Home
Collections
Join Google+
Send Feedback
Help
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Maps Terms
©2015 Google
Search
  • My Account
  • Search
  • Maps
  • YouTube
  • Play
  • Gmail
  • Drive
  • Calendar
  • Google+
  • Translate
  • Photos
More
  • Shopping
  • Docs
  • Books
  • Blogger
  • Contacts
Even more from Google
Sign in
Sign in
Timothy Gowers's profile photo
Timothy Gowers
Public
Feb 27, 2012
Elsevier has withdrawn support for the Research Works Act.

http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/intro.cws_home/newmessagerwa
Elsevier
At Elsevier, we have always focused on serving the global research community and ensuring the best possible access to research publications and data. In recent weeks, our support for the Research Work...
+Elsevier
32 plus ones
32
19 comments
19
28 shares
28
Shared publicly•View activity
View 13 previous comments
  • Michael Nielsen's profile photo
    Michael Nielsen+2
    The bill itself has now been withdrawn by congressional sponsors Issa and Maloney: https://plus.google.com/107980702132412632948/posts/a4DzVk9n7fG (via +Alexander Howard )
    Feb 27, 2012
  • Toma Susi's profile photo
    Toma Susi+3
    I wonder: did Elsevier withdraw support knowing the bill was going to be pulled?
    Feb 27, 2012
  • John Baez's profile photo
    John Baez+1
    I believe Elsevier's withdrawal of support was coordinated with the bill being pulled - there's no way to tell which caused which, but we can see who they're giving money to, and it prominently includes Issa and Maloney, who initiated that bill:

    http://maplight.org/us-congress/contributions?sort=asc&order=Recipient&s=1&office_party=House,Democrat,Republican,Independent&election=2012&string=Elsevier&business_sector=any&business_industry=any&source=All

    So, we can assume they talk to each other!
    Feb 28, 2012
  • James Duncan's profile photo
    James Duncan+1
    +Toma Susi Almost certainly the other way round: their lobbyists got it introduced; their lobbyists pulled support; the bill instantly died. Almost like Issa and Maloney had been bought and paid for.
    Feb 28, 2012
  • Brian Glanz's profile photo
    Brian Glanz+1
    +John Baez +Toma Susi and everyone, Elsevier told +Open Science Federation directly, today that Elsevier had informed Issa and Maloney last week of their intent to withdraw i.e. yes, you could say there was coordination. Sorry we cannot link directly to comments; for more see my most recent under <https://plus.google.com/103703080789076472131/posts/jeXKgWgVdtL>.
    Feb 28, 2012
  • Toma Susi's profile photo
    Toma Susi+1
    Okay, thanks a lot +James Duncan and +Brian Glanz for the clarification. In any case it seems clear this was the direct result of the boycott, the first of many one hopes.
    Feb 28, 2012