free trade. We've been marinated in it. And it's really not an either-or thing. Mostly, we don't want yard sales regulated, but concede the need for a little regulation here and there for other kinds of trade. Oddly, though, many of us do want standards and things for domestically-traded strawberries and cars, but want such things traded freely between countries with no standards at all — that's what 'free trade' means, after all, no standards, regulations, or fetters of any kind. And we've been trained, both by deep libertarian thinkers and neocon pimps to consider it a triumph when a head of lettuce costs a few cents less and to look the other way when the local factory closes.
Read the rest of this here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/there-aint-no-such-thing-as-free-trade.html
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/there-aint-no-such-thing-as-free-trade.html
There ain't no such thing as a free trade
Those of us who have been balanced between conservatism — mostly, alas, neoconservatism — and libertarianism are knee-jerk in favor of free trade. We've been marinated in it. And it's really not an either-or thing. Mostly, we don't want yard sales regulated, but concede the need for a little regulation here and there for other kinds of trade. Oddly, though, many of us do want standards and things for domestically-traded strawberries and cars, but want such things traded freely between countries with no standards at all — that's what 'free trade' means, after all, no standards, regulations, or fetters of any kind. And we've been trained, both by deep libertarian thinkers and neocon pimps to consider it a triumph when a head of lettuce costs a few cents less and to look the other way when the local factory closes.
Read the rest of this here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/there-aint-no-such-thing-as-free-trade.html
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
From:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-and-treason.html#comment-form
Now, if you've been around any time at all you're well aware that Democrats don't really give a flying whatever about treason or traitors. Most of them think Jane Fonda was heroic to sit on the communist Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun to have her picture taken. Commit an actual act of treason and you can count on their love and support.
So it's ludicrous for any of them, however stupid, to interpret Trump's sarcastic gag about the Russians trying to find Hillary's missing e-mails as some kind of treason. Of course he was referring to the fact that they already, allegedly, have them, because they already of course hacked them, so of course there's no way even an idiot could think he was asking them to hack something they'd already hacked. And what else was he "asking" the Russians to do? Right. Turn them over to the FBI. That might be treasonous in the medieval sense as being disloyal to the person of the Royal Hillary, but not even dubious in any real sense.
Read the whole thing here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-and-treason.html#comment-form
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-and-treason.html#comment-form
Now, if you've been around any time at all you're well aware that Democrats don't really give a flying whatever about treason or traitors. Most of them think Jane Fonda was heroic to sit on the communist Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun to have her picture taken. Commit an actual act of treason and you can count on their love and support.
So it's ludicrous for any of them, however stupid, to interpret Trump's sarcastic gag about the Russians trying to find Hillary's missing e-mails as some kind of treason. Of course he was referring to the fact that they already, allegedly, have them, because they already of course hacked them, so of course there's no way even an idiot could think he was asking them to hack something they'd already hacked. And what else was he "asking" the Russians to do? Right. Turn them over to the FBI. That might be treasonous in the medieval sense as being disloyal to the person of the Royal Hillary, but not even dubious in any real sense.
Read the whole thing here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-and-treason.html#comment-form
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
Hey, I'm back:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-again.html
Just had to go off and do more medical stuff — Took longer this time, but it should be held to a minimum in future. It just gets me away from the net so I can't do this good stuff.
One of the reasons I have to go do medical stuff is that I'm an old coot, and that's what old coots do. Here's an old coot to the left, in a graphic I made for your pleasure and use on such social forums as Facebook. I'm always a little surprised to hear the latter referred to as "social media," because I just use it for spreading propaganda around.
Have fun with it.
Read everything here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-again.html
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-again.html
Just had to go off and do more medical stuff — Took longer this time, but it should be held to a minimum in future. It just gets me away from the net so I can't do this good stuff.
One of the reasons I have to go do medical stuff is that I'm an old coot, and that's what old coots do. Here's an old coot to the left, in a graphic I made for your pleasure and use on such social forums as Facebook. I'm always a little surprised to hear the latter referred to as "social media," because I just use it for spreading propaganda around.
Have fun with it.
Read everything here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-again.html
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
From:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/it-is-honor-to-be-critiqued-by-vulture.html
It is an honor to be critiqued by the Vulture
It is indeed. I always learn a lot when the Vulture of Critique pedantically disagrees with me, and I encourage him to do so whenever he thinks it a necessity, or just an occasion for putting some knowledge out there. A teaching moment, if you will. His latest such critique seems to have been triggered (look! — I used a trendy word, but probably not in a PC way) by the cartoon here [link]. I rush to assure Vulture that the cartoon isn't an endorsement of Pinochet, a man of whom I know very little, but rather a send-up of the libertarian "non-aggression principle" dogma, which wouldn't work in a day-care center, let alone a planet full of contending religions and ideologies. The point of course is that such libertarian high-minded principles are totally useless in combatting any contending aggressive ideology, like communism, whereas a man like Pinochet, whatever his flaws, knows very well how to handle people like that.
But that's really a side issue. What Vulture mainly reacts to is this post [link], where I argue that fascism is a tool that came into being as a direct result of the communist threat. Yes, that's a gross oversimplification, but it has validity. And I pause here to point out the obvious, that most people the liberals and neocons call "fascists" are nothing of the kind. Fascists are defined as Mussolini and his followers and their ideology. Nobody can argue with that. Then, you can add those people and movements that explicitly consider themselves imitations of Mussolini's fascists, like the National Socialists in Germany, the British Union of Fascists, the Lapua Movement in Finland, Engelbert Dollfuß' austrofascists, the Iron Guard in Romania, and, most lately, George Lincoln Rockwell's American Nazi Party. More dubious is designating Franco's Falange movement as fascist, which is based more on his connection with the Axis than with his actual ideology, which has too much Christian sensibility in it to be truly fascist.
To read the whole thing, go here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/it-is-honor-to-be-critiqued-by-vulture.html
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/it-is-honor-to-be-critiqued-by-vulture.html
It is an honor to be critiqued by the Vulture
It is indeed. I always learn a lot when the Vulture of Critique pedantically disagrees with me, and I encourage him to do so whenever he thinks it a necessity, or just an occasion for putting some knowledge out there. A teaching moment, if you will. His latest such critique seems to have been triggered (look! — I used a trendy word, but probably not in a PC way) by the cartoon here [link]. I rush to assure Vulture that the cartoon isn't an endorsement of Pinochet, a man of whom I know very little, but rather a send-up of the libertarian "non-aggression principle" dogma, which wouldn't work in a day-care center, let alone a planet full of contending religions and ideologies. The point of course is that such libertarian high-minded principles are totally useless in combatting any contending aggressive ideology, like communism, whereas a man like Pinochet, whatever his flaws, knows very well how to handle people like that.
But that's really a side issue. What Vulture mainly reacts to is this post [link], where I argue that fascism is a tool that came into being as a direct result of the communist threat. Yes, that's a gross oversimplification, but it has validity. And I pause here to point out the obvious, that most people the liberals and neocons call "fascists" are nothing of the kind. Fascists are defined as Mussolini and his followers and their ideology. Nobody can argue with that. Then, you can add those people and movements that explicitly consider themselves imitations of Mussolini's fascists, like the National Socialists in Germany, the British Union of Fascists, the Lapua Movement in Finland, Engelbert Dollfuß' austrofascists, the Iron Guard in Romania, and, most lately, George Lincoln Rockwell's American Nazi Party. More dubious is designating Franco's Falange movement as fascist, which is based more on his connection with the Axis than with his actual ideology, which has too much Christian sensibility in it to be truly fascist.
To read the whole thing, go here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/it-is-honor-to-be-critiqued-by-vulture.html
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
From:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/hillary-for-looter-in-chief.html
Hillary for Looter-in-Chief
It's been pointed out by several people so far, but I'll reiterate:
1. Trump didn't ask, in reality or in jest, for Russia to hack for those e-mails. He asked for them to look to see if they already had them, and if so, to maybe share them with us.
2. It was a joke, in the usual Trump style, and all the Dems and liberals and newsclowns who pretend not to know that are totally disingenuous and hypocritical.
3. The joke depends on the fact that Hillary was criminally irresponsible in keeping the e-mails where they could be hacked. Something they don't mention.
4. If Hillary was telling the truth, and there was nothing classified on her e-mails, and they were about yoga classes and wedding planning, then asking Russia to look for them has to be a joke, since they are harmless.
5. If she was lying, the treason lies in her behavior, not in somebody joking about it.
Are we clear on all that now? Good.
Next. There is a Putin-Trump connection, but it lies solely in the fact that Putin is a patriotic leader who puts Russia's interests ahead of those of other nations, and is vigorous and firm about it, while Trump is a patriotic leader who intends, if elected, to put America's interests ahead of those of other nations. Two guys like that can find common ground and work for their own nations, and work together to serve the interests of both. Most obviously in this case in defeating ISIS, which both want to do.
Hillary, contrariwise, seems to want to pick a fight with Russia, and instead go it alone in the Middle East, using Muslim "allies" instead. This is true of a lot of liberals and Democrats, who have been blindly anti-Russian ever since Russia threw the communists out. It broke all the liberals' hearts, and they can't forgive Putin for presiding over an anti-communist Russia.
Speaking of that, if you'll remember, when the communists were thrown out, the Wall Street crowd moved in to loot Russia — you know, Soros and that gang — and after a little initial heroism, Yeltsin unfortunately cooperated with the looting.
Click to read the rrest:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/hillary-for-looter-in-chief.html
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/hillary-for-looter-in-chief.html
Hillary for Looter-in-Chief
It's been pointed out by several people so far, but I'll reiterate:
1. Trump didn't ask, in reality or in jest, for Russia to hack for those e-mails. He asked for them to look to see if they already had them, and if so, to maybe share them with us.
2. It was a joke, in the usual Trump style, and all the Dems and liberals and newsclowns who pretend not to know that are totally disingenuous and hypocritical.
3. The joke depends on the fact that Hillary was criminally irresponsible in keeping the e-mails where they could be hacked. Something they don't mention.
4. If Hillary was telling the truth, and there was nothing classified on her e-mails, and they were about yoga classes and wedding planning, then asking Russia to look for them has to be a joke, since they are harmless.
5. If she was lying, the treason lies in her behavior, not in somebody joking about it.
Are we clear on all that now? Good.
Next. There is a Putin-Trump connection, but it lies solely in the fact that Putin is a patriotic leader who puts Russia's interests ahead of those of other nations, and is vigorous and firm about it, while Trump is a patriotic leader who intends, if elected, to put America's interests ahead of those of other nations. Two guys like that can find common ground and work for their own nations, and work together to serve the interests of both. Most obviously in this case in defeating ISIS, which both want to do.
Hillary, contrariwise, seems to want to pick a fight with Russia, and instead go it alone in the Middle East, using Muslim "allies" instead. This is true of a lot of liberals and Democrats, who have been blindly anti-Russian ever since Russia threw the communists out. It broke all the liberals' hearts, and they can't forgive Putin for presiding over an anti-communist Russia.
Speaking of that, if you'll remember, when the communists were thrown out, the Wall Street crowd moved in to loot Russia — you know, Soros and that gang — and after a little initial heroism, Yeltsin unfortunately cooperated with the looting.
Click to read the rrest:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/hillary-for-looter-in-chief.html
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
From:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/weve-always-been-at-war-with-mideastia.html#comment-form
We've always been at war with Mideastia
Gad, is the left ever obnoxious and dishonest. They're calling Trump all the usual names that Democrats call Republicans, plus a few more they usually save for emergencies. And they do have an emergency developing. The Trumpslide cometh, and they know it. It wouldn't be nearly so inevitable if the Democrats hadn't felt morally obligated to nominate a crazy old lady instead of a viable candidate, and by that I don't mean poor old Bernie. I mean Jim Webb or Bob Kerrey or hell, Joe Manchin. They do have elected Democrats who are neither psychotic nor Marxists, believe it or not.
One of the most irresponsible lies they come up with is that Trump is some kind of a warmonger, which is even more irresponsible when they imply that in contrast to Trump, Democrats aren't warmongers. Democrats have been warmongers all my life and many years before, while Republicans have been comparatively reluctant to make war, at least until Dubya came along.
Read it all here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/weve-always-been-at-war-with-mideastia.html#comment-form
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/weve-always-been-at-war-with-mideastia.html#comment-form
We've always been at war with Mideastia
Gad, is the left ever obnoxious and dishonest. They're calling Trump all the usual names that Democrats call Republicans, plus a few more they usually save for emergencies. And they do have an emergency developing. The Trumpslide cometh, and they know it. It wouldn't be nearly so inevitable if the Democrats hadn't felt morally obligated to nominate a crazy old lady instead of a viable candidate, and by that I don't mean poor old Bernie. I mean Jim Webb or Bob Kerrey or hell, Joe Manchin. They do have elected Democrats who are neither psychotic nor Marxists, believe it or not.
One of the most irresponsible lies they come up with is that Trump is some kind of a warmonger, which is even more irresponsible when they imply that in contrast to Trump, Democrats aren't warmongers. Democrats have been warmongers all my life and many years before, while Republicans have been comparatively reluctant to make war, at least until Dubya came along.
Read it all here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/weve-always-been-at-war-with-mideastia.html#comment-form
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
Time for another Ex-Army blog digest. It's title, URL, and short description. Do pass this around. Thanks!
Nationalism, Tribalism, Familialism
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/nationalism-tribalism-familialism.html
The individualist-collectivist spectrum
Back Again
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-again.html
Back to blogging, what's wrong with Republicans, and libertarian nearsightedness.
A Defense of Libertarianism by Jeff Colonnesi
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-defense-of-libertarianism-by-jeff.html
Jeff makes the best case for libertarianism, warning not to be too impatient.
Stick-Figure Politics Again
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/stick-figure-politics-again.html
The nonaggression principle in silly comic book form.
Another SJW heard from
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/another-sjw-heard-from.html
Sorry, no real 'third way' — it's nationalism or globalism. Pick one.
Defining "Globalism"
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/defining-globalism.html
This year, you have a choice — Globalism or Trump
Fascism is a tool
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/fascism-is-tool.html
Fascism - a belief system or just a tool?
"Nationalism" is a GOOD word
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/nationalism-is-good-word.html
"America First" will trump globalism
More Cartoon/Politics Fun
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/more-cartoonpolitics-fun.html
Who else watches Fox News AND the Cartoon channel?
A Quick Post!
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-quick-post.html
This and that, plus an Elizabeth Warren musical number.
Geographical Self-Segregation
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/geographical-self-segregation.html
Why does everybody want to live next door to White people?
Just Wait Till Your Father Gets Home, or Inaugurat...
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/just-wait-till-your-father-gets-home-or.html
Trump as America's Dad
America And/Or Russia
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/america-andor-russia.html
America and Russia — the do-gooder nations
When is an Immigrant Not an Immigrant? — When he's...
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/when-is-immigrant-not-immigrant-when.html
"Immigrant" isn't the correct word at ALL!
The Dallas Massacre
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-dallas-massacre.html
Talking about guns to avoid talking about Hillary, and a classic Trosley cartoon.
A little more wacky feedback
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-little-more-wacky-feedback.html
A conversation with a disingenuous idiot on the net, the most common kind, I believe.
Elephant Hallucinations?
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/elephant-hallucinations.html
Can you spot the trick?
Feedback, I Get Feedback!
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/feedback-i-get-feedback.html
Another Ancient Greek conversation. Is libertarianism a globalist ideology? Should it be?
Understanding Trump
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/understanding-trump.html
Hillary as a psychotic Lisa Simpson, Trump as a pragmatic philosopher king.
Nationalism, Tribalism, Familialism
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/nationalism-tribalism-familialism.html
The individualist-collectivist spectrum
Back Again
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-again.html
Back to blogging, what's wrong with Republicans, and libertarian nearsightedness.
A Defense of Libertarianism by Jeff Colonnesi
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-defense-of-libertarianism-by-jeff.html
Jeff makes the best case for libertarianism, warning not to be too impatient.
Stick-Figure Politics Again
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/stick-figure-politics-again.html
The nonaggression principle in silly comic book form.
Another SJW heard from
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/another-sjw-heard-from.html
Sorry, no real 'third way' — it's nationalism or globalism. Pick one.
Defining "Globalism"
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/defining-globalism.html
This year, you have a choice — Globalism or Trump
Fascism is a tool
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/fascism-is-tool.html
Fascism - a belief system or just a tool?
"Nationalism" is a GOOD word
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/nationalism-is-good-word.html
"America First" will trump globalism
More Cartoon/Politics Fun
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/more-cartoonpolitics-fun.html
Who else watches Fox News AND the Cartoon channel?
A Quick Post!
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-quick-post.html
This and that, plus an Elizabeth Warren musical number.
Geographical Self-Segregation
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/geographical-self-segregation.html
Why does everybody want to live next door to White people?
Just Wait Till Your Father Gets Home, or Inaugurat...
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/just-wait-till-your-father-gets-home-or.html
Trump as America's Dad
America And/Or Russia
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/america-andor-russia.html
America and Russia — the do-gooder nations
When is an Immigrant Not an Immigrant? — When he's...
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/when-is-immigrant-not-immigrant-when.html
"Immigrant" isn't the correct word at ALL!
The Dallas Massacre
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-dallas-massacre.html
Talking about guns to avoid talking about Hillary, and a classic Trosley cartoon.
A little more wacky feedback
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-little-more-wacky-feedback.html
A conversation with a disingenuous idiot on the net, the most common kind, I believe.
Elephant Hallucinations?
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/elephant-hallucinations.html
Can you spot the trick?
Feedback, I Get Feedback!
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/feedback-i-get-feedback.html
Another Ancient Greek conversation. Is libertarianism a globalist ideology? Should it be?
Understanding Trump
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/understanding-trump.html
Hillary as a psychotic Lisa Simpson, Trump as a pragmatic philosopher king.
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
If only the world were made up of such stick figures. Politics would be so much more simple!
Original here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/stick-figure-politics-again.html
Original here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/07/stick-figure-politics-again.html
Stick-Figure Politics Again
ex-army.blogspot.com
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded