Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Stacy Cowley
I hang out in the word mines all day
I hang out in the word mines all day


Reading the unfinished "Song of Ice & Fire" (just finished Dragons) has me wondering: What are some long narrative-arc series that the author/creator does actually manage to pull together really well in the end?

X-Files (which I watched the whole way through) was a mess, Lost (which I never watched) fell apart, and books are famed for succumbing to series rot. The only long narrative series I can think of offhand that I've read/watched that comes together really brilliantly in the end is Sandman.

What else?
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
I sure hope Jack can get Twitter on track. I have so much of my career bet on it.

I'm hearing a ton of noise from the Twitter ecosphere (employees, partners, investors) about how badly-managed Twitter has been for many months. A few journalists even wrote scathing articles. Fortune wrote the one that I remember the most.

I hope they can get through this tough period of trying to get a cadence of new things shipped. Google+ is really showing how bad the product team at Twitter has been doing. Quick, name five new features you've seen on Twitter in the past year. I can't. Quick, name a meeting that Twitter's management has had with any of the users. I can't (Google is ALL OVER meeting with both big users and small here).

I hope to see an innovative Twitter again. It's important even if you like a competitive system, like Google+ or Facebook.

It's criminal how they've ignored things like lists. Google has simply outclassed Twitter on that front and it's a shame because Twitter had such a large lead and could have turned its system into something magical.

That said, the pushback I got to my post on Sunday (like from Techcrunch's +MG Siegler ) shows just how hard it is to get forward motion inside Twitter. Everyone has a different idea about what innovation at Twitter means.

I sure would not want to be Jack.

Some of the consistent stuff I've been hearing is:

1. There's very little curiosity inside the product team at Twitter. Quick, name a poweruser who works at Twitter. I can't. In fact, some of my friends have analysed the people who work at Twitter and most don't follow many people, most don't tweet very often, most don't interact with other people very often. These are attributes of people who will design new features. There is also a decided bent against heavy users, which is biasing that team toward inaction rather than anything interesting.

2. Until Jack came back engineers were being held back from shipping new features. I've heard of lots of disgruntled engineers working inside Twitter from a wide variety of people. Lately they say it's more fun to work at Twitter again (I guess it's not if you are getting fired like these four, though).

3. I've talked to a few investors in Twitter and there was consistent feedback that bad hires had been done in the move to rapidly expand. Of course, everyone has an opinion here. I bet the four folks who got fired today will have a different tune to sing.

4. Partners are complaining that Twitter doesn't know what it wants to be and doesn't have a consistent story of how it wants to proceed with partnerships. This demonstrates managerial troubles that I'm sure Jack is being forced to deal with.

The good part?

Apple just gave Twitter a major shot in the arm. Look for Jack to build off of that partnership this fall and add new features aimed at strengthening that relationship.

Also, my inbound stream has NOT slowed down since Google+ came out. So, at one level, users are just fine with Twitter staying the way it is (I think that's a mistake, just like MySpace initially looked like it had healthy usership, but then slowly lost those because the feature set just kept falling more and more behind Facebook).

Anyway, I imagine this is a tough day at Twitter and for the four who were let go.

I'm interested in seeing where Jack takes this important company in the future. I hope the product team starts shipping major new innovations that keep +Vic Gundotra from sleeping at night.

If Jack does that then we all win.

Right now, though, we're getting a small glimpse into the mess inside Twitter and it's not smelling very good.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
My very fun morning project. These look like space maps!
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Me vs My Veggie Drawer
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
I'd like to see G+ be able to collapse multiple re-shares of the same source material into one instance.
Add a comment...

Looks like I'll be going to Casablanca for visits! The sibling just got her next post-Juarez assignment.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
Used a live Google+ Hangout with +Kristie Lu Stout to explain Facebook's new video chat... too G+ doesn't embed videos, so you'll have to do the old-fashioned thing and click the link to watch.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
Okay, we've tested this scenario now:

The questions:

Say I make a 'circle X' that contains Alice, Bob, and Carol. And then I make a post that is limited to 'circle X'.

Later, I delete Bob from circle X and add Ted. (Because I'm just fickle that way.)

Can Bob still see the post I made to circle X while he was in it? or does it vanish for him?

Can Ted now see the post I made to circle X before he was a member?

The answers:

If Bob commented on the post while he was in the circle and could see it, then he will still be able to see that post and any other comments even after he's removed from the circle.

If Bob did not comment on the post, it will vanish for him after he is removed from the circle.

And Ted will able to see all posts made to the circle before he was a member.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Stacy Cowley changed her profile photo.
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded