How in philosophy one mind and one soul are accommodated in one brain, feelings versus logic.
View 13 previous comments
Not only philosophy, mind, body, brain, soul but everything accommodating in one persisting instant of constant change.13w
+Richard Andrews Some people started asking what is real and how we perceive reality and how do we know that what we perceive as real exists as we perceive it, and since nobody gave an answer to stop it, it grew and multiplied to inner, outer etc. If we are at the same wavelength, the external reality is REALLY as we perceive it, the same for all conscious beings, but creates different inner realities, because of different qualities of sensing organs and build up experiences that analyze them.
Do you think that in phylosophy, what is called sense of inner or external reality determines, defines, explains soul and mind, that is, feelings/emotions and logic/reason, as being two separate working conditions of the brain's matter/material of the person. I think that emotions or logical thoughts may originate from anywhere from anything and if they are thought of as being one or two has no consequences to the need to separate emotions and reasoning. My humble opinion and wondering is, if in the search for true substance of "what affects our general view of the world in which our lifes are cast, (which affects philosophy too)" forces philosophy to look at science's side to extend its guidance to people's lifes, as it used to be.
Off course I can't do this and I'm wondering if some are working to define, for example, the mind in philosophy's manner but at least using the term neuron without becoming biology.
One link but for no special reason,I'm sure it's known stuff. encyclopedia.com - Internal Reality/External Reality - Dictionary definition of Internal Reality/External Reality | Encyclopedia.com: FREE online dictionary
P.S. " But what we do mentally seems fundamentally different and independent from physical reality." If this is true can always be at a state of wellbeing.13w
+THEMISTOKLES PAPPALAS I do not buy the idea that there is a single physical reality. The idea of inner and outer realities seems more like an attempt to explain why my reality and your reality are different. Reality is what each individual makes of it. Science fails simply because they do not accept this.
There seems to be some idea floating around that we need science for guidance in our lives. Why? Guidance for what? Do you actually think that science actually knows that much? A funny side about physical reality is that before you finish studying it it will have changed and what you studied is no longer.13w
the origin our way of thinling is very ancient
during renaiscencess was invected the first real way of doing science
it's not case you have symbols, heroes and martyrs here, system need for symbolic reasons
you have here paradigmas very important to get
one important step was thinking in abstraction terms
there is no reason to considerate a stone like an abstraction, it's only a method to make possbile create prespective you search same rule or behavior for all the stones instead to considerate the stone as a singolar identities different each others
there is a dignity and a meaning continued to considerate the stone as singolar identity with a connection you take care to considerate real with the subject insetad to make all possbile thing for forgetting we have a relationship with the object
in any case western took this prespective and it's reason its incredible success in progress and science
renaiscencess it's exception in history like the existence of the middle class, really an exception hard to explain without think it's simple destiny and random factors
you lost something about reality using this method, more efficient don't mean more real, more truth or whatelse
more efficient mean only more efficient
future is exit this absolutim and origin myth prespective, dream and legend about
recently i followed some medical discussion about vaccinations
we recently get mandatory vaccination children, it was almost forbidden for doctors speak if they think is not necessary or have some different opinions
these doctors got some problems with justice to speak about they dont' agree wth these vaccinations
now, i followed some discussion and what i get of the question is they are not totally agaist vacinnation, they are against indiscriminate vaccinations in the same moments (because tollerance limits are get with singolar somministration and not get in the field of multiple somministrations) and without a personal checkup and customization of the vaccination, etc..
they have some documentations and international research about to show in the discussions
i think there is something not sound so bad to follow in their idea about costimization of vaccination isteand indiscriminare vaccination wirthout study well the children tollerance before
the idea is again you have abstraction about everything and its forbidden personal connection and feeling
but you need to compensate with a personal costomization of cure looking to the medical history fo the patience, the personal characteristics, etc..
it don't sound to me absurd, it sound really credible
and this i think is the future of science or philosophy or whatelse
open mind about other prespectives, exist loop they are inside
i think is worng prespective think everything change instead science evolve
you proably need also science change a bit and get help other disciplnes to think about itself13w- All these invisible boundaries of bullshit.
Compartmentalize like it's a need.
Buerocracy complexity, baffle them into conforming.
Obey the strict boundaries where science ends and philosophy begins.
Join a team, cheer for your team sneer at the other.
It's all really nonsense there are no actual boundaries.
Just the belief that the make-believe boundaries exist.
Serious belief does not laugh at the ridiculousness.13w - +george linker Why you consider what you're saying "Reality is what each individual makes of it. Science fails simply because they do not accept this." different than what I wrote a few lines above: "If we are at the same wavelength, the external reality is REALLY as we perceive it, the same for all conscious beings, but creates different inner realities, because of different qualities of sensing organs and build up experiences that analyze them."13w
