I'm sorry, but I'm not going to enter atheist/religious discussion in this thread (+TECHNICS ►
is not page about this), so I will ignore that part about science (here and now, at least)
About the merit of your question: you made one serious mistake: I did not say that all religious argumentation is stupid, I sad that calling it "god particle" instead of "goddamn particle" leads to stupid religious argumentation. That's quite different statement.
I'm active atheist and I have encountered many different kind of argumentation in behalf of religion - both smart and stupid, both superficial and complex (well, both about atheistic argumentation). And unfortunately, many defenders of religion often twist some facts or quotations and use it in their favor - like "scientists also believe in God, actually they are looking for "God particle", and they know something
so it has to mean something, right?". It's annoying, I have nothing personal against believers in general, but idiots can drive me crazy.