Profile

Cover photo
The Objective Standard
140 followers|66,580 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
Who is reading our articles? People of all ages and walks of life are—but, most importantly, we are reaching college students and young adults.

In one form or another (via subscription or periodical index), The Objective Standard is in more than 800 college libraries, including Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, Yale, and many other top universities. The journal is on more than 700 newsstands across North America, including Barnes & Noble, Chapters-Indigo, and various smaller outlets. Our social media pages have more than 56,000 followers, who regularly read and share our posts and links. And our website now draws more than 63,000 unique visitors per month—that’s a 30 percent increase over our website traffic a year ago.

What do readers get from our articles? Here are a few unsolicited indications:

“TOS’s articles are clear as water, well structured, and very, very deep. You are giving us intellectual tools to fight the battle for freedom. Please know that you are helping readers all around the world.” —Eduardo M.

“The Objective Standard is a fountain of clarity in an otherwise murky world.” —Martin S.

“Your article ‘Capitalism and the Moral High Ground’ was a life-changing read for me. Thanks so much!” —Lok S.

“The Objective Standard represents the best of Objectivism: an undiluted commitment to reason, communicated with a rational temper and benevolence.” —Carl H.

“What a thrill to read clear integrations of Objectivism with all of the subjects I love from History to Education to Physics. The Objective Standard is the finest Objectivist periodical since the Ayn Rand Letter both in range and in clarity.” —Tom R.

“Outstanding. I’ve shared [‘Ten Steps to End Jihad Against the West’] on my own timeline, and those of about 10 relevant groups to which I belong, with the recommendation that readers share it further.” —Mark W.

“I recommend The Standard to anyone even slightly interested. It has the power to change lives. I especially recommend it to young people.” —Becky M.

“While all of the articles help me to integrate Objectivism into my life, most recently my wife and I found ‘How to Raise a Life-Loving Child’ exceptionally helpful. While we often know what is best for our two-year-old daughter, sometimes the best course isn’t so clear. I love the ‘the master question’ as a tool for achieving this purpose.” —Dan B.

“Thank you so much for the article ‘Libertarianism vs. Radical Capitalism’! I have been a fan of Ayn Rand’s work since first reading The Fountainhead in my AP English class 12 years ago. Since then, I have been reading more and more of her work and seeking those who appreciate similar ideas. This article has helped me focus my personal studies and understand how best to promote these important ideas. I truly understand now why our battle is not political in nature, but moral. Education is key!” —Tarsha W.

We receive such feedback regularly. The Objective Standard is reaching and moving minds.

But, like many intellectual journals and magazines, TOS’s sales revenues do not cover its expenses. In order to continue our work, we need help from supporters who see the value of what we do. Just as National Review relies on donations from conservatives, just as Democracy Journal relies on donations from socialists, and just as Reason magazine relies on donations from libertarians—so too The Objective Standard relies on contributions from people like you, who see the importance of a publication that elucidates and applies the principles of Objectivism.

Please contribute as generously as you can today. If you’ve already made a contribution in 2015, please consider making an additional year-end donation. Your support will help us reach and move even more minds in 2016.

Contribute Now » http://bit.ly/1mqkIbu
As The Objective Standard wraps up its tenth year of operations, I’m writing to ask for your help in fighting for your values.
1
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
“Degrade and destroy: Choose one. If you’re merely degrading a terrorist group, you have probably yet to determine how to destroy it. If you’re destroying the group, there’s no reason to degrade it. Why not just say you want to vanquish your enemy? That way, it’s not a multiple-choice quiz. . . .

“New threat: Unless you’re a high school freshman right now, none of this is new. We’ve been at war with this radical ideology since Sept. 11, 2001. And that’s ignoring the first World Trade Center bombing (1993), Khobar Towers (1996) and the USS Cole (2000), to name a few. Don’t forget the Iranian revolution (1979), the Beirut embassy bombing (1983) and the Salman Rushdie affair (1989). Sure, the Islamic State is a new terror group, but it’s got a very familiar beard. . . .
“War on terror: A holdover from the George W. Bush presidency, this term may be the worst of them all. Terrorism is a tactic. It’s not an enemy or an ideology. This is akin to declaring war on strafing or sniping. Little wonder we haven’t won the war yet. We might want to make sure we know whom we’re fighting before we devise a strategy on how to win. . . .” —Jonathan Schnauzer
Continue reading » http://bit.ly/1lQksmD
Jonathan Schnauzer's New York Post article analyzes conceptual contortions used to evade truths about Islamic jihad.
3
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
If you’re looking for wonderful Christmas gifts for kids aged two to eight years old, check out Daniel Wahl’s article, “A Dozen Great Books for Young Children,” in the Fall issue of TOS.

Wahl takes a delightful stroll through some of the best children’s books in print (and a few out of print) and, along the way, indicates the nature and value of each. He also provides a link to each book at Amazon.com, which, in most cases can deliver the book in a jiffy.

If you need gifts for young children or know anyone who does, Wahl’s article is a gold mine.
If you need great Christmas gifts for young kids, this is a gold mine.
1
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
“We are engaged fundamentally in an ‘ideological war,’ says Syed, and we ‘can’t win it without a war of ideas, without actually pushing back against the ideas and where they’re coming from.’ We need to encourage nominal Muslims—those who do not genuinely embrace Islam and who may be open to reason—to engage in a ‘critical examination’ of the religion. This is what lead Syed himself to repudiate Islam. ‘The reason I left the religion was because I spent a year studying [it] because I wanted to be a better Muslim,’ Syed explains. ‘And when I studied . . . it was very obvious that this is mythology.’”
Muhammad Syed discusses the nature of Islam and how to fight the cultural aspect of the war against this murderous creed.
3
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
"Given the myriad easily accessible facts and logical explanations showing over and over again that capitalism is the social system of human flourishing, there simply is no way today for a professional intellectual concerned with economics not to understand this truth at least to a substantial extent.

"Why then does Pope Francis insist that capitalism is 'the dung of the devil' and that we must eliminate or at least sharply curtail this wretched thing?

"The Pope sees fit to make such claims because religion—whether Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism, or Islam—is, in principle, opposed to the very things that capitalism legalizes and venerates—most notably, in this context, the selfish pursuit of profit and the right to keep and use the product of one’s effort." —Craig Biddle 
Pope Francis rails against capitalism; some religionists hopelessly attempt to defend it; Ayn Rand shows how to defend it properly.
1
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
"Just as those who support the Iran 'deal' are guilty of materially aiding the Iranian regime, so too those who support the notion that faith is a means of knowledge are guilty of spiritually aiding that regime. One form of aid amounts to political treason, the other to epistemological treason. And while the former may (in a sense) be more direct, the latter is more fundamental." —Craig Biddle 
Just as supporting the Iran "deal" materially aids jihadists, so too treating faith as a means of knowledge spiritually aids jihadists.
2
1
Add a comment...
In their circles
30 people
Have them in circles
140 people
Lynn Wdowiak's profile photo
Erica Schulz's profile photo
Matt Domerofski's profile photo
Christian skeptic's profile photo
ABHILASH PATRO's profile photo
Jacob Ord's profile photo
Corey Graham's profile photo
Patrick Roos's profile photo
JohnPaul Gettelman's profile photo

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
"All three gems, though written for different ages, share a similar outlook on life. In a note to readers on her website, Cynthia Rylant sums up that outlook, saying, 'it is really a beautiful world. It is a world worth writing about. We go through many changes in our lives, and some of them are hard. But the sky still has stars at night, the moon still shines. The world does not leave us empty-handed.' Nor, I might add, does Cynthia Rylant.

"With these three books, the world is an even better, more beautiful place. Put them in the hands of young children everywhere." —Daniel Wahl
Daniel Wahl reviews three books by children's author Cynthia Rylant.
1
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
From the pogroms to the Holocaust to the ongoing attacks by Arabs, Palestinians, and Muslims today, Jewish people have been oppressed, persecuted, and murdered for being Jewish. Whether regarded as members of a race, a religion, or a culture, Jews have been subject to a kind and degree of vitriol and violence unmatched by any other group in history. Yet, despite the relentless assaults against them, Jews have managed to survive and even to thrive.

One of the ways in which Jews have persisted against all odds is by establishing and maintaining the state of Israel, which was founded in 1948, three years after the Holocaust. Whatever the other justifications for its founding, Israel was to be a home and a safe haven for Jews: a nation in which they could live, think, produce, and prosper.

And Israel became just that.

THE VIRTUE OF ISRAEL

The Israelis converted deserts and swamps into centers for science, technology, engineering, and agriculture. They created desalination and water purification systems, pharmaceutical plants, biomedical devices and therapies, and myriad other life-serving values. In so doing, the Israelis raised the standard of living not only for themselves, but also for virtually everyone on the planet. From flash drives to pill cameras to bacteria-resistant textiles to cherry tomatoes, Israelis have rained life-serving values on the world.

How have Israelis done this? Most fundamentally, they’ve done it by means of reason—by observing reality, conceptualizing their observations, hypothesizing, experimenting, and employing the principles of logic. And what has made their exercise of reason possible? Israelis have been able to think rationally and act accordingly because they have established and maintained a government and a legal system dedicated substantially to the protection of individual rights.

Although Israel is not perfect in this respect (no country today is), its government protects its citizens’ and residents’ rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Israel is a parliamentary republic with elected officials; an independent judiciary; freedom of conscience and speech; and equality before the law for all people, regardless of race, religion, philosophy, gender, or sexual orientation. In these respects, relative to other countries in the Middle East, Israel is a beacon of reason, freedom, and civility.

And Israel’s respect for individual rights is no accident. The aim of protecting rights was built into the very fabric of the state from its beginning. Israel’s founding document, its Declaration of Independence, articulates this purpose explicitly:

“THE STATE OF ISRAEL . . . will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions. . . .

“WE APPEAL . . . to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions.”

Such principles and aims were set forth not only in Israel’s

Declaration of Independence, but also in speeches by its primary founder and first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion. In Israel, Ben-Gurion explained, “there will be non-Jews as well [as Jews]—and all of them will be equal citizens; equal in everything without any exception; that is: the state will be their state as well. . . . The attitude of the Jewish State to its Arab citizens will be an important factor—though not the only one—in building good neighborly relations with the Arab States. If the Arab citizen will feel at home in our state, and if his status will not be in the least different from that of the Jew, and perhaps better than the status of the Arab in an Arab state, and if the state will help him in a truthful and dedicated way to reach the economic, social, and cultural level of the Jewish community, then Arab distrust will accordingly subside and a bridge to a Semitic, Jewish–Arab alliance, will be built.”

Such are the basic ideas on which Israel was founded. Although collectivist and socialist elements were present in Israel’s system from the start (and still are today), the state was founded most fundamentally on the idea that the government is to “ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants.”

Since its founding, Israel has further codified these ideas in its laws and policies. This is why not only Jews and men, but also Arabs, Muslims, Christians, atheists, and women are free to think, to speak their minds, to pursue their values, to start businesses, to vote in elections, and to run for political office. Whatever its imperfections, Israel is essentially a rights-respecting nation.

If the protection of individual rights is the moral purpose of government (and it is)—if the requirements of human life constitute the standard of moral value (they do)—and if the use of reason to live and prosper is the essence of moral virtue (it is), then Israel is a morally good nation.

This is a large part of the reason that Arab and Muslim states and jihadist groups relentlessly attack Israel—just as it is the primary reason they attack America and Western nations in general. But, in the case of Israel, an additional motive is driving their aggression: Israel was founded by Jews as a safe haven for Jews—and Arabs and Muslims (by and large) harbor a special hatred for Jews. Why this is so is a subject for another day. But, as we will see, hatred of Jews—including eagerness to murder them—is rampant among Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East and northern Africa. And it is a fundamental motivating factor in their aggression against Israel.

A BRIEF RECOUNTING OF ARAB AND MUSLIM AGGRESSION AGAINST ISRAEL

On May 14, 1948, the British mandate over Palestine expired; the United Nations partition plan, which divided Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state, went into effect; and Israel declared its independence. The next day, five surrounding Arab and Muslim states—Egypt, Transjordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq—attacked Israel from the south, the east, and the north in a concerted effort to destroy the nation and kill its Jewish population.

In the ensuing nineteen-month war, 6,373 Israelis—1 percent of the Israeli population at the time—died fighting for their lives and their independence. Even so, Israel won the war, and the Israelis began the process of building their rights-respecting nation as planned.
But the Arab and Muslim states in the region regarded this as unacceptable. The “problem” was, as they would announce repeatedly in the decades to come: Israel still existed.
Israel and the Jews, according to these Arab and Muslim aggressors, must be destroyed. As King Saud of Saudi Arabia put it in 1954: “Israel to the Arab world is like a cancer to the human body, and the only way of remedy is to uproot it, just like a cancer.” Given Israel’s recently demonstrated military capabilities, this could prove difficult and costly. But no matter, said King Saud: “The Arab nations should sacrifice up to 10 million of their 50 million people, if necessary, to wipe out Israel.”

Egyptian Minister of State Anwar Sadat agreed and explained the origin of the jihad against the Jews: “Our war against the Jews is an old battle which Mohammed began . . . it is our duty to fight the Jews in the name of Allah and in the name of our religion, and it is our duty to finish the war which Mohammed began.”

During the 1950s and 1960s, Arab and Muslim terrorists—supported by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and other Arab and Muslim nations—regularly attacked and murdered Israelis, who retaliated but insufficiently to end the assault.

In 1959, anti-Israeli forces formed Fatah (named after a chapter in the Koran, meaning “Conquest”), whose central purpose was to engage in guerrilla warfare toward the destruction of Israel and “liberation” of Palestine. In 1964, kindred forces formed the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), whose stated goal was the destruction of Israel via “holy war (al-jihad) until complete and final victory has been attained.”

During the next few years, Arab and Muslim nations, along with Fatah and the PLO, amassed weapons, trained soldiers, and looked forward to the day they could overrun Israel and kill the Jews. In 1967, they felt they were ready. “The existence of Israel is an error which must be rectified,” said Iraqi President Abdul Rahman Arif, in May of that year. “This is our opportunity to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us since 1948. Our goal is clear—to wipe Israel off the face of the map.” Syrian Defense Minister Hafez al-Assad declared, “Our forces are now entirely ready not only to repulse the aggression, but to initiate the act of liberation itself, and to explode the Zionist presence in the Arab homeland. . . . the time has come to enter into a battle of annihilation.”…

Continue reading via PDF or subscription » http://bit.ly/1OpbYt3
Surveys the history of the Arab and Muslim assault on Israel, presents the secular case for Israel’s right to exist, and advocates a one-state solution.
3
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
"The black men who led slave rebellions in early America understood the principles of individual rights and liberty as well as did the abolitionists among the Founding Fathers, and perhaps more clearly than did the great and brilliant, but morally inconsistent, Virginians. Were it not for the intellectually and morally inconsequential detail of their skin color, these black freedom fighters could have been among the Founders and/or leaders of the American Republic. They should be remembered in that vein." —Andrew Bernstein 
Examines slave rebellions in early America, showing that those who led them did so for the same reasons the Founders revolted against Great Britain.
1
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
"The fundamental lesson to be learned from the continuing decline of America’s economic status is not economic but moral. We cannot support the economics of self-interest (capitalism) with the ethics of self-sacrifice (altruism). Freedom depends on egoism." —Craig Biddle 
The fundamental lesson to be learned from America’s declining economic liberty is not economic but moral: Freedom depends on egoism.
2
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
“A key value of the Master Question is that it incorporates certain principles of the Objectivist metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics into a single, mind-activating tool that guides parents’ thinking and decision-making in ways that foster their children’s development toward rational egoism. (And the MQ serves this purpose regardless of whether the parents using it are Objectivists.)”
Shows how parenting with the Master Question is an application of certain aspects of Objectivism to the process of raising a child.
1
Add a comment...

The Objective Standard

Shared publicly  - 
 
“Give me a child for the first seven years, and he is mine for life.” —The Jesuits
“Raise a child with the Master Question, and he is his own for life.” —Sarah and Craig Biddle
4
1
Add a comment...
People
In their circles
30 people
Have them in circles
140 people
Lynn Wdowiak's profile photo
Erica Schulz's profile photo
Matt Domerofski's profile photo
Christian skeptic's profile photo
ABHILASH PATRO's profile photo
Jacob Ord's profile photo
Corey Graham's profile photo
Patrick Roos's profile photo
JohnPaul Gettelman's profile photo
Contact Information
Contact info
Phone
1-804-747-1776
Story
Tagline
A magazine for people of reason.
Introduction
Looking for an Objectivist magazine? Interested in Ayn Rand or Atlas Shrugged?

The Objective Standard is the preeminent periodical written from an Objectivist perspective (Objectivism being Ayn Rand’s philosophy of reason, egoism, and laissez-faire capitalism).

TOS is a quarterly journal based on the idea that for every human concern—from personal matters to foreign policy, from the sciences to the arts, from education to legislation—there are demonstrably objective standards by reference to which we can assess what is true or false, good or bad, right or wrong. The purpose of the journal is to analyze and evaluate ideas, trends, events, and policies accordingly.

We maintain that the standards of both knowledge and value derive from the facts of reality; that truth is discovered only by means of reason (i.e., through observation and logic); that the factual requirements of man’s life on earth determine his moral values; that the selfish pursuit of one’s own life-serving goals is virtuous; and that individual rights are moral principles defining the fundamental requirements of a civilized society.

We stand opposed to the notion that the standards of knowledge and value are not factual but subjective (feeling-based) or other-worldly (faith-based); that truth is ultimately dictated by majority opinion or a “supernatural” being’s will; that democratic consensus or “God’s word” determines what is moral; that sacrifice for “the common good” or in obedience to “God’s commands” is virtuous; and that rights are social conventions or “divine decrees.”

In stark contrast to these philosophic approaches, ours is a philosophy of reality, reason, egoism, and laissez-faire capitalism—the philosophy first presented by Ayn Rand in her masterwork, Atlas Shrugged.

(For elaboration, see “Introducing The Objective Standard” and “Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand’s Morality of Egoism.")